User Preference-Aware and Efficient Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Parking with Hybrid A* and Nonlinear Optimization | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

User Preference-Aware and Efficient Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Parking with Hybrid A* and Nonlinear Optimization


Abstract:

Trajectory planning can be formulated as a nonlinear optimization problem that needs a proper initial guess as a warm-start to accelerate convergences. Current studies of...Show More

Abstract:

Trajectory planning can be formulated as a nonlinear optimization problem that needs a proper initial guess as a warm-start to accelerate convergences. Current studies often ignore the users' preferences on safety and thus the distance to obstacles may either be too close or too far. Also, unnecessary gear shifting points can be caused by the local optimal but unreasonable Reeds-Shepp curve connection in the hybrid A*, degrading the user's acceptance. The existing works also suffer from high computation costs and low success rates, limiting their practical use. To tackle this, we propose an efficient user preference-aware trajectory planning framework for autonomous parking. A segmented hybrid A* is built to provide the initial guess for the nonlinear trajectory optimization. Specifically, we use A * to choose a user-preferred path considering safety and travel efficiency preferences. Then, we set guide points along the selected A * path and connect the guide points using the segmented hybrid A * to generate the coarse trajectory. In addition, safety-adaptive driving corridors are efficiently constructed considering the user's safety awareness with varying step sizes. Moreover, a local search strategy and a local optimization model are designed to optimize the unnecessary gear-shifting points. Simulation experiments demonstrate the superiority of our method in complex cases regarding safety and driving comfort. Our approach also outperforms the baseline approaches regarding the computation time and success rate.
Date of Conference: 24-27 September 2024
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 20 March 2025
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Automated parking technologies contribute to obtaining a trajectory quickly that can avoid collision with surrounding obstacles, which should be comfortable for passengers. However, compared with structured scenarios, trajectory planning in an unstructured environment is more challenging [1]–[5]. Based on this, this paper focuses on the problem of autonomous parking trajectory planning in narrow spaces with dense irregular obstacles. Currently, the existing parking trajectory planner for unstructured environments includes search-and-sample-based methods and optimal-based methods. The search-and-sample-based method converts state space or control space into a connected graph with nodes and edges and then uses a graph search algorithm to find a feasible path from the start point to the goal point. The sampling techniques in the state space include the state lattice approach, rapidly exploring random trees (RRT) and its variants [6], [7]. Meanwhile, the typical control-space samplers include the dynamic windows approach and the hybrid A * algorithm. However, hybrid A * [8] is not a complete search algorithm, and it may have a high computational cost or even fail to find a suitable initial guess. The optimal-based method describes the parking trajectory task as an optimal control problem (OCP) and discretizes it into a nonlinear programming problem (NLP) [9], [10], which can be solved by using numerical methods [11]–[13].

Overview of this framework. An initial guess is obtained through the segmented hybrid A * and the alleviation of unnecessary shifting points, which is used for the warm start of the nonlinear optimization problem. We design a safety-adaptive driving corridor method with a varying size approach, which can adjust safety levels and enhance efficiency in constructing the safety constraints. A local optimization model is also formulated to further optimize the unnecessary gear-shifting points.

Select All
1.
Y. Guo, Z. Guo, Y. Wang, D. Yao, B. Li and L. Li, "A survey of trajectory planning methods for autonomous driving - part i: Unstructured scenarios", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, pp. 1-29, 2023.
2.
D. González, J. Pérez, V. Milanés and F. Nashashibi, "A review of motion planning techniques for automated vehicles", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1135-1145, 2016.
3.
C. Jang, C. Kim, S. Lee, S. Kim, S. Lee and M. Sunwoo, "Replannable automated parking system with a standalone around view monitor for narrow parking lots", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 777-790, 2020.
4.
J. Lian, W. Ren, D. Yang, L. Li and F. Yu, "Trajectory planning for autonomous valet parking in narrow environments with enhanced hybrid a * search and nonlinear optimization", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 3723-3734, 2023.
5.
Y. Guo, D. Yao, B. Li, Z. He, H. Gao and L. Li, "Trajectory planning for an autonomous vehicle in spatially constrained environments", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 18326-18336, 2022.
6.
J. Wang, T. Li, B. Li and M. Q.-H. Meng, "Gmr-rrt*: Sampling-based path planning using gaussian mixture regression", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 690-700, 2022.
7.
J. Wang, W. Chi, C. Li, C. Wang and M. Q.-H. Meng, "Neural rrt*: Learning-based optimal path planning", IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1748-1758, 2020.
8.
D. Dolgov, S. Thrun, M. Montemerlo and J. Diebel, "Path planning for autonomous vehicles in unknown semi -structured environments", The international journal of robotics research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 485-501, 2010.
9.
B. Li and Z. Shao, "Simultaneous dynamic optimization: A trajectory planning method for nonholonomic car-like robots", Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 87, pp. 30-42, 2015.
10.
K. Bergman and D. Axehill, "Combining homotopy methods and numerical optimal control to solve motion planning problems", 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 347-354, 2018.
11.
P. Zips, M. Böck and A. Kugi, "Optimisation based path planning for car parking in narrow environments", Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 79, pp. 1-11, 2016.
12.
B. Li, K. Wang and Z. Shao, "Time-optimal maneuver planning in automatic parallel parking using a simultaneous dynamic optimization approach", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3263-3274, 2016.
13.
R. Chai, A. Tsourdos, A. Savvaris, S. Chai and Y. Xia, "Two-stage trajectory optimization for autonomous ground vehicles parking maneuver", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 3899-3909, 2019.
14.
C. Chen, M. Rickert and A. Knoll, "Path planning with orientation-aware space exploration guided heuristic search for autonomous parking and maneuvering", 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1148-1153, 2015.
15.
B. Li, T. Acarman, X. Peng, Y. Zhang, X. Bian and Q. Kong, "Maneuver planning for automatic parking with safe travel corridors: A numerical optimal control approach", 2020 European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 1993-1998, 2020.
16.
B. Li, T. Acarman, Y. Zhang, Y. Ouyang, C. Yaman, Q. Kong, et al., "Optimization-based trajectory planning for autonomous parking with irregularly placed obstacles: A lightweight iterative framework", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 11970-11981, 2022.
17.
Z. Han, Y. Wu, T. Li, L. Zhang, L. Pei, L. Xu, et al., "An efficient spatial-temporal trajectory planner for autonomous vehicles in unstructured environments", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1797-1814, 2024.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.