Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Error-Free Matthiessen's Rule in the MOSFET Universal Mobility Region | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Error-Free Matthiessen's Rule in the MOSFET Universal Mobility Region


Abstract:

Through the experimentally validated inversion-layer mobility simulation, we devise an error-free version of Matthiessen's rule for a single-gate n-channel bulk MOSFET in...Show More

Abstract:

Through the experimentally validated inversion-layer mobility simulation, we devise an error-free version of Matthiessen's rule for a single-gate n-channel bulk MOSFET in the universal mobility region. The core of the new rule lies in a semi-empirical model, which explicitly expresses the errors due to the conventional use of Matthiessen's rule as a function of both the lowest subband population and the relative strength of individual mobility components. The model holds under practical conditions (with temperatures up to 400 K) and in a broad range of substrate doping concentrations (1014 to 1018 cm-3). To make the error-free proposal more general, we elaborate on several issues, including strain, impurity Coulomb scattering, and remote scattering. The thin-film case can be treated accordingly.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices ( Volume: 60, Issue: 2, February 2013)
Page(s): 753 - 758
Date of Publication: 01 January 2013

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

To probe individual scattering mechanisms in the inversion layers of MOSFETs, Matthiessen's rule may be favored because of its additive property of reciprocal mobility components. As pointed out earlier by Stern [1], however, there will be errors of more than 15% due to the use of Matthiessen's rule for temperatures over 40 K. Since then, there have been four fundamentally different methods published in the literature concerning the validity and applicability of Matthiessen's rule [2]–[7]. First, Matthiessen's rule must be carried out under extreme or impractical conditions such as very low temperatures (near absolute zero) [2]. Second, sophisticated numerical simulations on individual mobility components were instead used, with no need to account for Matthiessen's rule [3]. Third, for the engineering purpose, the errors caused by Matthiessen's rule were overlooked while assessing mobility components individually [4], [5]. Fourth, mobility simulations were performed to deliver the errors of the mobility components extracted using the rule, with [6] and without [3], [7] the inclusion of ionized impurity Coulomb scattering.

Select All
1.
F. Stern, "Calculated temperature dependence of mobility in silicon inversion layers", Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 1469-1472, Jun. 1980.
2.
J. Li and T. P. Ma, "Scattering of silicon inversion layer electrons by metal/oxide interface roughness", J. Appl. Phys., vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 4212-4215, Nov. 1987.
3.
M. V. Fischetti, F. Gmiz and W. Hnsch, "On the enhanced electron mobility in strained-silicon inversion layers", J. Appl. Phys., vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 7320-7324, Dec. 2002.
4.
S. Takagi, A. Toriumi, M. Iwase and H. Tango, "On the universality of inversion layer mobility in Si MOSFETs: Part I—Effects of substrate impurity concentration", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2357-2362, Dec. 1994.
5.
J. R. Hauser, "Extraction of experimental mobility data for MOS devices", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1981-1988, Nov. 1996.
6.
D. Esseni and F. Driussi, "A quantitative error analysis of the mobility extraction according to the Matthiessen rule in advanced MOS transistors", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 2415-2422, Aug. 2011.
7.
M. J. Chen, S. C. Chang, S. J. Kuang, C. C. Lee, W. H. Lee, K. H. Cheng, et al., "Temperature-dependent remote-Coulomb-limited electron mobility in \$hbox{n}^{+}\$-polysilicon ultrathin gate oxide nMOSFETs", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1038-1044, Apr. 2011.
8.
M. J. Chen, C. C. Lee and K. H. Cheng, "Hole effective masses as a booster of self-consistent six-band k \$cdot\$ p simulation in inversion layers of pMOSFETs", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 931-937, Apr. 2011.
9.
M. J. Chen, L. M. Chang, S. J. Kuang, C. W. Lee, S. H. Hsieh, C. A. Wang, et al., "Temperature-oriented mobility measurement and simulation to assess surface roughness in ultrathin-gate-oxide (\$sim\$1 nm) nMOSFETs and its TEM evidence", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 949-955, Apr. 2012.
10.
M. J. Chen and W. H. Lee, "Evidence for the fourfold-valley confinement electron piezo-effective-mass coefficient in inversion layers of \$langle hbox{110}rangle\$ uniaxial-tensile-strained (001) nMOSFETs", IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 755-757, Jun. 2012.
11.
F. Stern, "Self-consistent results for n-type Si inversion layers", Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 4891-4899, Jun. 1972.
12.
D. K. Ferry and S. M. Goodnick, Transport in Nanostructures, U.K., Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999.
13.
D. Esseni, P. Palestri and L. Selmi, Nanoscale MOS Transistors: Semi-Classical Transport and Applications, U.K., Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011.
14.
S. Takagi, J. L. Hoyt, J. J. Welser and J. F. Gibbons, "Comparative study of phonon-limited mobility of two-dimensional electrons in strained and unstrained Si metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistors", J. Appl. Phys., vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 1567-1577, Aug. 1996.
15.
Yamakawa, H. Ueno, K. Taniguchi, C. Hamaguchi, K. Miyatsuji, K. Masaki, et al., "Study of interface roughness dependence of electron mobility in Si inversion layers using the Monte Carlo method", J. Appl. Phys., vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 911-916, Jan. 1996.
16.
M. Lundstrom, Fundamentals of Carrier Transport, U.K., Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009.
17.
K. Hirakawa and H. Sakaki, "Mobility of the two-dimensional electron gas at selectively doped n -type \$hbox{Al}_{x}hbox{Ga}_{1 - x}hbox{As/GaAs}\$ heterojunctions with controlled electron concentrations", Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 8291-8303, Jun. 1986.
18.
M. V. Fischetti, T. P. O'Regan, S. Narayanan, C. Sachs, S. Jin, J. Kim, et al., "Theoretical study of some physical aspects of electronic transport in nMOSFETs at the 10-nm gate-length", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 2116-2136, Sep. 2007.
19.
F. Gmiz, J. A. Lpez-Villanueva, J. B. Roldn, J. E. Carceller and P. Cartujo, "Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport properties in extremely thin SOI MOSFETs", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1122-1126, May 1998.
20.
D. Esseni, A. Abramo, L. Selmi and E. Sangiorgi, "Physically based modeling of low field electron mobility in ultrathin single- and double-gate SOI n-MOSFETs", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2445-2455, Dec. 2003.
21.
D. Esseni, "On the modeling of surface roughness limited mobility in SOI MOSFETs and its correlation to the transistor effective field", IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 394-401, Mar. 2004.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.