Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
System of systems thinking in product development: A system dynamic approach | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

System of systems thinking in product development: A system dynamic approach


Abstract:

Companies ceaselessly strive to have a systemic approach to survive. One of those approaches is system of system engineering (SoSE) that enables the decision-makers to un...Show More

Abstract:

Companies ceaselessly strive to have a systemic approach to survive. One of those approaches is system of system engineering (SoSE) that enables the decision-makers to understand the interaction of different systems in terms of costs, lead time, and quality. This paper considers product development (PD) in light of SoSE. Different PD stages treated as a system and analyzed to see the effects of concurrent engineering on total cost and lead time. We also analyze the marketing strategy with its components to have sound decision based on SoSE. We use a system dynamics approach and the study found that, the more cost allocated in early stage, the more reduced the total cost (by half) and the lead time reduced by a quarter. From marketing system analysis with interdependent variables, firms can control to a certain level. Some variables could be unpredictable and difficult to control as the system grows more complex.
Date of Conference: 16-19 July 2012
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 24 January 2013
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Genova, Italy
References is not available for this document.

1 Introduction

Companies want to sell their products as fast as possible to have a bigger market share. But, time-to-market is not an easy task with several complicated systems, processes and activities especially in high technology industries that require a huge amount of investment (for example power plant and aerospace industries). Decisions that are made at early design stage during product development have some quantifiable impacts of direct and indirect product development related activities and costs. This is also extended to the project time and cost overrun problem that mainly due to design changes (S. Chritamara et. al, 2002)

Select All
1.
B. Prasad Analysis of pricing strategies for new product introduction, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.132-141, 1997.
2.
B. Wilkinson and M. Allen. Parallel Programming: Techniques and Applications Using Networked Workstations and Parallel Computers, Prentice Hall, USA, 1999
3.
David. M. Anderson, how to design for low cost, design in high quality, design for lean manufacture, and design quickly for fast production, Design for Manufacturability & Concurrent Engineering, CIM Press, Cambria, California, 2008.
4.
Department of defense (DoD), Guide for Integrating Systems Engineering into DoD Acquisition Contracts http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/docs/Integrating-SE- Acquisition-Contracts-guide-121106.pdf. Version 1. 2006 accessed on 31.06.2012.
5.
Department of defense (DoD), Guide for Integrating Systems Engineering into DoD Acquisition Contracts http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/docs/SE-Guide-for-SoS. pdf version 1. 2008 accessed on 31.06.2012.
6.
International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), Systems Engineering Handbook http://g2sebok.incose.org/documents/assets/MSS//Final/ sh%20hdbk%202.2.pdf.2000. Accessed on 01.06.2012
7.
J. O. Clark, "System of Systems Engineering and Family of Systems Engineering from a Standards, V-Model, and Dual-V Model Perspective," Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon 2009), Mar., pp.381-387. 2009
8.
J.A. Lane, and R. Valerdi, "Accelerating system of systems engineering understanding and optimization through lean enterprise principles," Systems Conference, 2010 4th Annual IEEE San Diego, CA, 5-8 April 2010, pp.196-201.
9.
LG. Marujo, (2009). Rework Impacts Evaluation through System Dynamics Approach in overlapped Product Development Schedule. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, Volume 4, Issue 2
10.
M.G., Martin, M.R., Weeks, and K.J.,Davis, "Delivering Successful Service and Outsourcing Projects Using Concurrent Engineering Methodologies", Proceedings of the 29th Annual Project Management Institute, Seminars & Symposium Long Beach, California, USA: Papers Presented October 9 to 15. 1998
11.
M.W. Maier. Architecting principles for systems of-systems', Systems Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.267-284. 1999
12.
Port, Otis, Zachary Schiller, and Resa King. A Smarter Way to Manufacture: How 'concurrent engineering' can reinvigorate American industry, Business Week, April 30, 1990, pp. 110-117. 1990
13.
S. Chritamara, S.O. Ogunlana, N.L. Bach. System dynamics modeling of design and build construction projects. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol. 2 Iss: 4, pp.269-295. 2002
14.
Siemens PLM Software. Enabling innovation through integrated systems engineering, Create, capture and deliver a systems perspective through integrated lifecycle processes and cross-discipline synchronization. A White paper.http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/de-ch/Images/9009-tcm782-4883.pdf, 2011 Accessed on 02.06.2012
15.
Sterman, J.D., 2000. Business Dynamics: systems thinking and modelling for a complex world, New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
16.
Sterman, J.D., 2002. All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review, Vol. 18 No.4, pp. 501-531. (Pubitemid 36186312)

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.