Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Soil image segmentation and texture analysis: a computer vision approach | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Soil image segmentation and texture analysis: a computer vision approach


Abstract:

Automated processing of digitized soilsection images reveals elements of soil structure and draws primary estimates of bioecological importance, like ground fertility and...Show More

Abstract:

Automated processing of digitized soilsection images reveals elements of soil structure and draws primary estimates of bioecological importance, like ground fertility and changes in terrestrial ecosystems. We examine a sophisticated integration of some modern methods from computer vision for image feature extraction, texture analysis, and segmentation into homogeneous regions, relevant to soil micromorphology. First, we propose the use of a morphological partial differential equation-based segmentation scheme based on seeded region-growing and level curve evolution with speed depending on image contrast. Second, we analyze surface texture information by modeling image variations as local modulation components and using multifrequency filtering and instantaneous nonlinear energy-tracking operators to estimate spatial modulation energy. By separately exploiting contrast and texture information, through multiscale image smoothing, we propose a joint image segmentation method for further interpretation of soil images and feature measurements. Our experimental results in images digitized under different specifications and scales demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed computational methods for soil structure analysis. We also briefly demonstrate their applicability to remote sensing images.
Published in: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters ( Volume: 2, Issue: 4, October 2005)
Page(s): 394 - 398
Date of Publication: 24 October 2005

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Image data in geosciences are common and require processing and measurement schemes that range from small microscopic scales to large remote sensing scales. In this work, we focus mainly to the first category and specifically in images of thin soilsections. The goal of soil micromorphology, as a branch of soil science, is the description, interpretation, and measurement of components, features, and fabrics in soils at a microscopic level. Basic soil components are the individual particles (e.g., quartz grains, clay minerals, plant fragments) that can be resolved with the optical microscope together with the fine material that is unresolved into discrete individuals. Soil structure is concerned with the size, shape, sharpness, contrast, frequency, and spatial arrangement of primary particles and voids. Many of these characteristics are a function of the orientation of components and the direction in which they are cut as well as of the magnification used. Soilsection images produced via a digitizing procedure, using conventional scanners, cameras, or microscopes under polarized light, exhibit a great variety of geometric features. Important image features that provide useful information for soil structure quality evaluation include cluster/particle shape, either one-dimensional (1-D), such as edges or curves, or two-dimensional (2-D), such as light or dark blobs (small homogeneous regions of random shape), spatial arrangement of soil components, and their texture.

Select All
1.
R. Protz, M. Shipitalo, A. Mermut and C. Fox, "Image-analysis of soils-present and future", Geoderma, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 115-125, Sep. 1987.
2.
P. M. C. Bruneau, D. A. Davidson and I. C. Grieve, "An evaluation of image analysis for measuring changes in void space and excremental features on soil thin sections in an upland grassland soil", Geoderma, vol. 120, no. 3-4, pp. 165-175, Jun. 2004.
3.
P. Maragos, "Image analysis of soil micromorphology: Feature extraction segmentation and quality inference", J. Appl. Signal Process., vol. 6, pp. 902-912, Jun. 2004.
4.
"The morphological approach to segmentation: The watershed transformation" in Mathematical Morphology in Image Processing, New York:Marcel Dekker, 1993.
5.
L. Vincent and P. Soille, "Watershed in digital spaces: An efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations", IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 583-598, Jun. 1991.
6.
L. Najman and M. Schmitt, "Watershed of a continuous function", Signal Process., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 99-112, Jun. 1994.
7.
F. Meyer and P. Maragos, "Multiscale morphological segmentations based on watershed flooding and eikonal PDE", Proc. Scale-Space99 Conf., pp. 351-362, 1999.
8.
P. Maragos and M. A. Butt, "Curve evolution differential morphology and distance transforms applied to multiscale and eikonal problems", Fundamenta Inf., vol. 41, pp. 91-129, Jun. 2000.
9.
S. Osher and J. Sethian, "Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on HamiltonJacobi formulations", J. Comput. Phys., vol. 79, pp. 12-49, 1988.
10.
A. Sofou and P. Maragos, "PDE-based modeling of image segmentation using volumic flooding", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. II-431-II-434, 2003.
11.
J. A. Sethian, Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods, U.K., Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999.
12.
A. C. Bovik, N. Gopal, T. Emmoth and A. Restrepo, "Localized measurement of emergent image frequencies by Gabor wavelets", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 691-712, Mar. 1992.
13.
J. P. Havlicek, D. S. Harding and A. C. Bovik, "Multidimensional quasi-eigenfunction approximations and multicomponent AM-FM models", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 227-242, Feb. 2000.
14.
P. Maragos and A. C. Bovik, "Image demodulation using multidimensional energy separation", J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1867-1876, Sep. 1995.
15.
I. Kokkinos, G. Evangelopoulos and P. Maragos, "Modulation-feature based textured image segmentation using curve evolution", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 1201-1204, 2004.
16.
L. A. Vese and S. J. Osher, "Modeling textures with total variation minimization and oscillating patterns in image processing", J. Sci. Comput., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 553-572, Dec. 2003.
17.
F. Meyer and P. Maragos, "Nonlinear scale-space representation with morphological levelings", J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., vol. 11, pp. 245-265, 2000.
18.
S. E. Grigorescu, N. Petkov and P. Kruizinga, "Comparison of texture features based on Gabor filters", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1160-1167, Oct. 2002.
19.
M. Shi and G. Healey, "Hyperspectral texture recognition using a multiscale opponent representation", IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1090-1095, May 2003.
20.
J. Liu and Y. Yang, "Multiresolution color image segmentation", IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 689-700, Jul. 1994.
21.
D. Mumford and J. Shah, "Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems", Commun. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 577-685, 1988.
22.
S. H. Kwok and A. G. Constantinides, "A fast recursive shortest spanning tree for image segmentation and edge detection", IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 328-332, Feb. 1997.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.