Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A metrological comparison between different methods for harmonic pollution metering | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

A metrological comparison between different methods for harmonic pollution metering


Abstract:

Several proposals can be found, in literature, to split the responsibility for the injection of harmonic pollution between the different loads and between loads and sourc...Show More

Abstract:

Several proposals can be found, in literature, to split the responsibility for the injection of harmonic pollution between the different loads and between loads and source. The methods have been tested mainly by means of simulations performed on an industrial test system identified by the IEEE Task Force on Harmonic modeling and simulation. The main problem of simulation results is that they tend to disregard measurement uncertainty that, if not properly considered, might lead to an incorrect, or even impossible assessment of responsibility. This paper is therefore aimed at comparing the different available methods from a metrological point of view, in order to provide a wider and more complete basis for evaluating their performances.
Date of Conference: 28-30 September 2011
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 01 December 2011
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Aachen, Germany
References is not available for this document.

I. introduction

The diffusion and power of distorting electrical loads has constantly increased over the last decades, due to the high flexibility and efficiency of power electronics. A further diffusion is expected in the future, in the new smart-grid scenario, based on distributed generation, where almost every load can become virtually a generator.

Select All
1.
E. J. Davis, A. E. Emanuel, and D. J. Pileggi, "Harmonic pollution metering: theoretical considerations," IEEE Trans. Pow. Del., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19-23, 2000.
2.
E.J. Davis, A.E. Emanuel, and D.J. Pileggi, "Evaluation of singlepoint measurements method for harmonic pollution cost allocation," IEEE Trans. Pow. Del., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 14-18, Jan. 2000.
3.
J. A. Ghijselen and J. L. Willems, "Determining customer contribution to voltage distortion in power systems," in Proc. 6th Int. Workshop Power Definitions and Meas. Under Non-Sinusoidal Conditions, Milano, Italy, Oct. 13-15, 2003.
4.
L. Cristaldi, A. Ferrero, and S. Salicone, "A distributed system for electric power quality measurement," IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 776-781, 2002. (Pubitemid 35369695)
5.
D. Castaldo, A. Ferrero, S. Salicone, and A. Testa, "An index for assessing the responsibility for injecting periodic disturbances," L'Energia Elettrica, vol. 81-Ricerche, pp. 134-143, 2004.
6.
A. Ferrero, M. Prioli, and S. Salicone, "A fuzzy, metrology-sound approach to the identification of the sources injecting periodic disturbances in electric networks," IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas., vol. 60, no. 9, September 2011.
7.
A. Cataliotti and V. Cosentino, "Disturbing load detection in three-wire and four-wire systems based on novel nonactive powers from ieee 1459-2000," IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1082-1090, May 2010.
8.
A. Cataliotti and V. Cosentino, "Harmonic sources detection in power systems via nonactive power measurements according to ieee std. 1459-2010: Theoretical approach and experimental results," in 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements For Power Systems (AMPS), Sept. 2010, pp. 53-58.
9.
Task force on harmonics modelling and simulations, "Test systems for harmonic modelling and simulations," IEEE Trans. Pow. Del., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 579-587, 1999.
10.
R. Carbone, D. Castaldo, R. Langella, and A. Testa, "Probabilistic modeling of industrial systems for voltage distortion analysis," in 9th ICHQP, Orlando, USA, 2000, vol. 2, pp. 608-613.
11.
IEEE std 1459-2010, IEEE standard definitions for the measurement of electric power quantities under sinusoidal, nonsinusoidal, balanced or unbalanced conditions, IEEE Standard, March 2010.
12.
A. Ferrero, S. Salicone, and G. Todeschini, "A fuzzy method for the identification of the sources producing harmonic pollution in the electric network," in IMTC2007, Warsaw, Poland, may 2007, pp. 1-6.
13.
A. Ferrero, A. Menchetti, and R. Sasdelli, "Measurement of the electric power quality and related problems," ETEP, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 401-406, 1996.
14.
C. Muscas, "Assessment of electric power quality: indices for identifying disturbing loads," ETEP, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 287-292, 1998.
15.
A. Ferrero, M. Lazzaroni, and S. Salicone, "A calibration procedure for a digital instrument for electric power quality measurement," Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 716-722, Aug. 2002. (Pubitemid 35369686)
16.
A. Ferrero and S. Salicone, "The random-fuzzy variables: a new approach for the expression of uncertainty in measurement," IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1370-1377, 2004.
17.
A. Ferrero and S. Salicone, "The construction of random-fuzzy variables from the available relevant metrological information," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 58, pp. 1-11, 2009.
18.
A. Ferrero and S. Salicone, "Modeling and processing measurement uncertainty within the theory of evidence: Mathematics of random-fuzzy variables," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 704-716, 2007. (Pubitemid 46784536)
19.
A. Mencattini and S. Salicone, "A comparison between different methods for processing the random part of random-fuzzy variables representing measurement results," in AMUEM 2008, Sardagna, Trento, Italy, July 21-22, 2008, 2008, pp. 72-77.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.