Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
MSD-Net: A Multi-Scale Semantic Segmentation Method for Images with Metal Artifact Interference | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

MSD-Net: A Multi-Scale Semantic Segmentation Method for Images with Metal Artifact Interference


Abstract:

The semantic segmentation for computed tomography (CT) images is an important step in clinical diagnosis. Metal artifacts may cause significant segmentation errors, and e...Show More

Abstract:

The semantic segmentation for computed tomography (CT) images is an important step in clinical diagnosis. Metal artifacts may cause significant segmentation errors, and even after artifact reduction, conventional methods still struggle to achieve accurate segmentation results. To address the reduction in segmentation accuracy caused by artifact interference, this paper proposed a Multi-Scale Detail Enhanced Network (MSD-Net). The network employed a Channel Multi-Scale module and a Mamba module to extract multi-scale information and selectively capture input information, establishing clear relationships between global and local features. When processing blurred edge information, the proposed multi-scale detail enhancement structure enhanced the extracted multi-scale detail information, and used a multi-scale feature fusion method to extract semantic information at more appropriate scales. High-precision segmentation results were achieved on images following metal artifact reduction.
Date of Conference: 26-28 October 2024
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 07 March 2025
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Shanghai, China
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Computed tomography (CT) has become an indispensable diagnostic tool in recent years[1]. Accurate organ segmentation in CT images provides important support for disease diagnosis and quantitative analysis, surgical planning and navigation, monitoring of treatment effects, and various other clinical tasks. [2]. Semantic segmentation methods for CT images without metal implants have already achieved outstanding results. However, when metal artifacts are present in CT images, these artifacts can significantly degrade image quality, leading to numerous errors in the segmentation results. This issue is particularly challenging when metal implants of varying shapes and sizes are present in the body. Even after artifact reduction, CT images still contain metal implants and incomplete tissue structure edges. Conventional segmentation methods struggle to recognize the relevant features of metal and incomplete tissue structure edges in the images, leading to the misclassification of metal as tissue and the inability to effectively identify incomplete edges. Therefore, developing a segmentation method for CT images with reduced metal artifacts is an important research direction.

Select All
1.
D T Ginat and R. Gupta, "Advances in computed tomography imaging technology[J]", Annual review of biomedical engineering, vol. 16, pp. 431-453, 2014.
2.
M Casati, S Piffer, S Calusi et al., Clinical validation of an automatic atlas - based segmentation tool for male pelvis CT images[J]. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. e13507, 2022.
3.
Liu Pengbo et al., Deep learning to segment pelvic bones: large-scale CT datasets and baseline models[J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 16, pp. 749-756, 2021.
4.
Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N et al., "Attention is all you need[J]", Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 30, 2017.
5.
A. Gu and T. Dao, Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces, vol. 00752, 2023.
6.
L C Chen, Y Zhu, G Papandreou et al., Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation[C] Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 801-818, 2018.
7.
Li Yanghao et al., "Scale-aware trident networks for object detection", Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019.
8.
Y Ma, H Xu, Y Feng et al., "MSDEnet: Multi-scale detail enhanced network based on human visual system for medical image segmentation[J]", Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 170, pp. 108010, 2024.
9.
Z. Zhou, Y. Zhou, D. Wang, J. Mu, & Zhou and H. Self-attention, feature fusion network for semantic segmentation. Neurocomputing, pp. 50-59, 2021.
10.
A Paszke, A Chaurasia, S Kim et al., "Enet: A deep neural network architecture for real-time semantic segmentation[J]", arXiv preprint, 2016.
11.
Z. Xing, T. Ye, Y. Yang, G. Liu and L. Zhu, Segmamba: Long-range sequentialmodeling mamba for 3d medical image segmentation, vol. 13560, 2024.
12.
L. Zhu, B. Liao, Q. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Liu and X. Wang, Vision mamba: Efficientvisual representation learning with bidirectional state space model, vol. 09417, 2024.
13.
X. Ding, X. Zhang, J. Han and G. Ding, "Scaling up your kernels to 31x31: Revisiting large kernel design in cnns", Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 11963-11975, 2022.
14.
X. Ding, Y. Guo, G. Ding and J. Han, "Acnet: Strengthening the kernel skeletons for powerful cnn via asymmetric convolution blocks", Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp. 1911-1920, 2019.
15.
J Mukhoti, V Kulharia, A Sanyal et al., "Calibrating deep neural networks using focal loss[C]", Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Virtual: MIT Press., vol. 33, pp. 15288-15299, 2020.
16.
R Zhao, B Qian, X Zhang et al., "Rethinking dice loss for medical image segmentation[C]", 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 851-860, 2020.
17.
Z Xiao, B Liu, L Geng et al., "Segmentation of lung nodules using improved 3D-U Net neural network[J]", Symmetry, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1787, 2020.
18.
J Chen, Y Lu, Q Yu et al., "Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation[J]", arXiv preprint, 2021.
19.
C Zhao, W Lv, X Zhang et al., "MMS- Net: Multi-level multi-scale feature extraction network for medical image segmentation[J]", Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 86, pp. 105330, 2023.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.