I. Introduction
Advances in wearable lower-limb exoskeletons have shown great promise in augmenting the movement capability of human wearers [1], [2]. These systems have been developed for different applications, such as military [3], industry [4], and medical rehabilitation [5], [6]. Focusing on rehabilitation implementations, lower-limb exoskeletons have been designed to deliver active assistance to patients with neurological deficits for improving locomotor performance, including people with paraplegia (no motor functions), such as complete spinal cord injury (SCI) [7], [8] and individuals with reduced force-generating capacity caused by incomplete SCI, stroke, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis, etc. [9], [10], [11]. The appeal of modern wearable robotic exoskeletons in physical rehabilitation is their intelligent, active components that can be programmed toward the needs of different patient populations [5]. For example, early designs of powered exoskeletons were for patients with paraplegia, where exoskeletons were programmed to take over the entire lower-limb movement control. Typical control strategies often focused on tracking the kinematics of individual joints during walking or other locomotion tasks [12], [13]. This control technique is quite mature and has been used in the majority of commercial exoskeletons for rehabilitation. Nevertheless, for individuals who still have voluntary motor ability, joint position control is inappropriate and can potentially cause injuries to patients. Instead, compliance is essential to ensure safe human-exoskeleton interactions. Currently, there remains an open question as to how to provide the desired mechanical assistance, tailored to the individual patient, task context, and the environment, despite the emergence of many engineering efforts by the research community [2], [9], [14], [15], [16], [17].