Energy consumption of IR-UWB based WSN in a start topology | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Energy consumption of IR-UWB based WSN in a start topology


Abstract:

Energy consumption was and is an interesting issue that is stills a factor in the development of Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) especially in the physical and MAC layers; ...Show More

Abstract:

Energy consumption was and is an interesting issue that is stills a factor in the development of Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) especially in the physical and MAC layers; it is the primary metric to design a sensor node in wireless sensor network. The introduction of the Impulse Radio Ultra Wide Band (IR-UWB) Technology in the field of WSN was promising for researchers especially for its low power consumption feature, to exploit this feature we used a novel low power consumption MAC protocol in the MAC layer designed for wireless sensor networks using IR-UWB transceivers called SWIMAC. In this paper we will formulate and simulate the energy consumption for the sink and the sensor nodes in the case of start topology, the results obtained will be compared to the case of a grid topology. We used MiXiM platform under OMNET++ simulator to analyze and compare the energy consumption in the both topologies.
Date of Conference: 14-16 April 2014
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 29 September 2014
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Marrakech, Morocco
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is one of the most interesting networking technologies since its ability to use no infrastructure communications, it have been used for many applications, including military sensing, data broadcasting [1], environmental monitoring [2], Intelligent Vehicular Systems [3], multimedia [4], patient monitoring [5], agriculture [6], industrial automation [7] and audio [8] etc. This kind of networks has not yet achieved widespread deployments, though it has been proven able to meet the requirements of many classes of applications. Wireless sensor nodes have some limitations as lower computing capabilities, smaller memory devices, small bandwidth and very lower battery autonomy; these constraints represent the main challenges in the development or deployment of any solution using WSNs. Energy consumption is a very important design consideration in WSNs, New wireless technologies emerge in the recent few years, providing large opportunities in terms of low power consumption, high and low rate and are promising for environment monitoring applications. IR-UWB technology is one of these new technologies and is considered as a next generation of the IEEE802.15.4 standard; it is a promising solution for WSN due to its various advantages such as its robustness to severe multipath fading even in indoor environments, its potential to provide accurate localization, its low cost and complexity, and low energy consumption [9]. The development and deployment of WSN s have taken traditional network topologies in new directions. Different Wireless sensor network topologies existed. In this paper we focus on the start and grid topologies.

Select All
1.
T.-W. Sung, T.-T. Wu, C.-S. Yang and Y.-M. Huang, "Reliable Data Broadcast For Zigbee Wireless Sensor Networks", International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 504-520, 2010.
2.
W. Suk Jang and M. William Healyn, "Assessment of Performance Metrics for Use of WSNs in Buildings", International Symposium on Automation And Robotic in Construction, pp. 570-575, 2009.
3.
M. Mohamed Nabeel, M. FakhrEl-Dein and S. El-Kader, "Intelligent Vehicle Recognition based on Wireless Sensor Network", International Journal of Computer Science Issues, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 164-174, 2013.
4.
C. Suh, Z. Hameed Mir and Y.-B. Ko, "Design and implementation of enhanced IEEE802.15.4 for supporting multimedia service in Wireless Sensor Networks", The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 2568-2581, 2008.
5.
N. Golmie, D. Cypher and O. Rebala, "Performance analysis of low rate wireless technologies for medical applications", Journal of Computer Communications, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1266-1275, 2005.
6.
H. Zhoul, X. Chen, X. Liu and J. Yang, "Applications of Zigbee Wireless Technology Tomeasurement System in Grain Storage", Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture, vol. 3, pp. 2021-2029, 2009.
7.
A. Willig, "Recent and emerging topics in wireless industrial communication", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 102-124, 2008.
8.
M. Meli, M. Sommerhalder and M. Gysel, "Using IEEE802.15.4 / ZigBee in audio applications", Embedded World Nuremberg, February 2006.
9.
A. Lecointre, A. Berthe, D. Dragomirescu and R. Plana, "Performance Evaluation of Impluse Radio Ultra Wide Band Wireless Sensor Networks", 28th IEEE conference on Military communications, pp. 1191-1197, 2009.
10.
P. Baronti, P. Pillai, C.V.W. Chook, S. Chessa, A. Gotta and Y.F. Hu, "Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey on the state of the art and the 802.15.4 and ZigBee standards", Journal of Computer communications, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1655-1695, 2007.
11.
J.-S. Lee, Y.-W. Su and C.-C. Shen, "A Comparative Study of Wireless Protocols: Bluetooth UWB ZigBee and Wi-Fi", the 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 46-51, 2007.
12.
Z. Rezaei and S. Mobininejad, "Energy Saving in Wireless Sensor Networks", International Journal of Computer Science Engineering Survey, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23-37, 2012.
13.
M. Abou El-Nasr and H. Shaban, "BER Performance and Data Throughput of Sinusoidal Template based Impulse-Radio Ultra Wideband Receivers for Wireless Body Area Networks", American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 487-496, 2013.
14.
J. Rousselot, A. El- Hoiydi and J. - D. Decotignie, "Performance evaluation of the IEEE 802. 15.4A UWB physical layer for Body Area Networks", 12th IEEE International Symposium on Computers and Communications, pp. 969-974, 2007.
15.
E. Irwan, Shah Saadon, J. Abdullah and N. Ismail, "Evaluating The IEEE 802.15.4a UWB Physical Layer for WSN Applications", IEEE Symposium on Wireless Technology and Applications, pp. 22-25, 2013.
16.
A. Darif, R. Saadane and D. Aboutajdine, "Synchronized WideMac (SWIMAC): A New Efficient MAC Protocol for IR-UWB Based WSN", European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 52-72, 2013.
17.
A. Kopke, M. Swigulski, K. Wessel, D. Willkomm, P. T. Klein Haneveld, T. E. V. Parker, et al., "Simulating Wireless and Mobile Networks in OMNeT++ the MiXiM Vision", 1st international conference on Simulation tools and techniques for communications networks and systems workshops, pp. 1-8, 2008.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.