Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Image information and visual quality | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Image information and visual quality


Abstract:

Measurement of visual quality is of fundamental importance to numerous image and video processing applications. The goal of quality assessment (QA) research is to design ...Show More

Abstract:

Measurement of visual quality is of fundamental importance to numerous image and video processing applications. The goal of quality assessment (QA) research is to design algorithms that can automatically assess the quality of images or videos in a perceptually consistent manner. Image QA algorithms generally interpret image quality as fidelity or similarity with a "reference" or "perfect" image in some perceptual space. Such "full-reference" QA methods attempt to achieve consistency in quality prediction by modeling salient physiological and psychovisual features of the human visual system (HVS), or by signal fidelity measures. In this paper, we approach the image QA problem as an information fidelity problem. Specifically, we propose to quantify the loss of image information to the distortion process and explore the relationship between image information and visual quality. QA systems are invariably involved with judging the visual quality of "natural" images and videos that are meant for "human consumption." Researchers have developed sophisticated models to capture the statistics of such natural signals. Using these models, we previously presented an information fidelity criterion for image QA that related image quality with the amount of information shared between a reference and a distorted image. In this paper, we propose an image information measure that quantifies the information that is present in the reference image and how much of this reference information can be extracted from the distorted image. Combining these two quantities, we propose a visual information fidelity measure for image QA. We validate the performance of our algorithm with an extensive subjective study involving 779 images and show that our method outperforms recent state-of-the-art image QA algorithms by a sizeable margin in our simulations. The code and the data from the subjective study are available at the LIVE website.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing ( Volume: 15, Issue: 2, February 2006)
Page(s): 430 - 444
Date of Publication: 16 January 2006

ISSN Information:

PubMed ID: 16479813

I. Introduction

THE field of digital image and video processing deals, in large part, with signals that are meant to convey reproductions of visual information for human consumption, and many image and video processing systems, such as those for acquisition, compression, restoration, enhancement and reproduction, etc., operate solely on these visual reproductions. These systems typically involve tradeoffs between resources and the visual quality of the output. In order to make these tradeoffs we need a way of measuring the quality of images or videos that come from a system running under a given configuration. The obvious way of measuring quality is to solicit the opinion of human observers. However, such subjective evaluations are not only cumbersome and expensive, but they also cannot be incorporated into automatic systems that adjust themselves in real-time based on the feedback of output quality. The goal of quality assessment (QA) research is, therefore, to design algorithms for objective evaluation of quality in a way that is consistent with subjective human evaluation. Such QA methods would prove invaluable for testing, optimizing, bench-marking, and monitoring applications.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.