Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A simplified approach to determine airspace complexity maps under automated conflict resolution | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

A simplified approach to determine airspace complexity maps under automated conflict resolution


Abstract:

This paper presents a new methodology for rapidly generating complexity maps for various configurations taking into account the influence of some conflict avoidance algor...Show More

Abstract:

This paper presents a new methodology for rapidly generating complexity maps for various configurations taking into account the influence of some conflict avoidance algorithm at a pair-wise intersection level. The complexity maps are based on analytical expressions, validated through simulations, of the probability of conflict and the spatial distribution of aircraft. This ¿closed-loop¿ analysis explicitly considers the role of the conflict resolution algorithm, here the offset method. It gives therefore a more realistic image of the current and future health of the considered airspace as a function of the encounter and aircraft flows characteristics. Some results of the usual ¿open-loop¿ approach are also validated, while highlighting their limitations.
Date of Conference: 23-29 October 2009
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 04 December 2009
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Citations are not available for this document.

Introduction

Air traffic is predicted to grow worldwide in the coming decades. In many enroute regions air traffic is expected to exceed current capacity limits, i.e. the maximum number of aircraft allowed in a given airspace, as defined by controllers. To accommodate high levels of throughput, while maintaining safety, semi-automated and fully-automated conflict resolution algorithms will be required as a support tool for the air traffic controllers [1]. One of the principle goals of the research in defining complexity maps is to objectively and accurately determine the capacity of a given element of an airspace (sector), since there are significant costs associated with miscalculating airspace capacity: an underestimated capacity leads to underutilized airspace and unnecessary holds and rerountings, whereas an overestimated capacity may lead to congestion delays or safety breaches with respect to minimum aircraft separation. This study is a first step aimed at determining the complexity of an airspace under automated conflict resolution control. In this study, we consider then with the airspace as a “closed-loop” system, where the automated conflict resolution control can be seen as the feedback loop. This method should allow air traffic managers/controllers to predict in real-time airspace complexity for a given traffic configuration (routes and flow rates characteristics), and then could be considered as an easy-to-use airspace health prediction tool for the air traffic managers.

Cites in Papers - |

Cites in Papers - IEEE (1)

Select All
1.
Troy Hand, Zhi-Hong Mao, Eric Feron, "Stability of spatially distributed, intersecting aircraft flows under sequential conflict resolution schemes", Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, pp.2168-2173, 2011.

Cites in Papers - Other Publishers (3)

1.
Erwan Salaun, Maxime Gariel, Adan E. Vela, Eric Feron, "Aircraft Proximity Maps Based on Data-Driven Flow Modeling", Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol.35, no.2, pp.563, 2012.
2.
Erwan Salaün, Maxime Gariel, Adan Vela, Eric Feron, John-Paul Clarke, "Airspace Complexity Estimations Based on Data-Driven Flow Modeling", AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2010.
3.
Erwan Salaün, Maxime Gariel, Adan Vela, Eric Feron, John-Paul Clarke, "Airspace Statistical Proximity Maps Based on Data-Driven Flow Modeling", AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2010, 2010.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.