Prototype of Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery with 6-Axis Force Sensing Capability | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Prototype of Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery with 6-Axis Force Sensing Capability


Abstract:

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) challenges the surgeon’s skills due to his separation from the operation area which can only be reached with long instruments. To overcom...Show More

Abstract:

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) challenges the surgeon’s skills due to his separation from the operation area which can only be reached with long instruments. To overcome these drawbacks, minimally invasive robotic surgery (MIRS) plays an important role. This paper describes the development of actuated and sensorized instruments for minimally invasive robotic surgery which help to increase the surgeon’s immersion and dexterity.
Date of Conference: 18-22 April 2005
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 10 January 2006
Print ISBN:0-7803-8914-X
Print ISSN: 1050-4729
Conference Location: Barcelona, Spain
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Minimally invasive surgery is an operation technique established in the 1980s. The surgeon operates with specially designed surgical tools through a small incision of typically only 1 cm on the patient's skin. The patient benefits from a reduction of surgical trauma to tissues, decreased pain and significantly shorter hospitalization. Cosmetic benefits due to smaller visible scars must also be mentioned. These advantages for the patient however are accompanied by significant disadvantages for the surgeon compared to open surgery. The direct hand-eye coordination present in open surgery is lost [1], as is the direct manual access to the operation site. The long instruments are moved about the fixed point of incision, therefore two degrees of freedom (DoF) are tied and a loss of dexterity inside the patient's body results [2], [3], [4]. The movement is also subject to scaling depending on the depth of insertion. These are significant drawbacks of MIS, which make complex tasks like knot tying very time consuming and require intensive training. As a consequence, MIS did not prevail as desired by patients and surgeons. Only cholecystectomies (gallbladder removals) are performed in 95 % or more cases using minimally invasive procedures.

Select All
1.
M. R. Treat, Computer-Integrated Surgery. MIT Press, 1995, ch. A Surgeons Perspective on the Difficulties of Laparoscopic Surgery, pp. 559-560.
2.
M. Helmy, "A comparative study between laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in men," J Egypt Soc Parasitol, Aug. 2001.
3.
M. Huang, P. Wei, C. Wu, R. Chen, and W. Lee, "Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study," Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech., Oct. 2001.
4.
S. Sauerland, R. Lefering, and E. Neugebauer, "Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis," Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002.
5.
T. Ortmaier, U. Seibold, U. Hagn, D. Boehm, H. Reichenspurner, and G. Hirzinger, "Autonomy and haptic feedback in minimally invasive robotic surgery," Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (ISMICS), Munich - Germany, 2001.
6.
J. M. Sackier and Y. Wang, Computer-Integrated Surgery. MIT Press, 1995, ch. Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: From Concept to Development, pp. 577-580.
7.
T. Ortmaier, Motion Compensation in Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery. VDI Verlag, 2003, phD Thesis.
8.
Y. Nakamura, "Virtual stillness and small size robot system that occupies less space in OR," in International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2003, Workshop Recent Advances in Medical Robotics, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003.
9.
V. Falk, A. Diegeler, T. Walther, N. Löscher, B. Vogel, C. Ulmann, T. Rauch, and F. W. Mohr, "Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart using a computer enhanced telemanipulation system," Heart Surg Forum, vol. 2, pp. 199-205, 1999.
10.
G. Guthart and J. Salisbury, "The intuitive telesurgery system: Overview and application," in Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2000.
11.
D. Salle, P. Bidaud, and G. Morel, "Optimal design of high dexterity modular MIS instrument for coronary artery bypass grafting," in ICRA, 2004.
12.
C. Wagner, N. Stylopoulos, and R. Howe, "The role of force feedback in surgery: Analysis of blunt dissection," in Proc. of the 10th Annual Haptics Symposium, March 2002.
13.
J. Rosen, M. MacFarlane, C. Richards, B. Hannaford, and M. Sinanan, "Surgeon-tool force/torque signatures - evaluation of surgical skills in minimally invasive surgery," in Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, San Francisco, CA, vol. 7, January 1999.
14.
U. Seibold and G. Hirzinger, "A 6-axis force/torque sensor design for haptic feedback in minimally invasive robotic surgery," in MICRO.tec 2003 2nd VDE World Microtechnologies Congress, 2003.
15.
D. Kerr, "Analysis, properties and design of a stewart-platform transducer," Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation Design, vol. 111, no. 25, march 1989.
16.
M. Sorli and S. Pastorelli, "Six-axis reticulated structure force/torque sensor with adaptable performances," Mechatronics, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 585-601, 1995.
17.
B. Kübler, "Entwicklung einer integrierten Antriebseinheit für ein minimal invasives Zangeninstrument in der robotergestützten Chirurgie," Masters thesis, Universität Stuttgart, April 2003.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.