I. Introduction
Many biometric traits, such as face, fingerprint, DNA, and palmprint, have been widely used in legal cases for criminal and victim identification. They are not applicable to evidence images with only non-facial skin. These legal cases include but not limited to child pornography, violent protests, and terrorist attacks, where criminals always hide their faces. For example, the convenience of the Internet has promoted a mass increase in child pornography. The U.S. Department of Justice reported that there were more than 20 million IP addresses nationwide offering child pornographies and the demand for child pornographies was responsible for the increase in child sex abuse cases [1]. It is believed that most of these illegal images are likely taken with consumer cameras and compressed with the JPEG method, which is widely installed in them. Though tattoos and skin marks have been considered, they have some weaknesses. Tattoos are neither universal nor unique and distinctive skin mark patterns are not always available. Blood vessels under human skin form large and robust patterns providing rich information for personal identification. They are generally regarded unique and stable over time, except for the cases of injury, disease (e.g. varicose veins and spider veins), and surgery. Thus, using blood vessel patterns for criminal and victim identification is desirable. Based on the principles of optics and skin biophysics, Tang and Zhang et al. [2], [3] proposed methods to uncover blood vessel patterns hidden in color skin images for criminal and victim identification. These methods were evaluated on uncompressed images and the experimental results were encouraging. With these methods, blood vessel patterns can be extracted from color skin images for personal identification. However, the quality of blood vessel patterns generated by them highly depends on the quality of input images. The JPEG method can severely degrade image quality and make uncovering blood vessel patterns difficult. Figs. 1(b) and (d) show two blood vessel patterns, one from the uncompressed image given in Fig. 1(a) and the other from its compressed version with a quality factor of 50 given in Fig. 1(c). Fig. 1 indicates that the resultant blood vessel patterns from [3] can be highly influenced by the JPEG method. Uncompressed image, JPEG compressed image and the corresponding resultant blood vessel patterns from [3]. (a) is an uncompressed image and (b) is the blood vessel patterns from (a), (c) is the JPEG compressed version of (a), and (d) is the blood vessel patterns from (c).