Assessing the Impact of Student Peer Review in Writing Instruction by Using the Normalized Compression Distance | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Assessing the Impact of Student Peer Review in Writing Instruction by Using the Normalized Compression Distance


Abstract:

Research Problem: Studies identify peer review as an effective instructional method to improve student writing. Some teachers, however, avoid peer review, perhaps due to ...Show More

Abstract:

Research Problem: Studies identify peer review as an effective instructional method to improve student writing. Some teachers, however, avoid peer review, perhaps due to the workload required for assessing and correcting peer reviews. Previous studies have not proposed any method to reduce teacher workload by using an objective means to analyze the effects of peer review. Research Questions: This study assesses the degree of similarity between student essay drafts using normalized compression distance (NCD), a compression-based classification algorithm. How does peer review affect student essays, as measured by the NCD? What were the changes in essay length and holistic scores? How did students respond to peer essays? How did peer review affect students during revision? What were the NCD results? How did holistic scoring correspond to NCD results? Literature Review: Studies of pharmacists and engineers indicate that English language technical communication skills are important. Studies of peer review in language education indicate that peer comments are valuable but cultural differences and lack of confidence may impede making or using comments. Studies of NCD applied to web data, figures, and images indicate useful results. Methodology: This quantitative study used anonymous peer review and compared the results of traditional holistic scoring against a novel NCD measure. The researchers conducted the study with 35 student volunteers at a pharmaceutical university in Tokyo, Japan. The students had at least nine years of previous English instruction and previous peer-review experience. In class, students wrote an essay, anonymously reviewed a peer's essay according to instructions, then revised their own essays based on peer comments. An assessor graded the two drafts using a holistic scoring rubric. The researchers used NCD to quantify the change between drafts. Results and Discussion: Sixty percent of revisions contained more words than the originals. 51% percent o...
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication ( Volume: 55, Issue: 1, March 2012)
Page(s): 85 - 96
Date of Publication: 30 December 2011

ISSN Information:

No metrics found for this document.

I.

Good communication skills are essential for most types of employment. For pharmacists, as health-care professionals, clear communication skills become crucial during medication counseling to ensure that important messages and significant information are conveyed to their patients. In Japan, the role of pharmacists has attracted great attention during the past decade and, thus, the period of education necessary to acquire a pharmacist's license was extended from four years to six years in 2006. Since the health-care industry requires communication skills, such as providing patients with a lucid and convincing explanation, the education to become an efficient communicator is necessary for prospective pharmacists. Part of this education should involve training to help pharmacists develop efficient communication skills and, in particular, technical writing skills. These skills would become very important for successful communication. Until quite recently, however, this aspect was overlooked in pharmacy education in Japan. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an effective instructional method that helps educate pharmacy students to develop good technical writing skills. For the purpose of this education, the first author of the present study has adopted peer-review activities to her foreign language writing classes and has been researching the effectiveness of this method.

Usage
Select a Year
2025

View as

Total usage sinceJan 2012:993
012345JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec324000000000
Year Total:9
Data is updated monthly. Usage includes PDF downloads and HTML views.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.