Loading [a11y]/accessibility-menu.js
A framework to support investment decisions using multi-criteria and under uncertainty in IT service portfolio management | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

A framework to support investment decisions using multi-criteria and under uncertainty in IT service portfolio management


Abstract:

This paper presents a framework to support decision making for investments in IT services. Investment options are analyzed and ranked according to utility indices estimat...Show More

Abstract:

This paper presents a framework to support decision making for investments in IT services. Investment options are analyzed and ranked according to utility indices estimated from possible positive and negative business impact of IT services. The approach takes multiple criteria and uncertainty into account by means of multi-attribute utility theory and interval arithmetic. The business impact of IT services is estimated by the analysis of criteria in one of three groups: Purely financial, Service Level Agreement (SLA) dependent and Subjective. Numerical illustrations encompassing tangible and intangible criteria demonstrate how the approach may be of use.
Date of Conference: 19-23 April 2010
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 17 June 2010
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Osaka, Japan
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Chief Information Officers (CIOs) frequently face the challenge to decide how to distribute the corporate IT budget over the IT service portfolio. Business executives push them to both make visible the benefits resulting from IT investments and to improve return to the business.

Select All
1.
IT Infrastructure Library—ITIL, UK:Office of Government Commerce, 2007.
2.
R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1993.
3.
J.A. Oliveira, J.A.B Moura, C. Bartolini and M. Hickey, "Value-based IT Decision Support", Proceedings of BDIM09, 2009.
4.
Control Objectives for Business Information-related Technology COBIT.
5.
J.A.B. Moura, J.P. Sauvé and A. Boulmakoul, "A possibility theoretic model for decision support in Business-Driven IT Service Portfolio Management under Uncertainty", Proceedings of HP-SUA 2008, pp. 131-143.
6.
W.G. IA Marek, "Power and Beauty of Interval Methods", arXiv:physics/0302034v2 Domestic Conference on Evolutionary Algorithms and Global Optimization, pp. 8, May 26–29, 2003.
7.
J Neumann and O. von Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Commemorative Edition, Princeton University Press, 2007.
8.
B.H. Reich and I. Benzabat, "Measuring the Linkage between Business and Information Technology Objectives", Management Information Systems (MIS) quarterly, vol. 20, pp. 55-81, 1996.
9.
T. Pisello and Strassmann, IT Value Chain Management—Maximizing the ROI from IT Investments, Digital Publications from the Information Economics Press, 2004.
10.
D.E. Sichel, "Computers and Aggregate Economic Growth: An Update", Business Economics, vol. 34, no. 2, 1999.
11.
K.S. Inn, K.E. Dow and V. Grover, "A Reexamination of IT Investments and the Market value of the Firm—An Event Study Methodology", Information Systems Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 103-117, 2001.
12.
A. Dutta and R. Roy, "A Process-Oriented Framework for Justifying Information Technology Projects in e-Business Environments", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 9, no. 1, 2004.
13.
R. Stewart and S. Mohamed, "IT/IS projects selection using multicriteria utility theory", Logistics Information Management, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 254-270, 2002.
14.
R. Stewart, "A framework for the life cycle management of information technology projects: ProjectIT", International Journal of Project Management, vol. 26, pp. 203-212, 2008.
15.
Z. Hatush and M.R. Skitmore, "Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: an additive model" in Building and Environment, Elsevier, vol. 33, no. 2–3, pp. 105-115, 1998.
16.
K. Chen and N. Gorla, "Information System Project Selection Using Fuzzy Logic", IEEE Transactions on System Management and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 849-855, November 1998.
17.
C-T Chen and H-L. Cheng, "A comprehensive model for selecting information system project under fuzzy environment", International Journal of Project Management, 2008.
18.
A. Gunasekaran, E.W.T. Ngai and R.E. McGaughey, "Information technology and systems justification: A review for research and applications", European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 173, pp. 957-983, 2006.
19.
S. Mohamed and A.K. McCowan, "Modeling project investment decisions under uncertainty using possibility theory", International Journal of Project Management, vol. 19, pp. 231-24, 2001.
20.
D. Baccarini, G. Salm and P.E.D. Love, "Management of risks in information technology projects", Industrial Management Data Systems, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 286-295, 2004.
21.
J.W. Lee and S.H. Kim, "Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection", Computers Operations Research, vol. 27, pp. 367-382, 2000.
22.
D. Lan-ying and S. Yong-dong, "Implement Business Strategy via Project Portfolio Management: A Model and Case Study", Journal of American Academy of Business, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 239-244, September 2007.
23.
R. Kaplan and D. Norton, "The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance", Harvard Business Review, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 71-79, 1992.
24.
M. J. S. Queiroz, J. A. B Moura, J.P Sauvé, C. Bartolini and M. Hickey, "A Model for Decision Support in Business-Driven IT Service Portfolio Management using SLA-dependent Criteria and under Uncertainty", Proceedings of ACM MEDES09 Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, 2009.
25.
J.A.B. Moura, Survey and Interviews on IT Financial Management, 2008.
26.
M. J. S. Queiroz, Usage session of an ITSPM framework, 2009.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.