Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Modeling & control of a meat-cutting robotic cell | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Modeling & control of a meat-cutting robotic cell


Abstract:

In this paper, the modeling, simulation and control of a robotic meat cutting cell is described. A dual-arm system is used in the separation task, one arm cuts the meat a...Show More

Abstract:

In this paper, the modeling, simulation and control of a robotic meat cutting cell is described. A dual-arm system is used in the separation task, one arm cuts the meat along a deformable guide line while the second arm graps and pulls the meat to further increase the opening of the valley. The steps taken to model the cell in order to ensure a realistic interaction between the robots and the flexible object are outlined. A control scheme, using an external vision and force sensors, is proposed that copes with on-line object deformation. The proposed control scheme is validated using the simulator environment.
Date of Conference: 25-29 November 2013
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 13 March 2014
Electronic ISBN:978-1-4799-2722-7
Conference Location: Montevideo, Uruguay
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The meat processing industry is the largest sector of the food industry in France accounting for over 25 % of the total employees and including over 2,000 companies [1]. However the industry is facing a shortage of skilled labor due to the both hazardous and strenuous working conditions. The ARMS

www.arms.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr

project, A multi arms Robotic system for Muscle Separation, aims to contribute to the separation of beef rounds (hindquarters) by an autonomous robotic cell. A muti-arm system is proposed in order to deal with key challenges such as the variability of the target object and its deformable nature.

Select All
1.
Institut national de la statistique et des etudes economiques (INSEE), "Industrie agroalimentaire," http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document. asp?ref id=T10F181, 2009, accessed: 2013-04-22.
2.
G. Purnell, "Robotic equipment in the meat industry," Meat science, vol. 49, pp. S297-S307, 1998.
3.
J. Billingsley, A. Visala, and M. Dunn, "Robotics in agriculture and forestry," in Springer handbook of robotics, B. Siciliano and O. Khatib, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2008, pp. 1065-1077.
4.
L. Hinrichsen, "Manufacturing technology in the danish pig slaughter industry," Meat science, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 271-275, 2010.
5.
G. Guire, L. Sabourin, G. Gogu, and E. Lemoine, "Robotic cell with redundant architecture and force control: application to cutting and boning," in 2010 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region (RAAD). IEEE, 2010, pp. 99-104.
6.
S. Misra, K. Ramesh, and A. Okamura, "Modeling of tool-tissue interactions for computer-based surgical simulation: a literature review," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1-41, 2008.
7.
U. Kuhnapfel, H. Cakmak, and H. Maaß, "Endoscopic surgery training using virtual reality and deformable tissue simulation," Computers , vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 671-682, 2000.
8.
S. Frisken-Gibson, "Using linked volumes to model object collisions, deformation, cutting, carving, and joining," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 333-348, 1999.
9.
M. Mahvash and V. Hayward, "Haptic rendering of cutting: A fracture mechanics approach," Haptics-e, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1-12, 2001.
10.
U. Meier, O. Lopez, C. Monserrat, M. Juan, and M. Alcaniz, "Realtime deformable models for surgery simulation: a survey," Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 183-197, 2005.
11.
B. Balaguer and S. Carpin, "Combining imitation and reinforcement learning to fold deformable planar objects," in Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 2011, pp. 1405-1412.
12.
H. Delingette, S. Cotin, and N. Ayache, "A hybrid elastic model allowing real-time cutting, deformations and force-feedback for surgery training and simulation," in Computer Animation, 1999. Proceedings, 1999, pp. 70-81.
13.
L. Vigneron, J. Verly, and S. Warfield, "On extended finite element method (xfem) for modelling of organ deformations associated with surgical cuts," Medical Simulation, pp. 134-143, 2004.
14.
B. Espiau, F. Chaumette, and P. Rives, "A new approach to visual servoing in robotics," Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 313-326, jun 1992.
15.
F. Chaumette, "Visual servo control. I. Basic approaches," Robotics Automation, no. December, pp. 82-90, 2006.
16.
N. Andreff, T. Dallej, P. Martinet et al., "Image-based visual servoing of gough-stewart parallel manipulators using legs observation," in 8th International IFAC Symposium on Robot Control (SYROCO 2006), 2006.
17.
K. Hosoda, K. Igarashi, and M. Asada, "Adaptive hybrid control for visual and force servoing in an unknown environment," Robotics Magazine, IEEE, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 39-43, 1998.
18.
V. Lippiello, B. Siciliano, and L. Villani, "Robot interaction control using force and vision," in Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 2006, pp. 1470-1475.
19.
Y. Mezouar, M. Prats, and P. Martinet, "External hybrid vision/force control," in Intl. Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR07), 2007.
20.
W. Khalil and J. Kleinfinger, "A new geometric notation for open and closed-loop robots," in Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3. IEEE, 1986, pp. 1174-1179.
21.
O. Khatib, "A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation," IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 43-53, 1987.
22.
N. Hogan, "Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part illapplications," Journal of dynamic systems, measurement, and control, vol. 107, no. 2, p. 17, 1985.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.