Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm Based on Reinforcement Learning to Optimization of Broad-Band Reflector Antennas Satellite | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm Based on Reinforcement Learning to Optimization of Broad-Band Reflector Antennas Satellite


Abstract:

This paper aims to provide an improved NSGA-II (Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-version II) which incorporates a parameter-free self-tuning approach by reinforcem...Show More

Abstract:

This paper aims to provide an improved NSGA-II (Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-version II) which incorporates a parameter-free self-tuning approach by reinforcement learning technique, called Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm Based on Reinforcement Learning (NSGA-RL). The proposed method is particularly compared with the classical NSGA-II when applied to a satellite coverage problem. Furthermore, not only the optimization results are compared with results obtained by other multiobjective optimization methods, but also guarantee the advantage of no time-spending and complex parameter tuning.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics ( Volume: 48, Issue: 2, February 2012)
Page(s): 767 - 770
Date of Publication: 23 January 2012

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

A. Introduction

The study of satellite broad-cast communication had been done in several works [1], [3], [4]. Basically, the main objective of this class of problem is to reach a maximum gain and illumination uniformity inside a prescribed region [1], [4].

Select All
1.
A. C. Lisboa, D. A. G. Vieira, J. A. Vasconcelos, R. R. Saldanha and R. H. C. Takahashi, "Multiobjective shape optimizationof broad-band reflector antennas using the cone of efficient directions algorithm", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1223-1226, 2006.
2.
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal and T. Meyarivan, "A fast and elitist multi-objective geneticalgorithm: NSGA-II", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182-197, 2002.
3.
A. C. Lisboa, D. A. G. Vieira, J. A. Vasconcelos, R. R. Saldanha and R. H. C. Takahashi, "Decreasing interference insatellite broadband communication systems using modeled reflector antennas", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 958-961, 2008.
4.
D. A. G. Vieira, A. C. Lisboa, R. R. Saldanha and R. H. C. Takahashi, "An enhanced ellipsoid methodfor electromagnetic devices optimization and design", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 2843-2851, 2010.
5.
6.
K. Deb, Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, New York:Wiley-Interscience Series in Systems and Optimization, 2001.
7.
D. H. Wolpert and W. G. Macready, "No free lunch theorems foroptimization", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67-82, 1997.
8.
R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MA, Cambridge:MIT Press, 1998.
9.
P. Di Barba, "Evolutionary multiobjectiveoptimization methods for the shape design of industrial electromagnetic devices", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1436-1441, 2009.
10.
E. F. Wanner, F. G. Guimares, R. H. C. Takahashi, D. A. Lowther and J. A. Ramrez, "Multiobjective memetic algorithmswith quadratic approximation-based local search for expensive optimizationin electromagnetics", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1126-1129, 2008.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.