Traffic Control via Fleets of Connected and Automated Vehicles | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Traffic Control via Fleets of Connected and Automated Vehicles


Abstract:

In this paper, we propose three control strategies, based on different levels of cooperation (centralized, decentralized and quasi-decentralized), to improve density depe...Show More

Abstract:

In this paper, we propose three control strategies, based on different levels of cooperation (centralized, decentralized and quasi-decentralized), to improve density dependent traffic performance indexes, such as fuel consumption, by acting on a small number of Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) operating as moving bottlenecks on the surrounding flow. We rely on a multi-scale approach to model mixed traffic of CAVs in the bulk flow. In particular, CAVs are individually tracked and they are allowed to overtake (if on distinct lanes) or queuing (if on the same lane). Controlling CAVs desired speeds allows to act on the system to minimize the selected cost function. For the proposed control strategies, we apply both global optimization and a Model Predictive Control approach. In particular, we perform numerical tests to investigate how the CAVs number and positions impact the result, showing that few, optimally chosen vehicles are sufficient to significantly improve the selected performance indexes, even using a decentralized control policy. Simulation results support the attractive perspective of exploiting a very small number of vehicles as endogenous control actuators to regulate traffic flow on road networks, providing a flexible alternative to traditional control methods.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems ( Volume: 26, Issue: 2, February 2025)
Page(s): 1573 - 1582
Date of Publication: 09 December 2024

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The recent technological advances in connectivity and automation for the automotive industry are transforming the transportation sector and impacting the related socio-economical aspects. In particular, Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs), which are expected to dominate the vehicle market in the next future, have raised the interest of researchers for their potential impact on traffic flow, with the aim of improving traffic conditions and safety. Several studies have shown that CAVs can be employed to control the overall traffic to mitigate congestion and improve throughput, with a consequent reduction of pollutant emissions. This has been proved by model based theoretical results [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], machine learning approaches [11], [12] and real world experiments [13]. All these investigations show that even a small number of automated vehicles among human-driven vehicles can bring benefits to the whole system, by dissipating stop-and-go waves, improving the throughput and reducing traffic flow emissions and consumption. In this perspective, CAV control can offer a valid, flexible and cheap alternative to more traditional traffic management strategies, such as ramp metering and variable speed limits [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], which require specific infrastructures.

