Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A neuro-predictive based self-tuning controller | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

A neuro-predictive based self-tuning controller


Abstract:

A self-tuning controller for a class of processes with predictable dynamics variations using model predictive scheme is presented in this paper. The self-tuning controlle...Show More

Abstract:

A self-tuning controller for a class of processes with predictable dynamics variations using model predictive scheme is presented in this paper. The self-tuning controller design is based on the optimization of a cost function subject to constraints over a finite prediction horizon in time, and, it uses a neural process model. The performance of this new self-tuning controller is substantiated by experiments on a pH control system. Simulation results show how the model predictive scheme is involved in the self-tuning control of nonlinear systems.
Date of Conference: 26-29 June 2005
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 14 November 2005
Print ISBN:0-7803-9137-3

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Budapest, Hungary
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Classical control systems design for complex processes involves complex mathematical analysis and the resulting control architectures have difficulties in controlling highly nonlinear plants. To avoid these difficulties, new approaches based on neural networks for control have been proposed in the last years. The use of neural networks'learning ability makes controller design to be flexible when plant dynamics are complex and highly nonlinear. The use of dynamical neural networks for identification and control was first introduced in [1] and bridging the gap between theory and applications, as well as the relation between neural and adaptive control, have been pointed out in [2]. A systematic classification of neural networks-based control systems can be found in [3] and [4].

Select All
1.
K. S. Narenda and K. Parthasarathy, "Identification and Control of Dynamical Systems using Neural Networks", IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 1, pp. 4-28, 1990.
2.
K. J. Hunt, D. Sbarbaro, R. Zbikowski and P.J. Gawthrop, "Neural Networks for Control Systems- A Survey", Automatica, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1083-1142, 1992.
3.
K.S. Narenda, "Neural Network for control: Theory and applications", Proc. IEEE, vol. 48, pp. 1385, 1996.
4.
M. Agarwal, "A systematic classification ofneural-networks-based control", IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 4, pp. 75-93, 1997.
5.
T. Hagglund and K.J. Astrom, "Industrial Adaptive Controllers Based on Frequency Response Techniques", Automatica, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 599-609, 1991.
6.
K.J. Astrom and B. Wittenmark, "Adaptive Control" in , Addison-Wesley, 1995.
7.
"Neural Networks for Control" in , Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1990.
8.
D. Psaltis, A. Sideris and A.A. Yamamura, "A multilayer neural network controller", IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 8, pp. 17-21, 1988.
9.
M. Miranjan and F. Fallside, "Neural Networks and Radial Basis functions for Classifying Static Speech Pattern", Computer Speech Language, vol. 4, pp. 275-289, 1990.
10.
T. Poggio and F. Girosi, "Networks for Approximation and Learnigand", Proc. IEEE, vol. 78, pp. 1481-1497, 1990.
11.
"Algorithms for Approximation- Radial Basis Function for Multivariable Interpolation: A Review" in , Oxford, U.K.:Oxford University Press, pp. 143-167, 1987.
12.
S. Chen, S.A. Billings and P.M. Grant, "Nonlinear system identification using neural networks", Int. J. Control, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1013-1032, 1990.
13.
E.F. Camacho and C. Bordons, "Model Predictive Control" in , London:Springer-Verlag, 1999.
14.
V.R. Radhakrishnan and S. W. Wah, "Wiener Type Model for pH Neutralization Process", Proceedings of RSCE2002 and 16th SOMChE, 2002.
15.
I.D. Landau, "System Identification and Control Design" in , Prentice Hall, 1990.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.