Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Split Federated Learning-Empowered Energy-Efficient Mobile Traffic Prediction Over UAVs | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Split Federated Learning-Empowered Energy-Efficient Mobile Traffic Prediction Over UAVs


Abstract:

In this letter, to alleviate the training burden over Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for generating the mobile traffic prediction model collaboratively, we design a nove...Show More

Abstract:

In this letter, to alleviate the training burden over Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for generating the mobile traffic prediction model collaboratively, we design a novel energy-efficient mobile traffic prediction framework empowered by Split Federated Learning (SFL) for UAV networks, termed E-SFL. For this purpose, we rigorously formulated an analytical model of the overall energy consumption of UAVs, including both computing and networking energy consumption. The experimental results for two real-world mobile traffic datasets show that the proposed E-SFL surpasses previous state-of-the-art methods in terms of energy consumption with an acceptable accuracy loss.
Published in: IEEE Wireless Communications Letters ( Volume: 13, Issue: 11, November 2024)
Page(s): 3064 - 3068
Date of Publication: 07 August 2024

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Cellular-connected unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) networks are becoming integral components of sixth-generation (6G) networks, showcasing various applications (e.g., capture images and videos, and collect various types of sensing data) [1]. The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has led to AI-aided mobile traffic prediction schemes, previously explored for cost-efficient network resource management in terrestrial networks [2], [3], [4], [5], are now being adapted for UAV networks. By considering the distributed nature of mobile networks and privacy issues, one focus of recent studies is the use of Federated Learning (FL) [6] to create mobile traffic prediction models collaboratively. FL enables clients, such as multi-access edge computing (MEC) servers, to conduct local training and transmit local model parameters instead of entire datasets for server aggregation [7]. This approach helps reduce large transmission delays and processing bottlenecks associated with centralized learning (CL) servers. However, FL imposes a significant computational load on clients for local training [8]. This is particularly challenging when dealing with complex models like deep learning (DL), especially in UAV networks, where limited battery power and computational resources are major constraints.

Select All
1.
M. Wu et al., "Split learning with differential privacy for integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks", IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 177-184, Jun. 2024.
2.
A. Chouman et al., "Towards supporting intelligence in 5G/6G core networks: NWDAF implementation and initial analysis", Proc. Int. Wireless Commun. Mobile Comput. (IWCMC), pp. 324-329, 2022.
3.
D. Doyeon et al., "Joint edge server selection and dataset management for federated learning-enabled mobile traffic prediction", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 4971-4986, Feb. 2024.
4.
F. Solat et al., "A novel group management scheme of clustered federated learning for mobile traffic prediction in mobile edge computing systems", J. Commun. Netw., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 480-490, Aug. 2023.
5.
C. Zhang et al., "Dual attention-based federated learning for wireless traffic prediction", Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 1-10, 2021.
6.
A. Imteaj et al., "A survey on federated learning for resource-constrained IoT devices", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-24, Sep. 2022.
7.
B. McMahan et al., "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data", Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Stat., pp. 1273-1282, 2017.
8.
M. K. Quan et al., "HierSFL: Local differential privacy-aided split federated learning in mobile edge computing", arXiv:2401.08723, 2024.
9.
W. Wu et al., "Split learning over wireless networks: Parallel design and resource management", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1051-1066, Apr. 2023.
10.
P. Vepakomma et al., "Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient data", arXiv:1812.00564, 2018.
11.
C. Thapa et al., "SplitFed: When federated learning meets split learning", Proc. Conf. Artif. Intell. (AAAI), vol. 36, pp. 8485-8493, 2022.
12.
J. Karjee et al., "Split federated learning and reinforcement based codec switching in edge platform", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Consum. Electron. (ICCE), pp. 1-6, 2023.
13.
L. U. Khan et al., "A joint communication and learning framework for hierarchical split federated learning", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 268-282, Jan. 2024.
14.
J. Shen et al., "RingSFL: An adaptive split federated learning towards taming client heterogeneity", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 5462-5478, May 2024.
15.
J. Lee et al., "Exploring the privacy-energy consumption tradeoff for split federated learning", IEEE Netw., May 2024.
16.
C. Liu and Q. Zhu, "Joint resource allocation and learning optimization for UAV-assisted federated learning", Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 3771, Mar. 2023.
17.
A. Canziani et al., "An analysis of deep neural network models for practical applications", arXiv:1605.07678, 2016.
18.
X. Liu et al., "Energy efficient user scheduling for hybrid split and federated learning in wireless UAV networks", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), pp. 1-6, 2022.
19.
Y. Wei et al., "Minimizing age of information in UAV-assisted data collection with limited charging facilities", IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1463-1467, May 2024.
20.
Y. Liu et al., "UAV-assisted wireless backhaul networks: Connectivity analysis of uplink transmissions", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 12195-12207, Sep. 2023.
21.
D. P. Bertsekas, "Nonlinear programming", J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 48, no. 3, Dec. 1997.
22.
G. Barlacchi et al., "A multi-source dataset of urban life in the city of milan and the province of Trentino", Sci. Data, vol. 2, Oct. 2015.
23.
A. Cameron and F. A. G. Windmeijer, "R-squared measures for count data regression models with applications to health-care utilization", J. Bus. Econ. Statist., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 209-220, Feb. 1996.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.