Abstract:
Digital X-ray imaging detectors designed for soft X-rays (1 to 50 keV) are significant for medical mammography, dental radiography, microradiography, and microtomography....Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
Digital X-ray imaging detectors designed for soft X-rays (1 to 50 keV) are significant for medical mammography, dental radiography, microradiography, and microtomography. Detector designs involve either direct absorption of X-rays in solid state devices or thin scintillator screens optically coupled to solid state sensors. Well designed scintillator systems produce 10 or more electrons per detected X-ray and, used with charge coupled devices (CCD), detect 100,000 X-rays per pixel before saturation. However, if the scintillator is directly coupled to the detector, radiation can penetrate to the semiconductor detector with a small number of events producing large charge and noise. The authors have investigated the degradation of image noise by these direct absorption events using numerical models for a laboratory detector system consisting of a 60 /spl mu/m CsI scintillator optically coupled to a scientific CCD. Monte Carlo methods were used to estimate the charge deposition signal and noise for both the CsI and the semiconductor. Without a fiber optic coupler, direct absorptions dominate the signal and increase the signal variance by a factor of about 30 at energies above 10 keV. With a 3 mm fiber optic coupler, no significant degradation is observed for input energies below 45 keV.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science ( Volume: 43, Issue: 4, August 1996)
DOI: 10.1109/23.531897
References is not available for this document.
Select All
1.
P. Burstein and J. M. Davis, "The detection of soft x-rays with charge coupled detectors" in X-ray Microscopy, Springer-Verlag, 1984.
2.
C. Tassin, Y. Thenoz and J. Chabbal, "Thinned backside illuminated CCDs for ultraviolet soft x-ray and electron beam imaging", X-ray Instrumentation in Medicine and Biology Plasma Physics Astrophysics and Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 1140, 1989.
3.
D. M. Brown, M. Ghezzo and M. Garfinkel, "Transparent metal oxide electrode CID imager", IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 196-200, 1976.
4.
L. Strüder, G. Lutz and M. Sterzik, "First tests with fully depleted pn-CCDs", IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 372-376, February 1988.
5.
T. J. Sumner, G. K. Rochester and G. Hall, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A, vol. 273, pp. 701, 1988.
6.
L. Strüder, "Recent developments in semiconductor detectors and on-chip electronics", Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 283, pp. 387-398, 1989.
7.
G. W. Fraser, "X-ray detectors: A review", X-ray Instrumentation in Medicine and Biology Plasma Physics Astrophysics and Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 1140, 1989.
8.
W. Zhao, J.A. Rowlands, S. Germann, D. Waechter and Z. Huang, "Digital radiology using self-scanned readout of amorphous selenium: design considerations for mammography", Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 2432, pp. 250-259, 1995.
9.
D. L. Lee, L. S. Jeromin and L. K. Cheung, "New digital detector for projection radiography", In Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 2432, 1995.
10.
E. F. Eikenberry, M. W. Tate, A. L. Belmonte, J. L. Lowrance, D. Bilderback and S. M. Gruner, "A direct-coupled detector for synchrotron x-radiation using a large format CCD", IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 110-118, 1991.
11.
P Brian, "Flannery and W.G. Roberge. Observational strategies for three-dimensional sychrotron microtomography", Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 4668-4674, December 1987.
12.
J. M. Boone, J. Duryea and J. A. Seibert, "Imaging performance of a terbium-doped fiber optic screen for diagnostic imaging", In Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 2163, pp. 64-72, 1994.
13.
M. Ito, M. Yamaguchi and K. Oba, "CsI(Na) scintillation plate with high spatial resolution", IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. NS-34, no. 1, pp. 401-405, February 1987.
14.
B. Allen, "Application of CCDs to digital X-ray mammography", Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 2163, 1994.
15.
L. Kay and D. A. Sadler, "A method for processing CCD images to remove cosmic rays and other randomly positioned spurious events - theory and experiment", Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, pp. 532-535, 1991.
16.
F. Biggs and R. Lighthill, Analytical approximations of x-ray cross sections II, 1971.
17.
J. H. Hubbell, W. J. Veigle, E. A. Briggs, R. T. Brown, D. T. Cromer and R. J. Howerton, I. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, vol. 4, pp. 471, 1975.
18.
J. H. Hubbell and I. Øverbø, "Relativistic atomic form factors and photon coherent scattering cross sections", J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69-105, 1979.
19.
J. A. Halbleib and J. E. Morel, Improved atomic shell excitation and relaxation in the Tiger series codes, 1978.
20.
S. J. Wilderman, Vectorized Algorithms for the Monte Carlo Simulation of Kilovolt Electron and Photon Transport, 1990.
21.
G. F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, New York:Wiley, 1989.
22.
H. Liu, A. Karellas, L. Harris and C. D'Orsi, "Optical properties of fiber tapers and their impact on the performance of a fiberoptically coupled CCD X-ray imaging system", Clinical Applications of Modern Imaging Technology, vol. 1894, 1993.
23.
R. K. Swank, "Measurement of absorption and noise in an x-ray image intensifier", J. Appl. Phys., vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 3673-3678, August 1974.
24.
J. A. Rowlands and K. W. Taylor, "Absorption and noise in cesium iodide x-ray image intensifiers", Med. Phys., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 786-795, Nov/Dec 1983.