I. Introduction
Wireless communication technology has significantly enhanced the flexibility and mobility of communication devices. However, cryptographic methods implemented at the upper layers of network security reveal several limitations when ensuring secure wireless communication. In contrast, Physical Layer Authentication (PLA) has emerged as a promising technology that can provide enhanced security [1], [2]. Generally, PLA methods can be categorized into two types based on whether a key is used for authentication: key-based and key-less. One of the earliest key-less channel-based authentication schemes was proposed by Xiao et al., who established the relevant framework in their work [3]. Later, they extended this approach to time-variant wireless channels in their work [4]. This research sparked widespread interest in key-less PLA methods. Baracca et al. aimed to provide practical authentication solutions for various modern communication systems using PLA [5]. Xie et al. successfully addressed privacy issues in Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) systems using channel reciprocity-based PLA, significantly improving privacy protection [6]. However, the robustness and security of CSI difference-based PLA are severely affected by the inherent characteristics of the channel [7]. The dynamic nature of mobile communication devices, combined with fading effects within wireless channels, leads to rapid fluctuations and instability of physical layer attributes [8]. Moreover, in densely built urban environments, the rapid spatial decorrelation of wireless multipath channels can result in entirely different channel responses even with minor movements of mobile devices. These factors substantially limit the performance of existing CSI difference-based PLA schemes. Therefore, there is an urgent need to enhance the authentication performance of PLA schemes under various mobility patterns, which holds significant practical value [9].