Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/autoload/mtable.js
Correcting Airborne Laser Scanning Intensity Data for Automatic Gain Control Effect | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Correcting Airborne Laser Scanning Intensity Data for Automatic Gain Control Effect


Abstract:

The intensity data recorded by airborne laser scanning (ALS) systems are useful for several applications, e.g., automatic point classification, change detection, and envi...Show More

Abstract:

The intensity data recorded by airborne laser scanning (ALS) systems are useful for several applications, e.g., automatic point classification, change detection, and environmental studies. Before the intensity values can be used for any specific application, it has to be calibrated for atmospheric effect, range, energy loss, and incidence angle. Some ALS systems use automatic gain control (AGC). AGC is useful for getting laser returns even from low-reflectance surfaces (e.g., dark roofs), but it also changes the recorded intensity during the data acquisition, even within one surface type. This means that the same asphalt road might have totally different intensity values depending on the surrounding environment, which has affected the state of the AGC level. Therefore, it is important to correct the intensity values to neglect the effect of AGC in order to be able to get a normalized intensity value, which is only affected by the target characteristics. A first approach to correct the intensity values for AGC is reported in this letter. The same area was flown with AGC on and off, which allowed the modeling to take place. The results showed that the model produces values that agreed with an R2 of 0.76 to the intensities obtained when AGC was turned off.
Published in: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters ( Volume: 7, Issue: 3, July 2010)
Page(s): 511 - 514
Date of Publication: 25 February 2010

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) has become a leading method for collecting 3-D range data in remote sensing. In addition to the 3-D coordinates (), ALS systems record the intensity values for laser returns. Those intensity values can be used for several applications, e.g., change detection, forest measurements, and object classification [1]–[10]. The intensity of received laser return depends on several system and target properties and also on flight parameters. The received intensity can be well described by radar equation [11] P_{r} = {P_{t}D_{r}^{2} \over 4\pi R^{4}\beta_{t}^{2}}\eta_{{\rm sys}}\eta_{{\rm atm}}\sigma\eqno{\hbox{(1)}}

where is the received signal power (watts), is the transmitted signal power (watts), is the diameter of receiver aperture (meters), is the range from the sensor to the target (meters), is the laser beamwidth (radians), is the system transmission factor, is the atmospheric transmission factor, and is the target cross section (square meters). Equation (1) shows that the received power depends on the properties of the ALS system, range from the sensor to the object, atmospheric conditions during the measurements, and the laser footprint size on the target. Thus, the intensity values have to be corrected for atmospheric conditions, range, pulse energy, and incidence angle, particularly if the survey has included the use of several field-of-view angles or pulse-repetition frequencies (PRFs).

Select All
1.
R. A. Hill and R. K. Broughton, "Mapping the understory of deciduous woodland from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data: A case study in lowland Britain", ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 223-233, 2009.
2.
W. Wagner, M. Hollaus, C. Briese and V. Ducic, "3D vegetation mapping using small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanners", Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1433-1452, Mar. 2008.
3.
X. Yu, J. Hyypp, A. Kukko, M. Maltamo and H. Kaartinen, "Change detection techniques for canopy height growth measurements using airborne laser scanner data", Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 1339-1348, 2006.
4.
M. Dalponte, L. Bruzzone and D. Gianelle, "Fusion of hyperspectral and LIDAR remote sensing data for classification of complex forest areas", IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1416-1427, May 2008.
5.
J.-S. Yoon, J.-I. Shin and K.-S. Lee, "Land cover characteristics of airborne LiDAR intensity data: A case study", IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 801-805, Oct. 2008.
6.
C. Hopkinson and L. Chasmer, "Testing LiDAR models of fractional cover across multiple forest ecozones", Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 275-288, Jan. 2009.
7.
L. Chasmer, C. Hopkinson, B. Smith and P. Treitz, "Examining the influence of changing laser pulse repetition frequencies on conifer forest canopy returns", Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 1359-1367, 2006.
8.
M. Hollaus, W. Wagner, B. Maier and K. Schadauer, "Airborne laser scanning of forest stem volume in a mountainous environment", Sensors, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1559-1577, 2007.
9.
C. Briese, B. Hfle, H. Lehner, W. Wagner, M. Pfennigbauer and A. Ullrich, "Calibration of full-waveform airborne laser scanning data for object classification", Proc. SPIE, vol. 6950, pp. 69500H, Apr. 2008.
10.
D. S. Boyd and R. A. Hill, "Validation of airborne LIDAR intensity values from a forested landscape using HyMap data: Preliminary analyses", Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 36, pp. 71-76, 2007.
11.
W. Wagner, A. Ullrich, T. Melzer, C. Briese and K. Kraus, "From single-pulse to full-waveform airborne laser scanners: Potential and practical challenges", Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 35, no. B3, pp. 201-206, 2004.
12.
F. Coren and P. Sterzai, "Radiometric correction in laser scanning", Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 27, no. 15/16, pp. 3097-3104, 2006.
13.
W. Wagner, J. Hyypp, A. Ullrich, H. Lehner, C. Briese and S. Kaasalainen, "Radiometric calibration of full-waveform small-footprint airborne laser scanners", Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 37, no. B1, pp. 163-168, 2008.
14.
B. Hfle and N. Pfeifer, "Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches", ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 415-433, 2007.
15.
E. P. Baltsavias, "Airborne laser scanning: Basic relations and formulas", ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 54, no. 2/3, pp. 199-214, Jul. 1999.
16.
S. Kaasalainen, E. Ahokas, J. Hyypp and J. Suomalainen, "Study of surface brightness from backscattered laser intensity: Calibration of laser data", IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 255-259, Jul. 2005.
17.
S. Kaasalainen, A. Kukko, T. Lindroos, P. Litkey, H. Kaartinen, J. Hyypp, et al., "Brightness measurements and calibration with airborne and terrestrial laser scanners", IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 528-534, Feb. 2008.
18.
A. Vain, S. Kaasalainen, U. Pyysalo, A. Krooks and P. Litkey, "Use of naturally available reference targets to calibrate airborne laser scanning intensity data", Sensors, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2780-2796, 2009.
19.
E. Ahokas, S. Kaasalainen, J. Hyypp and J. Suomalainen, "Calibration of the Optech 3100 laser scanner intensity data using brightness targets", Proc. ISPRS Commission I Symp. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 36, 2006.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.