Loading web-font TeX/Main/Regular
Quantification of airspace sector capacity using decentralized conflict resolution procedures | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Quantification of airspace sector capacity using decentralized conflict resolution procedures


Abstract:

This article quantifies the maximum capacity of fixed-altitude airspace sectors and develops conflict resolution algorithms to achieve this capacity using constant-speed ...Show More

Abstract:

This article quantifies the maximum capacity of fixed-altitude airspace sectors and develops conflict resolution algorithms to achieve this capacity using constant-speed heading-change maneuvers. The proposed conflict resolution algorithms are decentralized and can be used for sectors with multiple intersections. We show that the acceptable output-flow-rate determines the capacity of the sector; automation procedures (for conflict resolution) can be designed to achieve this sector capacity.
Date of Conference: 14-17 December 2004
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 16 May 2005
Print ISBN:0-7803-8682-5
Print ISSN: 0191-2216
Conference Location: Nassau, Bahamas
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

This work aims to quantify the maximum capacity of a sector (in the National Airspace System, NAS) and to develop an automation procedure that achieves the maximum sector capacity. It is noted that sector capacity is used for planning and execution of Air Traffic Management (ATM). For example, capacity is used for flow planning at the national and regional level to avoid overloads and to reduce wasted resource [1]. The sector capacity is also used, along with demand forecasting methods, to optimize Air Traffic Control (ATC) and Airline Operations Center decisions [2]. While the acceptable input-flow-rate of a single aircraft route can be quantified based on minimum separation requirements [3], it is difficult to quantify the acceptable input-flow-rates for multiple intersecting routes because the conflict resolution procedures used at the intersections generates interference between aircraft flows in the different routes. However, a conservative upper bound on the acceptable, total input-flow-rates into a sector can be established by using the maximum, acceptable output-flow-rate of the sector. This upper bound on the total input-flow-rates guarantees that aircraft and delays do not accumulate in the sector. In particular, to avoid accumulation, the sum of all the input-flow-rates of all routes which exit the sector at a particular output (see Figure 1) should not exceed the acceptable output-flow-rate , i.e., satisfies the {Accumulation \ Constraint}: \sum\limits_{i,k=j}\lambda(R_{i,k})\leq\bar{\lambda}(O_{j}).\eqno{\hbox{(1)}}

Select All
1.
A. Haraldsdottir, R. W. Schwab, and M. S. Alcabin, "Air traffic management capacity-driven operational concept through 2015," 2nd International Air Traffic Management R seminar ATM-98, Orlando, December 1998.
2.
B. Sridhar, G. B. Chatterji, S. Grabbe, and K. Sheth, "Integration of traffic flow management decisions," pp. 2265-2273, 2002, aIAA Paper No. 2002-5014.
3.
W. Siddiqee, "Air route capacity models," Navigation, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 296-300, 1974.
4.
B. Arad Atid, "The control load and sector design," The Controller, vol. 1-4, pp. 20-27, 1972.
5.
D. Schmidt, "On modelling ate workload and sector capacity," J. of Aircraft, vol. 13, no. 7, Jul 1976.
6.
V. Hopkin, "The measurement of the air traffic controller," Human Factors, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 547-560, Oct 1980.
7.
G. Chatterji and B. Sridhar, "Neural network based air traffic controller workload prediction," Proc. of the American Control Conf., pp. 2620-2624, 1999.
8.
P. Wong, G. Couluris, and D. Schmidt, "Aggregate flow model for evaluating ate planning strategies," J. of Aircraft, vol. 14, no. 6, Jun 1977.
9.
N. Tofukuji, "An enroule ate simulation experimant for sector capacity estimation," IEEE Trans. Control System Technology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 138-143, 1993.
10.
M. Janić, "A model of air traffic control sector capacity based on air traffic controller workload," Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 311-335, 1997.
11.
B. Sridhar, G. Chatterji, and S. Grabbe, "Benefits of dkect-to-tool in national airspace system," IEEE Trans. Intel. Trans. Sys., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 190-198, 2000.
12.
H. Erzberger and W. Nedell, "Design of automated system for management of arrival traffic," NASA Technical Memorandum 102201, June, 1989.
13.
J. Kuchar and L. Yang, "Survey of conflict detection and resolution modeling method," Proc. of the AIAA Guid., Nov., and Cont. Conf., pp. 1388-1397, 1997.
14.
C. Tomlin, G. Pappas, and S. Sastry, "Conflict resolution for air traffic management: A study in multi-agent hybrid systems," IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, vol. 43, no. 4, 1998.
15.
P. Menon, G. Sweriduk, and B. Sridhar, "Optimal strategies for free-flight air traffic conflict resolution," J. of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 203-211, 1999.
16.
K. Bilimoria, "A geometric optimization approach to aircraft conflict resolution," 2000, aIAA Paper No. 2000-4265.
17.
S. Devasia and G. Meyer, "Automated conflict resolution procedures for air traffic management," Proceedings of the CDC, vol. 3, pp. 2456-2462, December 1999.
18.
D. Dugail, E. Feron, and K. Bilimoia, "Conflict-free conformance to en route flow rate constraints," Proc. of the AIAA Guid., Nav., and Cont. Conf., pp. 20-27, 2002.
19.
A. Bayen, P. Grieder, H. Sipma, G. Meyer, and C. Tomlin, "Delay predictive models of the national airspace system using hybrid control theory," Proc. of the AIAA Guid., Nov., and Cont. Conf., pp. 767-772, 2002.
20.
A. Hudgell and R. Gingell, "Integra metrics methodologies detailed specification of capacity metric inputs - processing - outputs," EUROCONTROL, 2000.
21.
D. Dugail, Z.-H. Mao, and E. Feron, "Stability of intersecting aircraft flows under centralized and decentralized conflict avoidance rules," 2001, aIAA Paper No. 2001-4296.
22.
T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, ser. Wiley Series in Telecommunications. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 1991.
23.
W. Niedringhaus, "Stream option manager: Automated integration of aircraft separation, merging, stream mangement, and other air traffic control functions," IEEE Trans Sys., Man, and Cyber., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1269-1280, 1995.
24.
Z.-H. Mao, E. Feron, and K. Bilimoria, "Stability of intersecting aircraft flows under decentralized conflict avoidance rules," 2000, aIAA Paper No. 2000-4271.
25.
S. Devasia, M. Heymann, and G. Meyer, "Automation procedures for air traffic management: A token-based approach," Proc. of the American Control Conf., pp. 736-741, 2002.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.