Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
TSK Fuzzy Function Approximators: Design and Accuracy Analysis | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

TSK Fuzzy Function Approximators: Design and Accuracy Analysis


Abstract:

Fuzzy systems are excellent approximators of known functions or for the dynamic response of a physical system. We propose a new approach to approximate any known function...Show More

Abstract:

Fuzzy systems are excellent approximators of known functions or for the dynamic response of a physical system. We propose a new approach to approximate any known function by a Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy system with a guaranteed upper bound on the approximation error. The new approach is also used to approximately represent the behavior of a dynamic system from its input-output pairs using experimental data with known error bounds. We provide sufficient conditions for this class of fuzzy systems to be universal approximators with specified error bounds. The new conditions require a smaller number of membership functions than all previously published conditions. We illustrate the new results and compare them to published error bounds through numerical examples.
Page(s): 702 - 712
Date of Publication: 02 December 2011

ISSN Information:

PubMed ID: 22155964
Citations are not available for this document.

I. Introduction

A class of fuzzy systems is a universal approximator if, for any real continuous function on a compact set, there exists a fuzzy system from this class that can approximate the function to any degree of accuracy [1], [2]. The universal approximation capabilities of fuzzy systems have been discussed extensively in the literature. Many different classes of fuzzy systems have been analyzed and proven to have the universal approximation property [3], [4]. However, the universal approximation property of fuzzy systems is only one aspect of designing a fuzzy function approximator. A critical question is the following: how can one design a fuzzy system to approximate a given real continuous function? Here, the word design means choosing the shape of the membership functions, the number of fuzzy sets needed for each input variable, and the rule base.

Cites in Papers - |

Cites in Papers - IEEE (20)

