A simplified approach to determine airspace complexity maps under automated conflict resolution | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

A simplified approach to determine airspace complexity maps under automated conflict resolution


Abstract:

This paper presents a new methodology for rapidly generating complexity maps for various configurations taking into account the influence of some conflict avoidance algor...Show More

Abstract:

This paper presents a new methodology for rapidly generating complexity maps for various configurations taking into account the influence of some conflict avoidance algorithm at a pair-wise intersection level. The complexity maps are based on analytical expressions, validated through simulations, of the probability of conflict and the spatial distribution of aircraft. This ¿closed-loop¿ analysis explicitly considers the role of the conflict resolution algorithm, here the offset method. It gives therefore a more realistic image of the current and future health of the considered airspace as a function of the encounter and aircraft flows characteristics. Some results of the usual ¿open-loop¿ approach are also validated, while highlighting their limitations.
Date of Conference: 23-29 October 2009
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 04 December 2009
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Orlando, FL, USA
References is not available for this document.

Introduction

Air traffic is predicted to grow worldwide in the coming decades. In many enroute regions air traffic is expected to exceed current capacity limits, i.e. the maximum number of aircraft allowed in a given airspace, as defined by controllers. To accommodate high levels of throughput, while maintaining safety, semi-automated and fully-automated conflict resolution algorithms will be required as a support tool for the air traffic controllers [1]. One of the principle goals of the research in defining complexity maps is to objectively and accurately determine the capacity of a given element of an airspace (sector), since there are significant costs associated with miscalculating airspace capacity: an underestimated capacity leads to underutilized airspace and unnecessary holds and rerountings, whereas an overestimated capacity may lead to congestion delays or safety breaches with respect to minimum aircraft separation. This study is a first step aimed at determining the complexity of an airspace under automated conflict resolution control. In this study, we consider then with the airspace as a “closed-loop” system, where the automated conflict resolution control can be seen as the feedback loop. This method should allow air traffic managers/controllers to predict in real-time airspace complexity for a given traffic configuration (routes and flow rates characteristics), and then could be considered as an easy-to-use airspace health prediction tool for the air traffic managers.

Select All
1.
"Joint Planning and Development Office. Next generation air transportation system integrated work plan: A functional outline", Technical report, September 2008.
2.
I.V. Laudeman, S.G. Shelden, R. Branstrom and C.L. Brasil, "Dynamic density: An air traffic management metric", Ames Research Center-112226, 1998.
3.
B. Sridhar, K.S. Sheth and S. Grabbe, "Airspace complexity and its application in air traffic management", In 2 nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R Seminar, 1998.
4.
D. Delahaye, S. Puechmorel, J. Hansman and J. Histon, "Air traffic complexity based on non linear dynamical systems", In USA-Europe ATM R Seminar, 2003.
5.
D. Delahaye, S. Puechmorel, J. Hansman and J. Histon, "Air traffic complexity map based on non linear dynamical systems", Air Traffic Control Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 367-390, 2004.
6.
A. Yousefi and G.L. Donohue, "Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Airspace Complexity for Air Traffic Controller Workload-Based Sectorization", In AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conf., pp. 6455-6468, 2004.
7.
M. Prandini, V. Putta and J. Hu, "A probabilistic measure of air traffic complexity in three-dimensional airspace", Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process, vol. 1, pp. 1-25, 2009.
8.
R.A. Paielli and H. Erzberger, "Conflict probability estimation for free flight", Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 588-596, 1997.
9.
R. Irvine, "A simplified approach to conflict probability estimation", In Proc. of the 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, vol. 2, pp. 7F5/1-7F5/12, 2001.
10.
R. Irvine, "A geometrical approach to conflict probability estimation", Air Traffic Control Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 85-113, 2002.
11.
H.A.P. Blom, G.J. Bakker, M.H.C. Everdij and M.N.J. Van der Park, "Collision risk modeling of air traffic", In Proceedings of European Control Conference, 2003.
12.
H.A.P. Blom and G.J. Bakker, "Conflict probability and incrossing probability in air traffic management", In Proc. of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 3, pp. 2421-2426, 2002.
13.
Z.-H. Mao and E. Feron, "Stability and performance of intersecting aircraft flows under sequential conflict resolution", In Proc. 2001 American Control Conference, 2001.
14.
K. Treleaven and Z.-H. Mao, "Conflict Resolution and Traffic Complexity of Multiple Intersecting Flows of Aircraft", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation systems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 633-643, 2008.
15.
M. Gariel and E. Feron, "Graceful Degradation of Air Traffic Operations: Airspace Sensitivity to Degraded Surveillance Systems", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 2028-2039, 2008.
16.
L. Pallottino, E. Feron and A. Bicchi, "Conflict resolution problems for air traffic management systems solved with mixed integer programming", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2002.
17.
A. Vela, S. Solak, W. Singhose and J.-P. Clarke, "A mixed integer program for flight-level assignment and speed control for conflict resolution", In Proc. of the 2009 Conference on Decision and Control, 2009.
18.
A. Vela, E. Salaun, S. Solak, E. Feron, W. Singhose and J.-P. Clarke, "A two-stage stochastic optimization model for air traffic conflict resolution under wind uncertainty", In Proc. of the 28th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2009.
19.
K. Lee, E. Feron and A. Pritchett, "Air traffic complexity: An input-output approach", In American Control Conference 2007, pp. 474-479, 2007.
20.
K. Lee, E. Feron and A. Pritchett, "Describing Airspace Complexity: Airspace Response to Disturbances", Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, vol. 32, no. 1, 2009.
21.
Z.-H. Mao, E. Feron and K. Bilimoria, "Stability and performance of intersecting aircraft flows under decentralized conflict avoidance rules", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 101-109, 2001.
22.
S.M. Ross, "Stochastic processes" in , Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics, 1996.
23.
D. Moreau and S. Roy, "A stochastic characterization of en route traffic flow management strategies", In Proc. of the AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 6274-6285, 2005.
24.
J-P.B. Clarke, S. Solak, Y.-H. Chang, L. Ren and A.E. Vela, "Air trafic Flow Management in the Presence of Uncertainty", In USA-Europe ATM R Seminar, 2009.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.