Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Optimizing Privacy and Latency Tradeoffs in Split Federated Learning Over Wireless Networks | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Optimizing Privacy and Latency Tradeoffs in Split Federated Learning Over Wireless Networks


Abstract:

In this letter, a novel cut layer selection scheme is designed to minimize the overall latency in split federated learning (SFL) over wireless networks, while maintaining...Show More

Abstract:

In this letter, a novel cut layer selection scheme is designed to minimize the overall latency in split federated learning (SFL) over wireless networks, while maintaining an acceptable privacy level. Considering a tradeoff between overall latency and privacy level in terms of the cut layer selection, we establish a theoretical framework for managing cut layer selection in SFL to optimize the cut layer point. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of a differential privacy technique designed to enhance privacy by effectively concealing individual information. We evaluate the performance of the proposed scheme and provide insights on optimizing the overall latency of SFL while maintaining the desired privacy level through cut layer selection.
Published in: IEEE Wireless Communications Letters ( Volume: 13, Issue: 12, December 2024)
Page(s): 3439 - 3443
Date of Publication: 30 September 2024

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Split Federated Learning (SFL) is a promising technology for distributed learning that combines the strengths of federated and split learning paradigms. In SFL, clients train only a part of the full model, called the client-side model, reducing their computational load. These client-side models are then synchronized to improve convergence speed. Correspondingly, this approach has obtained significant attention, particularly in wireless networks where mobile devices (MDs) are known to have limited battery and computational resources. However, while offering notable advantages, SFL introduces additional communication overhead when communicating with servers and raises privacy concerns due to the frequent exchange of client-side model outputs and model updates, which are correlated to the raw data. Therefore, the choice of the cut layer in SFL, which divides the model into client- and server-side models, greatly affects the overall latency and privacy of SFL. Optimizing SFL management to address these challenges remains a complicated issue [1], [2].

Select All
1.
J. Lee et al., "Federated learning-empowered mobile network management for 5G and beyond networks: From access to core", IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 2176-2212, 3rd Quart. 2024.
2.
C. Thapa et al., "SplitFed: When federated learning meets split learning", Proc. Assoc. Adv. Artif. Intell. (AAAI), pp. 8485-8493, 2022.
3.
D.-J. Han et al., "Accelerating federated learning with split learning on locally generated losses", Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML-Workshop Federat. Learn. User Privacy Data Confident.), pp. 1-12, 2021.
4.
W. Wu et al., "Split learning over wireless networks: Parallel design and resource management", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1051-1066, Apr. 2023.
5.
Y. Mu and C. Shen, "Communication and storage efficient federated split learning", arXiv:2302.05599, 2023.
6.
Z. Lin et al., "Efficient parallel split learning over resource-constrained wireless edge networks", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 9224-9239, Oct. 2024.
7.
J. Guo et al., "Latency minimization for split federated learning", Proc. IEEE 98th Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC2023-Fall), pp. 1-6, 2023.
8.
G. Zhu et al., "ESFL: Efficient split federated learning over resource-constrained heterogeneous wireless devices", arXiv:2402.15903, 2024.
9.
P. Vepakomma et al., "Reducing leakage in distributed deep learning for sensitive health data", Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR-AI Soc. Good Workshop), pp. 1-6, 2019.
10.
J. Kim et al., "Multiple classification with split learning", Proc. Int. Conf. Smart Media Appl. (SMA), pp. 1-6, 2020.
11.
J. Lee et al., "Exploring the privacy-energy consumption tradeoff for split federated learning", IEEE Netw., May 2024.
12.
Z. Lin et al., "Split learning in 6G edge networks", IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 170-176, Aug. 2024.
13.
C.-Y. Hsieh et al., "C3-SL: Circular convolution-based batch-wise compression for communication-efficient split learning", Proc. IEEE 32nd Int. Workshop Mach. Learn. Signal Process. (MLSP), pp. 1-6, 2022.
14.
M. Wu et al., "Split learning with differential privacy for integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks", IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 177-184, Jun. 2024.
15.
H. Wang and J. Xie, "User preference based energy-aware mobile AR system with edge computing", Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun. (INFOCOM), pp. 1379-1388, 2020.
16.
Q. Liu et al., "An edge network orchestrator for mobile augmented reality", Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun. (INFOCOM), pp. 756-764, 2018.
17.
A. Krizhevsky and G. Hinton, "Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images", 2009.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.