Select All
1.
Erhao Zhou, Fu-Lai Chung, Shitong Wang, "Multiview Fully Interpretable TSK Fuzzy Classifier Enhanced by Multiview Accompanying GMMs", IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol.32, no.11, pp.6288-6302, 2024.
2.
Yuanpeng Zhang, Guanjin Wang, Ta Zhou, Ge Ren, Saikit Lam, Weiping Ding, Jing Cai, "Deep Reconciled and Self-Paced TSK Fuzzy System Ensemble for Imbalanced Data Classification: Architecture, Interpretability, and Theory", IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol.32, no.11, pp.6185-6198, 2024.
3.
Jun Wang, Zhuangzhuang Zhao, Zhaohong Deng, Kup-Sze Choi, Lejun Gong, Jun Shi, Shitong Wang, "Manifold-Regularized Multitask Fuzzy System Modeling With Low-Rank and Sparse Structures in Consequent Parameters", IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol.30, no.5, pp.1486-1500, 2022.
4.
Bin Qin, Fu-Lai Chung, Shitong Wang, "KAT: A Knowledge Adversarial Training Method for Zero-Order Takagi–Sugeno–Kang Fuzzy Classifiers", IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol.52, no.7, pp.6857-6871, 2022.
5.
Ebrahim Navid Sadjadi, Maryam Ebrahimi, Zahra Gachloo, "Discussion on Accuracy of Approximation with Smooth Fuzzy Models", 2020 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), pp.1-6, 2020.
6.
Imo Eyoh, Robert John, Geert De Maere, "Extended Kalman filter-based learning of interval type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy logic system", 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp.728-733, 2017.
7.
Salem B. Bacha, Barnabas Bede, "On Takagi Sugeno approximations of Mamdani fuzzy systems", 2016 Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS), pp.1-7, 2016.
8.
Xiaoyong Liu, Zhonggang Xiong, Liangui Chen, Zhenglong Zhu, "A new Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy approach of process modeling and fault detection", 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), pp.7126-7130, 2016.
9.
Barnabas Bede, Imre J. Rudas, Emil Daniel Schwab, Gabriela Schwab, "Approximation properties of Łukasiewicz Fuzzy Systems", 2015 Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS) held jointly with 2015 5th World Conference on Soft Computing (WConSC), pp.1-5, 2015.
10.
Yizhang Jiang, Fu-Lai Chung, Hisao Ishibuchi, Zhaohong Deng, Shitong Wang, "Multitask TSK Fuzzy System Modeling by Mining Intertask Common Hidden Structure", IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol.45, no.3, pp.534-547, 2015.
11.
Amira Aydi, Mohamed Djemel, Mohamed Chtourou, "On the fuzzy modeling of uncertain nonlinear systems", 2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA), pp.1055-1060, 2014.
12.
Xiaoyong Liu, Huajing Fang, "Nonlinear dynamic system modeling based on T-S fuzzy model with structural risk minimization", Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, pp.6637-6641, 2014.
13.
M. Sami Fadali, Saeed Jafarzadeh, "Stability Analysis of Positive Interval Type-2 TSK Systems With Application to Energy Markets", IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol.22, no.4, pp.1031-1038, 2014.
14.
Barnabas Bede, Imre J. Rudas, "Approximation properties of higher order Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems", 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), pp.368-373, 2013.
15.
Barnabas Bede, Matthew P. Peterson, "Approximation properties and continuous differentiability of a class of SISO fuzzy systems", 2013 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), pp.11-16, 2013.
16.
Chia-Feng Juang, Chi-You Chen, "Data-Driven Interval Type-2 Neural Fuzzy System With High Learning Accuracy and Improved Model Interpretability", IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol.43, no.6, pp.1781-1795, 2013.
17.
Saeed Jafarzadeh, M. Sami Fadali, Cansın Yaman Evrenosoglu, "Solar Power Prediction Using Interval Type-2 TSK Modeling", IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol.4, no.2, pp.333-339, 2013.
18.
Saeed Jafarzadeh, M. Sami Fadali, "On the Stability and Control of Continuous-Time TSK Fuzzy Systems", IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol.43, no.3, pp.1073-1087, 2013.
19.
Saeed Jafarzadeh, M. Sami Fadali, Mehdi Etezadi-Amoli, "Fuzzy type-1 and type-2 TSK modeling with application to solar power prediction", 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp.1-6, 2012.
20.
A. Sonbol, M.S. Fadali, "Improved fuzzy approximation accuracy using a linear TSK approach", Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003., vol.3, pp.2465-2470 vol.3, 2003.

Cites in Papers - Other Publishers (23)

