Navigating AI Policy Landscapes: Insights into Human Rights Considerations Across IEEE Regions

This paper explores the integration of human rights considerations into AI regulatory frameworks across different IEEE regions—specifically the United States (Region 1-6), Europe (Region 8), China (part of Region 10), and Singapore (part of Region 10). While all acknowledge the transformative potential of AI and the necessity of ethical guidelines, their regulatory approaches significantly differ. Europe exhibits a rigorous framework with stringent protections for individual rights, while the U.S. promotes innovation with less restrictive regulations. China emphasizes state control and societal order in its AI strategies. In contrast, Singapore’s advisory framework encourages self-regulation and aligns closely with international norms. This comparative analysis underlines the need for ongoing global dialogue to harmonize AI regulations that safeguard human rights while promoting technological advancement, reflecting the diverse perspectives and priorities of each region.

I. Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a transformative technology that is reshaping many aspects of society, economy, and governance. By simulating human intelligence processes through computer systems and software, AI has the potential to optimize tasks ranging from the mundane to the complex, across various sectors including healthcare, finance, and education. However, as AI systems become more integrated into daily activities and critical infrastructures, they also pose new challenges and ethical considerations, particularly concerning human rights [1].