Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
State estimation with missing measurements using IMM | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

State estimation with missing measurements using IMM


Abstract:

The missing of the measurements will deteriorate the estimation or even make the estimators divergent. We first analyze the performance of the existed estimation approach...Show More

Abstract:

The missing of the measurements will deteriorate the estimation or even make the estimators divergent. We first analyze the performance of the existed estimation approaches in nonlinear systems with missing measurements. According to the effectiveness of the multiple model estimation over single model estimation, we propose to give the estimates of the states using the interacting multiple model estimation (IMM). The IMM contains two model sets. One of them corresponds to the systems modes and the other corresponds to the occurrence of the missing of the measurements. The simulation results show the proposed approach is more stable and accurate than the existed estimation approaches.
Date of Conference: 25-27 May 2013
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 18 July 2013
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Guiyang, China
References is not available for this document.

1 INTRODUCTION

The problem of state estimation is important in various applications ranging from target tracking and detection. Many useful estimation approaches have been proposed when there is no information loss in measurements. Multiple-model (MM) estimation approaches turned up to solve the problems which exist in single-model estimation and have been applied in many domains in practice. The main application involves air traffic control, ballistic missile defense and maneuvering target tracking [1] [2]. In MM algorithms, a set of models are set up to approximate the system modes. Interacting Multiple Model Algorithm (IMM) has been demonstrated to be the most cost-effective algorithm among all the MM estimation approaches.

Select All
1.
C.-E. Seah, and F. Gustafsson, State estimation for stochastic linear hybrid systems: an IMM algorithm approach, IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 45, No. 1, 376-392, 2009.
2.
J. Lan, X. Rong Li, C. Mu. Best-model augmentation for variable-structure multiple-model estimation. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic System, vol. 47, No. 3, 2008-2025, 2011.
3.
N. E. Nahi. Optimal recursive estimation with uncertain observation. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, vol. 15, No. 4, 457-462, 1969.
4.
Y. Mo, B. Sinopoli, Kalman filtering with intermittent observations: tail distribution and critical value. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 57, No. 3, 677-689, 2012.
5.
S. Kar, B. Sinopoli, J. M. F. Moura, Kalman filtering with intermittent observations: weak convergence to a stationary distribution. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 57, No. 2, 405-420, 2012.
6.
H. Zhang, X. Song, L. Shi, Convergence and mean square stability of suboptimal estimator for systems with measurement packet dropping, vol. 57, No. 5, 1248-1253, 2012.
7.
K. Naeem, F. Sajjad, D. W. Gu, Improvement on state estimation for discrete-time LTI systems with measurement loss, Measurement, vol. 43, No. 10, 1609-1622, 2010.
8.
N. Khan, D. W. Gu, State estimation in the case of loss of observations. In ICCAS-SICE, 1840-1845, 2009.
9.
Y. Boers, H. Driessen, Results on the modified Riccati equation: target tracking applications. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic System, Vol. 42, No. 1, 379-384, 2006.
10.
A. Hermoso-Carazo, J. LinaresS-Perez, Nonlinear estimation applying an unscented transformation in systems with correlated uncertain observations, Applied Mathmatics and Computation, vol. 217, No. 20, 7998-8009, 2011.
11.
A. Hermoso-Carazo, J. LinaresS-Perez. Different approaches for state filtering in nonlinear systems with uncertain observations. Applied Mathmatics and Computation, Vol. 187, No. 2, 708-724, 2007
12.
S. Kluge, Stochastic stability of the extended Kalman filter with intermittent observations, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol. 55, No. 2, 514-518, 2010.
13.
L. Li, Y. Q. Xia, Stochastic stability of the unscented Kalman filter with intermittent observations. Automatica, Vol. 48, No. 5, 978-981, 2012.
14.
Y. Sawaragi, T. Katayama, S. Fujishige, Sequential State Estimation with Interrupted Observation. Information and Control, Vol. 21, No. 1, 156-71, 1972.
15.
X. R. Li, and V. P. Jilkov, J. F. Ru, Mutiple-model estimation with variable structure-part VI: expected-mode augmentation, IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 41, No. 3, 853-867, 2005.
16.
A. Farina, B. Ristic, D. Benvenuti, Tracking a ballistic target: comparison of several nonlinear filters. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 38, No. 3, 854-867, 2002.
17.
K. Xiong, H. Y. Zhang, C. W. Chan, Performance evaluation of UKF-based nonlinear filtering, Automatica, Vol. 42, No. 2, 261-270, 2006.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.