Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Learning to Rank Improves IR in SE | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Learning to Rank Improves IR in SE


Abstract:

Learning to Rank (LtR) encompasses a class of machine learning techniques developed to automatically learn how to better rank the documents returned for an information re...Show More

Abstract:

Learning to Rank (LtR) encompasses a class of machine learning techniques developed to automatically learn how to better rank the documents returned for an information retrieval (IR) search. Such techniques offer great promise to software engineers because they better adapt to the wider range of differences in the documents and queries seen in software corpora. To encourage the greater use of LtR in software maintenance and evolution research, this paper explores the value that LtR brings to two common maintenance problems: feature location and traceability. When compared to the worst, median, and best models identified from among hundreds of alternative models for performing feature location, LtR ubiquitously provides a statistically significant improvement in MAP, MRR, and MnDCG scores. Looking forward a further motivation for the use of LtR is its ability to enable the development of software specific retrieval models.
Date of Conference: 29 September 2014 - 03 October 2014
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 06 December 2014
Electronic ISBN:978-1-4799-6146-7
Print ISSN: 1063-6773
Conference Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
No metrics found for this document.

I. Introduction

Haiduc et al. [11] noted in their recent ICSE paper that there are more than twenty distinct software engineering (SE) tasks addressed using information retrieval (IR) techniques. Dang and Croft observe that traditional and more modern IR techniques are all based on a surprisingly small number of features such as term frequency, inverse document frequency, and document length [5]. Unfortunately, incorporating new features (such as page rank or proximity information) is often difficult, especially when it requires a change to the underlying model [5].

Usage
Select a Year
2025

View as

Total usage sinceDec 2014:198
01234JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec300000000000
Year Total:3
Data is updated monthly. Usage includes PDF downloads and HTML views.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.