Abstract:
Analysis of convergence of the algebraic reconstruction technique (ART) shows it to be predisposed to converge to a solution faster than simultaneous methods, such as tho...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
Analysis of convergence of the algebraic reconstruction technique (ART) shows it to be predisposed to converge to a solution faster than simultaneous methods, such as those of the Cimmino-Landweber (1992) type, the expectation maximization maximum likelihood method for the Poisson model (EMML), and the simultaneous multiplicative ART (SMART), which use all the data at each step. Although the choice of ordering of the data and of relaxation parameters are important, as Herman and Meyer (1993) have shown, they are not the full story. The analogous multiplicative ART (MART), which applies only to systems y=Px in which y>0, P/spl ges/0 and a nonnegative solution is sought, is also sequential (or "row-action"), rather than simultaneous, but does not generally exhibit the same accelerated convergence relative to its simultaneous version, SMART. By dividing each equation by the maximum of the corresponding row of P, we find that this rescaled MART (RMART) does converge faster, when solutions exist, significantly so in cases in which the row maxima are substantially less than one. Such cases arise frequently in tomography and when the columns of P have been normalized to have sum one. Between simultaneous methods, which use all the data at each step, and sequential (or row-action) methods, which use only a single data value at each step, there are the block-iterative (or ordered subset) methods, in which a single block or subset of the data is processed at each step. The ordered subset EM (OSEM) of Hudson et al. (see IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol.13, p.601-9, 1994) is significantly faster than the EMML, but often fails to converge. The "rescaled block-iterative" EMML (RBI-EMML) is an accelerated block-iterative version of EMML that converges, in the consistent case, to a solution, for any choice of subsets; it reduces to OSEM when the restrictive "subset balanced" condition holds. Rescaled block-iterative versions of SMART and MART also exhibit accelerated convergence.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing ( Volume: 7, Issue: 1, January 1998)
DOI: 10.1109/83.650854
References is not available for this document.
Select All
1.
G. Herman and L. Meyer, "Algebraic reconstruction techniques can be made computationally efficient", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 12, pp. 600-609, Sept. 1993.
2.
L. Shepp and Y. Vardi, "Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. MI-1, pp. 113-122, Oct. 1982.
3.
K. Lange and R. Carson, "EM reconstruction for emission and transmission tomography", J. Comput. Assist. Tomog., vol. 8, pp. 306-312, 1984.
4.
Y. Vardi, L. Shepp and L. Kaufman, "A statistical model for positron emission tomography", J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., vol. 80, pp. 8-37, 1985.
5.
K. Lange, M. Bahn and R. Little, "A theoretical study of some maximum likelihood algorithms for emission and transmission tomography", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. MI-6, pp. 106-114, June 1987.
6.
H. Guan and R. Gordon, "A projection access order for speedy convergence of ART (algebraic reconstruction technique): A multilevel scheme for computed tomography", Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 39, pp. 2005-2022, 1994.
7.
A. Iusem and A. DePierro, "Convergence results for an accelerated nonlinear Cimmino algorithm", Numer. Math., vol. 49, pp. 367-378, 1986.
8.
R. Ansorge, "Connections between the Cimmino method and the Kaczmarz method for the solution of singular and regular systems of equations", Computing, vol. 33, pp. 367-375, 1986.
9.
M. Trumer, "SMART—An algorithm for reconstructing pictures from projections", J. Appl. Math. Phys., vol. 34, pp. 746-753, Sept. 1983.
10.
A. Anderson and A. Kak, "Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): A new implementation of the ART algorithm", Ultrason. Imag., vol. 6, pp. 81-94, Jan. 1984.
11.
P. Gilbert, "Iterative methods for three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections", J. Theoret. Biol., vol. 36, pp. 105-117, 1972.
12.
C. Byrne, "Iterative image reconstruction algorithms based on cross entropy minimization", IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 96-103, Jan. 1993.
13.
C. Byrne, "Erratum and addendum to Iterative image reconstruction algorithms based on cross-entropy minimization", IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 225-226, 1995.
14.
C. Byrne, "Iterative reconstruction algorithms based on cross-entropy minimization" in Image Models (And Their Speech Model Cousins), New York:Springer-Verlag, vol. 80, 1996.
15.
Y. Censor, "Row-action methods for huge and sparse systems and their applications", SIAM Rev., vol. 23, pp. 444-4-66, Oct. 1981.
16.
R. Gordon, R. Bender and G. Herman, "Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography", J. Theoret. Biol., vol. 29, pp. 471-481, 1970.
17.
L. Bregman, "The relaxation method of finding the common point of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming", USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys., vol. 7, pp. 200-217, 1967.
18.
Y. Censor and A. Lent, "An iterative row-action method for interval convex programming", J. Opt. Theory Appl., vol. 34, pp. 321-353, 1981.
19.
A. R. DePierro and A. N. Iusem, "A relaxed version of Bregmans method for convex programming", J. Optimiz. Theory Appl., vol. 51, pp. 421-440, 1986.
20.
Y. Censor and J. Segman, "On block-iterative entropy maximization", J. Inform. Optimiz. Sci., vol. 8, pp. 275-291, 1987.
21.
C. Byrne, "Block-iterative methods for image reconstruction from projections", IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 5, pp. 792-794, 1996.
22.
P. Eggermont, G. Herman and A. Lent, "Iterative algorithms for large partitioned linear systems with applications to image reconstruction", Lin. Alg. Appl., vol. 40, pp. 37-67, 1981.
23.
T. Elfving, "Block-iterative methods for consistent and inconsistent linear equations", Numer. Math., vol. 35, pp. 1-12, 1980.
24.
H. Hudson and R. Larkin, "Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 13, pp. 601-609, Dec. 1994.
25.
C. Byrne, "Convergent block-iterative algorithms for image reconstruction from inconsistent data", IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 6, pp. 1296-1304, Sept. 1997.
26.
D. Lalush, S. Karimi and B. Tsui, "Convergence and resolution recovery of block-iterative EM algorithms modeling 3D detector response in S PECT", Conf. Rec. IEEE Medical Imaging Conf., pp. 1618-1622, 1996-Nov.
27.
W. Xia, S. Glick, T.-S. Pan, E. Soares and D.-S. Luo, "Region of interest evaluation of SPECT image reconstruction methods using a realistic brain phantom", Conf. Rec. IEEE Medical Imaging Conf, pp. 1547-1548, 1996-Nov.
28.
C. Byrne, E. Soares, T.-S. Pan, S. Glick and M. King, "Accelerating the EM algorithm using rescaled block-iterative methods", Conf. Rec. IEEE Medical Imaging Conf, pp. 1752-1756, 1996-Nov.
29.
S. Kaczmarz, "Angenaeherte Aufloessung von Systemen linearen Gleichungen", Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Lett., vol. A35, pp. 355-357, 1937.
30.
G. Cimmino, "Calcolo approssimato per le soluzioni dei sistemi di equazioni lineari" in Ricerca Sci., Roma, vol. 2, pp. 326-333, 1938.