Abstract:
A class of physically based models suitable for animating flexible objects in simulated physical environments was proposed earlier by the authors (1987). The original for...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
A class of physically based models suitable for animating flexible objects in simulated physical environments was proposed earlier by the authors (1987). The original formulation works as well in practice for models whose shapes are moderately to highly deformable, but it tends to become numerically ill conditioned as the rigidity of the models is increased. An alternative formulation of deformable models is presented in which deformations are decomposed into a reference component, which may represent an arbitrary shape, and a displacement component, allowing deformation away from this reference shape. The application of the deformable models to a physically based computer animation project is illustrated.<>
Published in: IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications ( Volume: 8, Issue: 6, November 1988)
DOI: 10.1109/38.20317
References is not available for this document.
Select All
1.
D. Terzopoulos, "Elastically Deformable Models", Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 205-214, July 1987.
2.
J. Lassiter, "Principles of Traditional Animation Applied to 3D Computer Animation", Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 35-44, July 1987.
3.
W. W. Armstrong and M. Green, "The Dynamics of Articulated Rigid Bodies for Purposes of Animation", The Visual Computer, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 231-240, 1985.
4.
J. Wilhelms and B. A. Barsky, "Using Dynamic Analysis to Animate Articulated Bodies Such as Humans and Robots", Proc. Graphics Interface 85 Canadian Information Processing Soc., pp. 97-104, 1985.
5.
M. Girard and A. A. Maciejewski, "Computational Modeling for the Computer Animation of Legged Figures", Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 263-270, July 1985.
6.
C. R. Feynman, Modeling the Appearunro of Cloth, 1986.
7.
C. M. Hutfmann and J.E. Hoperoft, "Simiitation of Physical SysΙem from Geometric Models", IEEE J. Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 194-206, June 1987.
8.
P. M. Issacs and M. F. Cohen, "Controlling Dynamic Simulation with Kinematic Constraints Behavior Functions and Inverse Dynamics", Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 215-224, July 1987.
9.
A. Barr, "Topics in Physically-Based Modeling", SIGGRAPH 87 course notes, vol. 17, 1987.
10.
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, London:Pergamon Press, 1959.
11.
H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Mass, Reading:Addison-Wesley, 1980.
12.
R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, London:Interscience, vol. 1, 1953.
13.
D. Terzopoulos, "Regularization of Inverse Visual Problems Involving Discontinuities", IEEE Trans. PAMI, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 413-424, July 1986.
14.
L. Lopidus and C. F. Pinder, Nuerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations in Science and Engineering, New York:John Wiley and Sons, 1982.
15.
O. C. Zienkiewicz, The Finite Element Method, London:McGraw-Hill, 1977.
16.
G. Dahlquist and A. Bjorck, Numerical Methods, N.J., Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall, 1974.
17.
K. Fleischer, Cooking with Kurt, Calif., Palo Alto:Schlumberger Palo Alto Research, 1987.
18.
D. Terzopoulos, "On Matching Deformable Models to Images: Direct and Iterative Solutions", Topical Meeting on Machine Vision Technical Digest Series, vol. 12, pp. 160-167, 1987.
19.
D. Terzopoulos, A. Witkin and M. Kass, "Symmetry-Seeking Models and 3 D Object Reconstruction", Intl J. Computer Vision, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211-221, Oct. 1987.
20.
M. Kass, A. Witkin and D. Terzopoulos, "Snakes: Active Contour Models", IntJ J. Computer Vision, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 321-331, Dec. 1987.
21.
K. Fleischer and A. Witkin, "A Modeling Testbed", Proc. Graphics Interface 88 Canadian Information Processing Soc., pp. 127-137, 1988.
22.
D. Terzopoulos and K. Fleischer, "Modeling Inelastic Deformation: Viscoelasticity Plasticity Fracture", Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH), vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 269-278, Aug. 1988.
