Loading [a11y]/accessibility-menu.js
Recent progress of non-invasive optical modality to brain computer interface: A review study | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Recent progress of non-invasive optical modality to brain computer interface: A review study


Abstract:

Brain activity is usually measured by non-invasive modalities. Inter alia, the electroencephalogram (EEG) is used most commonly. However, EEG is very sensitive to other b...Show More

Abstract:

Brain activity is usually measured by non-invasive modalities. Inter alia, the electroencephalogram (EEG) is used most commonly. However, EEG is very sensitive to other biosignals, so other bio-signal detection modalities must be used as supplementary systems. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has good characteristics for use as such a supplementary modality, because brain activities can be measured by fNIRS through hemodynamic responses. Therefore, many scientists have adopted fNIRS for brain machine interface (BCI). Recently, fNIRS has become more compact and is robust to noise, so it could bring us to the development of an effective wearable BCI.
Date of Conference: 12-14 January 2015
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 02 April 2015
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Gangwon, Korea (South)
References is not available for this document.

I. Outline

Brain machine interfaces use brain activities as commands, for which brain activities are usually measured by electroencephalogram (EEG). However, EEG is very sensitive to the other bio-signals: heart rate, eye movement, motion, and so on. Therefore, the use of BCI employing only EEG has limitations, so other bio-signal detection modalities are usually included as supplementary modalities, including those such as electrocardiogram (ECG), electromyography (EMG), photoplethysmography (PPG), electrooculogram (EOG), and galvanic skin reflex (GSR) [1]–[4]. However, while brain activities cannot be directly measured by such modalities, they can be directly measured by the use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) through hemodynamic responses.

Select All
1.
J. G. Gil, I. S. J. Gonzalez, L. F. N. Alonso, and S. A. Garcia, "Steering a tractor by means of an EMG-based human-machine interface, " Sensors, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 7110-7126, 2011.
2.
N. Xu, X. Gao, B. Hong, X. Miao, S. Gao, and F. Yang, "BCI competition 2003-data set IIb: Enhancing P300 wave detection using ICA-based subspace projections for BCI applications, " IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1067-1072, 2004.
3.
C. Guger, A. Schlgl, C. Neuper, D. Walterspacher, T. Strein, and G. Pfurtscheller, "Rapid prototyping of an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI), " IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 49-58, 2001.
4.
Y. H. Lin, I. C. Jan, P. C. I. Ko, Y. Y. Chen, J. M. Wong, and G. J. Jan, "A wireless PDA-based physiological monitoring system for patient transport, " IEEE T. Inf. Technol. Biomed., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 439-446, 2004.
5.
S. Fazli, J. Mehnert, H. Steinbrink, G. Curio, A. Villringer, K. R. Mller, and B. Blankertz, "Enhanced performance by a hybrid NIRS-EEG brain computer interface, " Neuroimage, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 519-529, 2012.
6.
P. Pouliot, J. Tremblay, M. Robert, P. Vannasing, F. Leporec, M. Lassonde, M. Sawan, D. K. Nguyen, and F. Lesagea, "Nonlinear hemodynamic responses in human epilepsy: A multimodal analysis with fNIRS-EEG and fMRI-EEG, " J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 324-340, 2012.
7.
R. Zimmermann, L. M. Crespo, J. Edelmann, O. Lambercy, M. C. Fluet, R. Riener, M. Wolf, and R. Gassert, "Detection of motor execution using a hybrid fNIRS-biosignal BCI: A feasibility study, " J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 213-228, 2013.
8.
T. H. Falk, M. Guirgis, S. Power, and T. T. Chau, "Taking NIRS-BCIs outside the lab: Towards achieving robustness against environment Noise, " IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 136-146, 2011.
9.
G. Bauernfeind, S. C. Wriessnegger, I. Daly, and G. R. Mller-Putz, "Separating heart and brain: On the reduction of physiological noise from multichannel functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals, " J. Neural Eng., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 056010-056027, 2014.
10.
M. A. Ycel, J. Selb, D. A. Boas, S. S. Cash, and R. J. Cooper, "Reducing motion artifacts for long-term clinical NIRS monitoring using collodionfixed prism-based optical fibers, " Neuroimage, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 192-201, 2014.
11.
L. Gagnon, M. A. Ycel, D. A. Boas, and R. J. Cooper, "Further improvement in reducing superficial contamination in NIRS using double short separation measurements, " Neuroimage, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 127-135, 2014.
12.
F. B. Haeussinger, T. Dresler, S. Heinzel, M. Schecklmann, A. J. Fallgatter, and A. C. Ehlis, "Reconstructing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals impaired by extra-cranial confounds: An easy-to-use filter method, " Neuroimage, vol. 95, no. 15, pp. 69-79, 2014.
13.
N. H. Berivanloua, S. K. Setarehdana, and H. A. Noubaria, "Evoked hemodynamic response estimation using ensemble empiricalmode decomposition based adaptive algorithm applied to dual channel functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), " J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 224, no. 15, pp. 13-25, 2014.
14.
S. K. Piper, A. Krueger, S. P. Koch, J. Mehnert, C. Habermehl, J. Steinbrink, H. Obrig, and C. H. Schmitz, "A wearable multi-channel fNIRS system for brain imaging in freely moving subjects, " Neuroimage, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 64-71, 2014.
15.
D. T. Delpy, M. Cope, P. V. Zee, S. Arridge, S. Wrayt, and J. Wyatt, "Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement, " Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1433-1442, 1988.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.