1.
Marcin Jastrzębski, Jacek Kabziński, "Adaptive control of magnetic levitation system based on fuzzy inversion", Scientific Reports, vol.14, no.1, 2024.
2.
Shengli Zhang , Jing Chen , " Generalized Properties of\xa0Generalized Fuzzy Sets GFScom and\xa0Its Application ", Theoretical Computer Science , vol. 1944 , pp. 36 , 2024 .
3.
Jinghong Zhang, Yingying Li, Bowen Liu, Hao Chen, Jie Zhou, Hualong Yu, Bin Qin, "A Broad TSK Fuzzy Classifier with a Simplified Set of Fuzzy Rules for Class-Imbalanced Learning", Mathematics, vol.11, no.20, pp.4284, 2023.
4.
Yarong Li, Pengjiang Qian, Shuihua Wang, Shitong Wang, "Novel multi-view Takagi?Sugeno?Kang fuzzy system for epilepsy EEG detection", Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol.14, no.5, pp.5625, 2023.
5.
Runshan Xie, Shitong Wang, "A wide interpretable Gaussian Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy classifier and its incremental learning", Knowledge-Based Systems, pp.108203, 2022.
6.
Isaac Teoh Yi Zhe, Pantea Keikhosrokiani, "Knowledge workers mental workload prediction using optimised ELANFIS", Applied Intelligence, vol.51, no.4, pp.2406, 2021.
7.
Vaibhav B Joshi, Mehul S Raval, "Adaptive Threshold for Fingerprint Recognition System Based on Threat Level and System Load", Procedia Computer Science, vol.171, pp.498, 2020.
8.
S V Storozhev, V I Storozhev, V E Bolnokin, D I Mutin, E I Mutina, "Accounting of data uncertainty in advanced technological models of design calculations of acoustoelectronic components from piezoelectric materials", IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol.862, pp.022006, 2020.
9.
S V Storozhev, V I Storozhev, V E Bolnokin, Duong Minh Hai, D I Mutin, "Fuzzy-set analysis of models of temperature deformation of thin-walled elements with elliptic boundaries in industrial and aerospace structures", IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol.862, pp.022005, 2020.
10.
V G Vyskub, E I Mutina, S V Storozhev, V I Storozhev, "Model of fuzzy estimation of mechanical stress concentration for aerospace and industrial flat structures with polygonal holes of uncertain curvature at rounded corner points", IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol.537, pp.022013, 2019.
11.
K.V. Shihabudheen, M. Mahesh, G.N. Pillai, "Particle swarm optimization based extreme learning neuro-fuzzy system for regression and classification", Expert Systems with Applications, vol.92, pp.474, 2018.
12.
K.V. Shihabudheen, G.N. Pillai, "Recent advances in neuro-fuzzy system: A survey", Knowledge-Based Systems, vol.152, pp.136, 2018.
13.
Yongan Li, Peng Jiang, Qingshan She, Guang Lin, "Research on air pollutant concentration prediction method based on self-adaptive neuro-fuzzy weighted extreme learning machine", Environmental Pollution, vol.241, pp.1115, 2018.
14.
Barnabas Bede, Imre J. Rudas, Recent Developments and the New Direction in Soft-Computing Foundations and Applications, vol.361, pp.85, 2018.
15.
Shihabudheen KV, G.N. Pillai, "Regularized extreme learning adaptive neuro-fuzzy algorithm for regression and classification", Knowledge-Based Systems, vol.127, pp.100, 2017.
16.
Shihabudheen KV, G.N. Pillai, Bipin Peethambaran, "Prediction of landslide displacement with controlling factors using extreme learning adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ELANFIS)", Applied Soft Computing, vol.61, pp.892, 2017.
17.
K.V. Shihabudheen, Bipin Peethambaran, "Landslide displacement prediction technique using improved neuro-fuzzy system", Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol.10, no.22, 2017.
18.
Shengli Zhang, Yongming Li, "A novel table look-up scheme based on GFScom and its application", Soft Computing, 2016.
19.
Maria de los Angeles Hernandez, Patricia Melin, Gerardo M. Mendez, Oscar Castillo, Ismael Lopez-Juarez, "A hybrid learning method composed by the orthogonal least-squares and the back-propagation learning algorithms for interval A2-C1 type-1 non-singleton type-2 TSK fuzzy logic systems", Soft Computing, vol.19, no.3, pp.661, 2015.
20.
Carlos Ariño, Emilio Pérez, Antonio Sala, Fernando Bedate, "Polytopic invariant and contractive sets for closed-loop discrete fuzzy systems", Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol.351, no.7, pp.3559, 2014.
21.
Barnabas Bede, Imre J. Rudas, "Takagi-Sugeno Approximation of a Mamdani Fuzzy System", Advance Trends in Soft Computing, vol.312, pp.293, 2014.
22.
M.J. Gacto, M. Galende, R. Alcala, F. Herrera, "METSK-HDe: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to learn accurate TSK-fuzzy systems in high-dimensional and large-scale regression problems", Information Sciences, vol.276, pp.63, 2014.
23.
Xiaoyong Liu, Huajing Fang, Zhaoxu Chen, "A novel cost function based on decomposing least-square support vector machine for Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system identification", IET Control Theory & Applications, vol.8, no.5, pp.338-347, 2014.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.