Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Segmentation of prostate boundaries from ultrasound images using statistical shape model | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Segmentation of prostate boundaries from ultrasound images using statistical shape model


Abstract:

Presents a statistical shape model for the automatic prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound images. A Gabor filter bank is first used to characterize the prostat...Show More

Abstract:

Presents a statistical shape model for the automatic prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound images. A Gabor filter bank is first used to characterize the prostate boundaries in ultrasound images in both multiple scales and multiple orientations. The Gabor features are further reconstructed to be invariant to the rotation of the ultrasound probe and incorporated in the prostate model as image attributes for guiding the deformable segmentation. A hierarchical deformation strategy is then employed, in which the model adaptively focuses on the similarity of different Gabor features at different deformation stages using a multiresolution technique, i.e., coarse features first and fine features later. A number of successful experiments validate the algorithm.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging ( Volume: 22, Issue: 4, April 2003)
Page(s): 539 - 551
Date of Publication: 30 April 2003

ISSN Information:

PubMed ID: 12774900
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Prostate cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in American men. The American Cancer Society predicted that in 2002, 189 000 men would be diagnosed with prostate cancer and about 30 200 would die [1]. When prostate cancer is diagnosed in its early stages, it is usually curable; and the treatment is often effective even in its later stages. Therefore, the decision of when, how, and on whom to apply a diagnostic procedure is very important [2].

Select All
1.
Amer. Cancer Soc., 2002, [online] Available: http://www.www.cancer.org.
2.
C. Mettlin, "American society national cancer detection project", Cancer, vol. 75, pp. 1790-1794, 1995.
3.
K. K. Hodge, J. E. McNeal, M. K. Terris and T. A. Stamey, "Random-systematic versus directed ultrasound-guided core-biopsies of the prostate", J. Urol., vol. 142, pp. 71-75, 1989.
4.
P. D. Grimm, J. C. Balsko and H. Ragde, "Ultrasound guided transperineal implantation of iodine 125 and palladium 103 for the treatment of early stage prostate cancer", Atlas Urol. Clin. North Amer., vol. 2, pp. 113-125, 1994.
5.
C. R. Hill and G. R. ter Haar, "High intensity focused ultrasound potential for cancer treatment", Brit. J. Radiol., vol. 68, pp. 1296-1303, 1995.
6.
M. K. Terris and T. A. Stamey, "Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound", J. Urol., vol. 145, pp. 984-987, 1991.
7.
C. Knoll, M. Alcaniz, V. Grau, C. Monserrat and M. C. Juan, "Outlining of the prostate using snakes with shape restrictions based on the wavelet transform", Pattern Recognit., vol. 32, pp. 1767-1781, 1999.
8.
A. Ghanei, H. Soltanian-Zadeh, A. Ratkesicz and F. Yin, "A three-dimensional deformable model for segmentation of human prostate from ultrasound image", Med. Phys., vol. 28, pp. 2147-2153, 2001.
9.
R. Rao and J. Ben-Arie, "Optimal edge detection using expansion matching and restoration", IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. 16, pp. 1169-1182, Dec. 1994.
10.
S. D. Pathak, V. Chalana, D. R. Haynor and Y. Kim, "Edge-guided boundary delineation in prostate ultrasound images", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 19, pp. 1211-1219, Dec. 2000.
11.
T. Cootes, A. Hill, C. Taylor and J. Haslam, "The use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images", Image Vis. Comput., vol. 12, pp. 355-366, 1994.
12.
T. Cootes, D. Cooper, C. Taylor and J. Graham, "Active shape models—their training and application", Comput. Vis. Image Understand., vol. 61, pp. 38-59, 1995.
13.
N. Duta and M. Sonka, "Segmentation and interpretation of MR brain images: an improved active shape model", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 17, pp. 1049-1062, Dec. 1998.
14.
D. Shen, E. H. Herskovits and C. Davatzikos, "An adaptive-focus statistical shape model for segmentation and shape modeling of 3D brain structures", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 20, pp. 257-270, Apr. 2001.
15.
D. Shen and C. Davatzikos, "An adaptive-focus deformable model using statistical and geometric information", IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. 22, pp. 906-913, Aug. 2000.
16.
B. S. Manjunath and W. Y. Ma, "Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data", IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. 18, pp. 837-842, Aug. 1996.
17.
D. Shen and C. Davatzikos, "HAMMER: Hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration", IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., pp. 1421-1439, Nov. 2002.
18.
A. Fenster and D. Downey, "Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging", SPIE: Med. Phys., vol. 3659, pp. 2-11, 1999.
19.
D. Shen and C. Davatzikos, "Very high resolution morphometry using mass-preserving deformations and HAMMER elastic registration", NeuroImage, vol. 18, pp. 28-41, Jan. 2003.
20.
T. F. Cootes, G. J. Edwards and C. J. Taylor, "Active appearance models", Proc. 5th Eur. Conf. Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 484-489, 1998.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.