Select All
1.
A. Talebpour and H. S. Mahmassani, "Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 71, pp. 143-163, Oct. 2016, [online] Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X16301140.
2.
M. Čičić and K. H. Johansson, "Traffic regulation via individually controlled automated vehicles: A cell transmission model approach", Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), pp. 766-771, Nov. 2018.
3.
M. Čičić and K. H. Johansson, "Stop-and-go wave dissipation using accumulated controlled moving bottlenecks in multi-class CTM framework", Proc. IEEE 58th Conf. Decis. Control (CDC), pp. 3146-3151, Dec. 2019.
4.
M. Čičić and K. H. Johansson, "Energy-optimal platoon catch-up in moving bottleneck framework", Proc. 18th Eur. Control Conf. (ECC), pp. 3674-3679, Jun. 2019.
5.
M. Čičić, I. Mikolášek and K. H. Johansson, "Front tracking transition system model with controlled moving bottlenecks and probabilistic traffic breakdowns", IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 14990-14996, 2020, [online] Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896320326288.
6.
G. Piacentini, P. Goatin and A. Ferrara, "Traffic control via moving bottleneck of coordinated vehicles", IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 13-18, 2018.
7.
C. Pasquale, S. Sacone, S. Siri and A. Ferrara, "A new micro-macro METANET model for platoon control in freeway traffic networks", Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), pp. 1481-1486, Nov. 2018.
8.
G. Piacentini, P. Goatin and A. Ferrara, "Traffic control via platoons of intelligent vehicles for saving fuel consumption in freeway systems", IEEE Control Syst. Lett., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 593-598, Apr. 2021.
9.
A. Ferrara, G. P. Incremona, E. Birliba and P. Goatin, "Multi-scale model-based hierarchical control of freeway traffic via platoons of connected and automated vehicles", IEEE Open J. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 3, pp. 799-812, 2022.
10.
T. Liard, R. Stern and M. L. Delle Monache, "A PDE-ODE model for traffic control with autonomous vehicles", Netw. Heterogeneous Media, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1190-1206, 2023, [online] Available: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02492796/document.
11.
A. R. Kreidieh, C. Wu and A. M. Bayen, "Dissipating stop-and-go waves in closed and open networks via deep reinforcement learning", Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), pp. 1475-1480, Nov. 2018.
12.
E. Vinitsky, K. Parvate, A. Kreidieh, C. Wu and A. Bayen, "Lagrangian control through deep-RL: Applications to bottleneck decongestion", Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), pp. 759-765, Nov. 2018.
13.
R. E. Stern et al., "Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experiments", Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., vol. 89, pp. 205-221, Apr. 2018.
14.
M. Papageorgiou and A. Kotsialos, "Freeway ramp metering: An overview", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 271-281, Dec. 2002.
15.
A. Hegyi, B. DeSchutter and J. Hellendoorn, "Optimal coordination of variable speed limits to suppress shock waves", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 102-112, Mar. 2005.
16.
J. Reilly, S. Samaranayake, M. L. Delle Monache, W. Krichene, P. Goatin and A. M. Bayen, "Adjoint-based optimization on a network of discretized scalar conservation laws with applications to coordinated ramp metering", J. Optim. Theory Appl., vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 733-760, Nov. 2015.
17.
P. Goatin, S. Göttlich and O. Kolb, "Speed limit and ramp meter control for traffic flow networks", Eng. Optim., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1121-1144, Jul. 2016.
18.
M. L. D. Monache, B. Piccoli and F. Rossi, "Traffic regulation via controlled speed limit", SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2936-2958, Jan. 2017.
19.
R. A. Ramadan and B. Seibold, "Traffic flow control and fuel consumption reduction via moving bottlenecks" in arXiv:1702.07995, 2017.
20.
C. G. Claudel and A. M. Bayen, "Lax–Hopf based incorporation of internal boundary conditions into hamilton-jacobi equation. Part II: Computational methods", IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1158-1174, May 2010.
21.
J. P. Lebacque, J. B. Lesort and F. Giorgi, "Introducing buses into first-order macroscopic traffic flow models", Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 1644, no. 1, pp. 70-79, Jan. 1998.
22.
L. Leclercq, S. Chanut and J.-B. Lesort, "Moving bottlenecks in Lighthill-Whitham-Richards model: A unified theory", Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 1883, no. 1, pp. 3-13, Jan. 2004.
23.
C. Lattanzio, A. Maurizi and B. Piccoli, "Moving bottlenecks in car traffic flow: A PDE-ODE coupled model", SIAM J. Math. Anal., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 50-67, Jan. 2011.
24.
M. L. D. Monache and P. Goatin, "Scalar conservation laws with moving constraints arising in traffic flow modeling: An existence result", J. Differ. Equ., vol. 257, no. 11, pp. 4015-4029, Dec. 2014.
25.
M. L. Delle Monache et al., Feedback Control Algorithms for the Dissipation of Traffic Waves With Autonomous Vehicles, Cham, Switzerland:Springer, pp. 275-299, 2019.
26.
M. Cicic, X. Xiong, L. Jin and K. H. Johansson, "Coordinating vehicle platoons for highway bottleneck decongestion and throughput improvement", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 8959-8971, Jul. 2022.
27.
J. Wang, Y. Zheng, Q. Xu and K. Li, "Data-driven predictive control for connected and autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic", Proc. Amer. Control Conf. (ACC), pp. 4739-4745, 2022.
28.
C. Daini, P. Goatin, M. L. Delle Monache and A. Ferrara, "Centralized traffic control via small fleets of connected and automated vehicles", Proc. Eur. Control Conf. (ECC), pp. 371-376, Jul. 2022.
29.
P. Goatin, C. Daini, M. L. D. Monache and A. Ferrara, "Interacting moving bottlenecks in traffic flow", Netw. Heterogeneous Media, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 930-945, 2023, [online] Available: https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/nhm.2023040.
30.
M. D. Simoni and C. G. Claudel, "A fast simulation algorithm for multiple moving bottlenecks and applications in urban freight traffic management", Transp. Res. B Methodol., vol. 104, pp. 238-255, Oct. 2017, [online] Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261517300802.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.