Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Impact of fringing fields in a p-channel junctionless transistor | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Impact of fringing fields in a p-channel junctionless transistor


Abstract:

This paper investigates the effects of fringing field arising out of high-k (dielectric constant) gate insulator on the device performance of a p-channel double-gate junc...Show More

Abstract:

This paper investigates the effects of fringing field arising out of high-k (dielectric constant) gate insulator on the device performance of a p-channel double-gate junctionless transistor (p-DGJLT). The overall device performance of a p-DGJLT is degraded with such fringing field. This behavior is similar to its n-channel counterpart of similar dimension. The effects of spacers on both sides of high-k gate oxides are also studied for the device performance parameters, namely: drain current (ID), ON-state current (ION), threshold voltage (VT), subthreshold slope (SS) and drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL). SS and DIBL are improved for the device in which spacer dielectrics are included. However, VT and ION are degraded with increase in spacer dielectric constant.
Date of Conference: 03-06 December 2014
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 09 July 2015
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Bengaluru, India
Citations are not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The concept of junctionless field-effect-transistor (JLT), implemented in single-gate/double-gate/triple-gate/gate-all-around architecture has recently been reported [1]–[9]. Another JLT topology reported is vertical slit FET [10]–[11]. The major differences of JLT with conventional inversion mode (1M) metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) transistor are that in a JLT, there is no pn junction along the source-channel-drain path, the channel is homogeneous, and has uniform doping and only majority carriers carry the current unlike in an inverted channel. In principle, a JLT is an accumulation mode (AM) kind of device except that in a typical AM transistor, the regions of operation are depletion and accumulation; however in JLT it is depletion, partial depletion and accumulation, i.e., in a JLT accumulation happens at a higher threshold voltage than in an AM device. In addition to lesser SCEs and simpler process flow [3], the junctionless technology offers lesser process variability (an exception to this trend is that the threshold voltage is more sensitive to random dopant fluctuations [6] and nanowire width variation [8] than its inversion mode counterpart), surface roughness scattering [10], random telegraph-noise [4] and flicker noise [5] etc. Though bulk mobility of electron is low at higher channel doping , it increases with applied gate voltage. This is because of the screening of ionized impurities by the accumulation electrons and as a result, coulomb scattering is reduced, which increases mobility [3]. Hence, the drain current of JLT is appreciable and comparable to that in inversion mode devices though its value may not exceed the latter. JLT has lesser OFF-state current and hence it is more scalable to lower channel lengths than 1M devices are. Output current and transconductance of JLT are inferior to an 1M device, which is the major drawback of JLT.

Cites in Papers - |

Cites in Papers - Other Publishers (2)

1.
Qinghua Han, Mingshan Liu, Babak Kazemi Esfeh, Jin Hee Bae, Jean-Pierre Raskin, Qing-Tai Zhao, "Impact of gate to source/drain alignment on the static and RF performance of junctionless Si nanowire n-MOSFETs", Solid-State Electronics, vol.169, pp.107817, 2020.
2.
Jun-Yao Chen, Wei-Chih Kao, Jenn-Gwo Hwu, "Enhanced saturation current sensitivities to charge trapping and illumination in MOS tunnel diode by inserting metal in gate dielectric", Applied Physics A, vol.122, no.6, 2016.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.