The research overview on forming mechanism and effect of the sports organizational justice | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

The research overview on forming mechanism and effect of the sports organizational justice


Abstract:

The study based on reading a great deal of relevant literature, discuss the concept of sports organizational justice combining with the sports professional characteristic...Show More

Abstract:

The study based on reading a great deal of relevant literature, discuss the concept of sports organizational justice combining with the sports professional characteristics. Moreover, deeply discusses forming mechanism of sports organizational justice and the action effect of sports organizational justice and the relationship of sports organizational justice and organization outcome variable.
Date of Conference: 08-09 August 2009
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 29 September 2009
Print ISBN:978-1-4244-4247-8

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Sanya, China
References is not available for this document.

I. The meaning of sports organizational justice

The sports organization is the entity of a pursuit goal, established in order to realize a particular goal. All sport organization executives will make decisions affecting the organization operation and employee action according to the requirement of organizational goals. During the process of achieving the goal, whether the members could be fairly treated on their payment, welfare, promotion, assessment, information and respect is an important basis for examining the justice of the organization.

Select All
1.
DanielF.Mahony, Harold A.Riemer, James L.Breeding & Mary A.Hums.Organizational Justice in Sport Organizations:Perceptions of College Athletes and Other College Students[J].Journal of Sport Management,2006,20,159- 188.
2.
STEVE WILLIAMS, RICHARD PITRE & MOHAMED ZAINUBA.Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Intentions: Fair Rewards Versus Fair Treatments[J].The Journal of Social Psychology,2002, 142(1),33-44.
3.
Yi-Jung Chen. Associations of Organizational Justice and Ingratiation with Organizational Citizenship Behavior: the Beneficiary Perspective[J].SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY,2008, 36 (3),289-302.
4.
Colquitt,J.A.,DonaldE.Conlon,MichaelJ.Wesson,ChristopherO. L.H.Porter&K.YeeNg,2001.JusticeattheMillennium:AMetaanalyticReview of 25YearsofOrganizationalJusticeResearch[J].JournalofAppliedPsyc hology,86(3):425-445.
5.
Cropanzano R,Greenberg J.Progress in organizational justice :Tunneling through the maze[A].In Cooper CL,Robertson IT.International review of industrial and organizational psychology[C].John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
6.
Colquitt J A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice.A construct validation of a measure[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86.
7.
Cropanzano R,Byrne Z S, Bobocel D R,et al. Moral virtues,fairness heuristics,social entities,and other denizens of organizational justice [J].Journal of Vocational Behavior,2001,58.
8.
Tyler T R ,Lind E A. A relational model of authority in groups[A].In Zanna M. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25)[M].San Diego : Academic Press,1992.
9.
Folger R. Fairness as a moral virtue[A].In Schminke M.Managerial ethics:Moral management of people and processes[M].Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,1998.
10.
FolgerRobert,1994.WorkplaceJusticeandEmployeeWorth[J].So cial JusticeResearch,7:225-241.
11.
MontadaLeo,1998.Justice:JustaRationalChoice[J].SocialJustice Research,11(2):81-101.
12.
CropanzanoRussell,BarryGoldman&RobertFolger.2003.The DeonticJustice:TheRoleofMoralPrinciplesinWorkplaceFairness[J].J ournal ofOrganizationalBehavior,24(8):1019-1024.
13.
FolgerRobert&RussellCropanzano.1998.OrganizationalJustice and Human Resource Management[M].Thousand,CA:Sage.
14.
Colquitt,JasonA.&JeraldGreenberg,2003.OrganizationalJustice :A FairAssessmentoftheStateoftheLiterature[A].InGreenbergGerald(E ds.).OrganizationalBehavior:The Stateof the Science[C].Mahwal:Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesPublishers.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.