Processing math: 100%
Direction of Arrival Estimation in the Presence of Noise Coupling in Antenna Arrays | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Direction of Arrival Estimation in the Presence of Noise Coupling in Antenna Arrays


Abstract:

The direction of arrival (DOA) estimation problem in the presence of signal and noise coupling in antenna arrays is addressed. In many applications, such as smart antenna...Show More

Abstract:

The direction of arrival (DOA) estimation problem in the presence of signal and noise coupling in antenna arrays is addressed. In many applications, such as smart antenna, radar and navigation systems, the noise coupling between different antenna array elements is often neglected in the antenna modeling and thus, may significantly degrade the system performance. Utilizing the exact noise covariance matrix enables to achieve high-performance source localization by taking into account the colored properties of the array noise. The noise covariance matrix of the antenna array consists of both the external noise sources from sky, ground and interference, and the internal noise sources from amplifiers and loads. Computation of the internal noise covariance matrix is implemented using the theory of noisy linear networks combined with the method of moments (MoM). Based on this noise statistical analysis, a new four-port antenna element consisting of two orthogonal loops is proposed with enhanced source localization performance. The maximum likelihood (ML) estimator and the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for DOA estimation in the presence of noise coupling is derived. Simulation results show that the noise coupling in antenna arrays may substantially alter the source localization performance. The performance of a mismatched ML estimator based on a model which ignores the noise coupling shows significant performance degradation due to noise coupling. These results demonstrate the importance of the noise coupling modeling in the DOA estimation algorithms.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation ( Volume: 55, Issue: 7, July 2007)
Page(s): 1940 - 1947
Date of Publication: 09 July 2007

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The noise statistics in a receiving system is important to determine its performance. The noise statistical information at the receiving ports of the sensor array is assumed to be known for implementation of optimal source localization methods [1]. In noise analysis of typical receiving arrays, it is often assumed that the port noises are statistically independent [2]–[4]. This implicit assumption is rarely satisfied due to mutual coupling and environmental noise. The effect of noise statistics mis-specification significantly degrades the performances of most high-resolution array processing algorithms [5], [6].

Select All
1.
H. Krim and M. Viberg, "Two decades of array signal processing research: The parametricapproach", IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 67-94, Jul. 1996.
2.
N. Amitay, V. Galindo and C. P. Wu, Theory and Analysis of Phased Array Antennas, New York:Wiley-InterScience, pp. 13-36, 1972.
3.
B. Steinberg, Principles of Aperture and Array System Design, New York:Wiley-InterScience, pp. 81-87, 1976.
4.
A. Nehorai and E. Paldi, "Vector-sensor array processing for electromagnetic sourcelocalization", IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 42, pp. 376-398, Feb. 1994.
5.
A. Swindlehurst and T. Kailath, "A performance analysis of subspacebasedmethods in the presence of model errors-Part I: The MUSIC algorithm", IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 40, pp. 1758-1774, Jul. 1992.
6.
J. X. Zhu and H. Wang, "Effects of sensor position and pattern perturbations onCRLB for direction finding of narrow-band sources", Proc. 4th Acoust. Speech Signal Processing Workshop Spectral Estimation Modeling, pp. 98-102, 1988-Aug.
7.
J. Tabrikian, R. Shavit and D. Rahamim, "An efficient vector sensor configurationfor source localization", IEEE Signal Process. Lett., Aug. 2004.
8.
H. Hui, "Improved compensation for the mutual coupling effect ina dipole array for direction finding", IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 51, pp. 2498-2503, Sep. 2003.
9.
R. S. Adve and T. K. Sarkar, "Compensation for the effects of mutual couplingon direct data domain adaptive algorithms", IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 48, pp. 86-94, Jan. 2000.
10.
J. Wallace and M. Jensen, "Mutual coupling in MIMO wireless systems:A rigorous network theory analysis", IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1317-1325, Jul. 2004.
11.
B. Lindmark, " Capacity of a 2 times 2 MIMO antenna system with mutual couplinglosses ", Proc. IEEE Antennas Propag. Society Symp., vol. 2, pp. 1720-1723, 2004-Jun.
12.
M. L. Morris and M. A. Jensen, "Network model for MIMO systems with coupledantennas and noisy amplifiers", IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, pp. 545-552, Jan. 2005.
13.
C. Craeye, B. Parvais and X. Dardenne, "MoM simulation of signal-to-noise patternsin infinite and finite receiving antenna arrays", IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 52, pp. 3245-3256, Dec. 2004.
14.
K. F. Warnick and M. A. Jensen, "Effects of mutual coupling on interferencemitigation with a focal plane array", IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, pp. 2490-2498, Aug. 2005.
15.
H. A. Haus and R. B. Adler, Circuit Theory of Linear Noisy Networks, New York:Technology Press, Wiley, pp. 19-27, 1959.
16.
R. F. Harrington, Field Computation by Moment Methods, FL, Melbourne:Kreiger, 1968.
17.
R. E. Collin, Antennas and Radiowave Propagation, New York:McGraw-Hill, 1985.
18.
R. Twiss, "Nyquist's and Thévenin's theorem generalized fornonreciprocal linear networks", J. Appl. Phys., vol. 26, pp. 599-599, 1955.
19.
H. Bosma, "On the theory of linear noisy systems", Phillips Res. Repts. Suppl., vol. 10, 1967.
20.
J. Engberg and T. Larsen, Noise Theory of Linear and Nonlinear Circuits, New York:Wiley, 1995.
21.
W. Brisken and C. Craeye, Focal Plane Array Beam-Forming and Spill-Over Cancellation Using Vivaldi Antennas, 2004, [online] Available: .
22.
S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall, 1993.
23.
H. L. Van Trees, Optimum Array Processing, New York:Wiley-Interscience, 2002.
24.
P. Leather and D. Parsons, "Antenna diversity for UHF handportable radio", Electron. Lett., vol. 39, no. 13, Jun. 2003.
25.
Y. Huang, A. Nehorai and G. Friedman, "Mutual coupling of two collocated orthogonally orientedcircular thin-wire loops", IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 51, pp. 1307-1314, Jun. 2003.
26.
M. L. Morris and M. A. Jensen, "Impact of supergain in multi-antenna systems", Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Symp., vol. 3B, pp. 430-433, 2005-Jul.
27.
W. L. Stutzman and G. A. Thiele, Antenna Theory and Design, New York:Wiley, pp. 306-374, 1981.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.