The effects of time and personality on the productivity of management information systems | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

The effects of time and personality on the productivity of management information systems


Abstract:

The paper studies the relationship between information technology (IT), time personality and managerial productivity. Time personality is captured by concepts of polychro...Show More

Abstract:

The paper studies the relationship between information technology (IT), time personality and managerial productivity. Time personality is captured by concepts of polychronicity and monochronicity. They reflect an individual's preference for being engaged in either many (polychronicity) or one (monochronicity) activity at a time block. The concepts of time personality, poly/monochronicity are represented by a set of the temporal dimensions. In this paper, we present a descriptive study in a form of survey, in which the temporal dimensions serve as mediators between IT and productivity. By conducting this study we aim to find evidence for the existence of a link between IT, poly/monochronicity and the productivity of managerial work. Analysis of the data shows the positive nature of the relationships between IT and productivity within the frames of the research design. Managers reported that IT influences productivity positively by altering the temporal dimensions. We also found differences between the impact of IT on the productivity of senior and middle managers. While the work of middle managers is greatly influenced by organizational processes, the work of senior managers is influenced by such a factor as their personality. Personal preferences are often ignored in current practice of IS development - a fact that weakens the positive impact of IT on the productivity of managers. In our paper, we propose an approach to the development of IS that takes into account a manager's time personality. The approach is based on an understanding and modeling of managerial activities and an elicitation of requirements imposed by different time personalities on the management information systems.
Date of Conference: 06-09 January 2003
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 06 February 2003
Print ISBN:0-7695-1874-5
Conference Location: Big Island, HI, USA
References is not available for this document.

1. Introduction

The rapid introduction of IT in the business environment has raised the question of its impact on managerial productivity. The understanding of the concept of productivity differs depending on the knowledge domain: it varies from quantitative measures expressed in monetary units aggregated on a national and organizational level ([2], [22] and [5]) to subjective judgments expressed on an individual and group level [33]. We base our analysis on the subjective judgments of managerial productivity since considering productivity only from an investment perspective brings a good understanding of economic trends, but relatively few insights into how IT affects the nature of managerial work.

Select All
1.
S. R. Barley, "On technology time and social order: technically induced change in the temporal organization of radiological work" in Making time: ethnographies of high technology organizations, Philadelphia:Temple University Press, 1988.
2.
A. Barua, C.H. Kriebel and T. Mukhopadhyay, "Information Technologies and Business Value: an Analytic and Empirical Investigation", Information Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3-23, March 1995.
3.
A.C. Bluedorn, T. Kalliath, M. Strube and G. Martin, "Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV)" in Journal of Managerial Psychology, MCB University Press, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 205-230, 1999.
4.
C. Benabou, "Polychronicity and temporal dimensions of work in learning organizations" in Journal of Managerial Psychology, MCB University Press, vol. 14, no. 3/4, pp. 257-268, 1999.
5.
E. Brynjolfsson, "The productivity paradox of information technology", Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 66-77, December 1993.
6.
D. Byrne and D. Nelson, "Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 4, pp. 240-243, 1965.
7.
J. Cotté and S. Rathneshwar, "Juggling and hopping: what does it mean to work polychronically ?" in Journal of Managerial Psychology, MCB University Press, vol. 14, no. 3/4, pp. 184-204, 1999.
8.
C. Fisher, "The impact of perceived environmental uncertainty and individual differences on management information requirements: a research note", Accounting Organization and Society, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 361-369, 1996.
9.
J. Francis-Smythe and I. Robertson, "Time-related Individual differences" in Time Society, SAGE, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 273-292, 1999.
10.
H. Goldstein, "Multilevel statistical methods" in , London:John Wiley Sons, 1995.
11.
R. L. Gorsuch, "Factor Analysis" in , Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.
12.
E.T. Hall, The Hidden Dimension Doubleday, New York, 1976.
13.
G. H Hofstede, "Cultural consequences: International differences in work-related values." in , Beverly Hills:Sage publications, 1980.
14.
G.P. Huber, "Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs", Management Science, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 567-580, May 1983.
15.
C.G. Jung and H.G. trans. Baynes, "Psychological Types" in , Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 1971.
16.
M Kakihara and C. Sørensen, "Mobility: an Extended Perspective", Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences.
17.
C. Kaufman, P. Lane and J. Lindquist, "Exploring more than 24 hours a day: a preliminary investigation of polychronic time use", Journal of consumer research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 392-401, 1991.
18.
C. Kaufman-Scarborough and J.D. Lindquist, "Time management and polychronicity Comparisons contrasts and insights for the workplace" in Journal of Managerial Psychology, MCB University Press, vol. 14, no. 3/4, pp. 288-312, 1999.
19.
J. Kotter, "What Effective General Managers Really Do", Harvard Business Review, pp. 156-167, November-December 1982.
20.
L. B. Kurke and H. E. Aldrich, "Mintzberg Was Right: a Replication and Extension of the Nature of Managerial Work", Management Science, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 975-984, 1983.
21.
H. Lee and J. Liebenau, "Temporal Effects of Information Systems on business processes.: Focusing on the dimension of temporality", Accounting Management Information Technologies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 157-185, 2000.
22.
M.A. Mahmood and G.J. Mann, "Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: an Exploratory Study", Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 97-122, 1993.
23.
H. Mintzberg, "The Nature of Managerial Work" in , New York:Harper Row, 1973.
24.
H. Mintzberg, "Managerial work: Forty years later" in Executive Behaviour, Uppsala, 1991.
25.
H. Mintzberg, "The Rise and Fall of Strategic planning" in , Prentice Hall International (UK) Limited, pp. 264-266, 1994.
26.
I.B. Myers, "Introduction to Type" in , Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychology Press, 1980.
27.
C. Nass, Y. Moon, B.J Fogg, B. Reeves and C. Dryer, "Can Computer Personalities be Human Personalities?", proc. of ACM CHI95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, vol. 2, pp. 228-229, 1995.
28.
A. Pinsonneault and S. Rivard, "Information Technology and the Nature of Managerial Work", MIS Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 287, 1998.
29.
D. Robey, "Cognitive Style and DSS design: a comment on Hubers paper", Management Science, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 580-583, May 1983.
30.
A.E Schultz, "Temperaments and learning styles in industrial education students a correlation study", 1985.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.