Loading [a11y]/accessibility-menu.js
SharDAG: Scaling DAG-Based Blockchains Via Adaptive Sharding | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

SharDAG: Scaling DAG-Based Blockchains Via Adaptive Sharding


Abstract:

Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)-based blockchain (a.k.a distributed ledger) has become prevalent for supporting highly concurrent applications. Its inherent parallel data st...Show More

Abstract:

Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)-based blockchain (a.k.a distributed ledger) has become prevalent for supporting highly concurrent applications. Its inherent parallel data structure accelerates block generation significantly, shifting the bottleneck from performance to storage scalability. An intuitive solution is to apply state sharding that divides the entire ledger (i.e., transactions and states) into multiple shards. While each node only stores proportional transactions, it suffers from the challenges of storing and ensuring the processing consistency of cross-shard transactions. In this paper, we propose SharDAG, a new mechanism that leverages adaptive sharding for DAG-based blockchains to achieve high performance and strong consistency. The key idea of SharDAG is to exploit unique characteristics - silent assets - and design a lightweight processing mechanism based on avatar account caching. Furthermore, we design a Byzantine resilient cross-shard verification mechanism with a theoretically optimal number of participating nodes, which guarantees the consistency and security of avatar account aggregation. Our comprehensive evaluations on real-world workloads demonstrate that SharDAG presents up to 3.8 x throughput improvement compared to the state-of-the-art and reduces the storage overhead of cross-shard transactions.
Date of Conference: 13-16 May 2024
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 23 July 2024
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Utrecht, Netherlands
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)-based blockchain, which generates and appends blocks of transactions to the tamper-proof distributed ledger concurrently, has gained extensive interests in both industry [1]–[3] and academia [4]–[7]. Compared to traditional chain-based blockchains [8], [9], DAG-based blockchains exhibit distinctive advantages of throughput improvement owing to their inherent parallel structure. For example, Conflux [4], a prevailing DAG-based blockchain, achieves a throughput of over 3.4K transactions per second (TPS), which is several orders of magnitude higher than Bitcoin's 7 TPS [8]. We have witnessed the growing demands of developing DAG-based blockchains in supporting highly concurrent applications [10]–[12].

Select All
1.
The tangle, 2018, [online] Available: https://www.iota.org/.
2.
Byteball: A decentralized system for storage and transfer of value, 2016, [online] Available: https://byteball.org/Byteball.pdf.
3.
The swirlds hashgraph consensus algorithm: Fair fast byzantine fault tolerance, 2016, [online] Available: https://www.swirlds.com/downloads/SWIRLDS-TR-2016-01.pdf.
4.
C. Li, P. Li, D. Zhou, Z. Yang, M. Wu, G. Yang, et al., "A decentralized blockchain with high throughput and fast confirmation", Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference (ATC‘20), pp. 515-528, 2020.
5.
H. Yu, I. Nikolić, R. Hou and P. Saxena, "Ohie: Blockchain scaling made simple", Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP‘20), pp. 90-105, 2020.
6.
J. Xu, Y. Cheng, C. Wang and X. Jia, "Occam: A secure and adaptive scaling scheme for permissionless blockchain", Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS‘21), pp. 618-628, 2021.
7.
A. Spiegelman, N. Giridharan, A. Sonnino and L. Kokoris-Kogias, "Bullshark: Dag bft protocols made practical", Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS‘22), pp. 2705, 2022.
8.
S. Nakamoto, "Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system", Decentralized Business Review, 2008.
9.
G. Wood, "Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger", Ethereum Project Yellow Paper, vol. 151, pp. 1-32, 2014.
10.
W. Yang, X. Dai, J. Xiao and H. Jin, "Ldv: A lightweight dag-based blockchain for vehicular social networks", IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 5749-5759, 2020.
11.
J. Ni, J. Xiao, S. Zhang, B. Li, B. Li and H. Jin, "Fluid: Towards efficient continuous transaction processing in dag-based blockchains", IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 12679-12692, 2023.
12.
Q. Wang, J. Yu, S. Chen and Y. Xiang, "Sok: Dag-based blockchain systems", ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1-38, 2023.
13.
H. Huang, X. Peng, J. Zhan, S. Zhang, Y. Lin, Z. Zheng, et al., "Brokerchain: A cross-shard blockchain protocol for account/balance-based state sharding", Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM‘22), pp. 1968, 2022.
14.
C. Curino, E. P. C. Jones, Y. Zhang and S. R. Madden, "Schism: a workload-driven approach to database replication and partitioning", Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 48-57, 2010.
15.
R. Taft, E. Mansour, M. Serafini, J. Duggan, A. J. Elmore, A. Aboulnaga, et al., "E-store: Fine-grained elastic partitioning for distributed transaction processing systems", Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 245-256, 2014.
16.
G. Prasaad, A. Cheung and D. Suciu, "Handling highly contended oltp workloads using fast dynamic partitioning", Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD‘20), pp. 527-542, 2020.
17.
M. Abebe, H. Lazu and K. Daudjee, "Proteus: Autonomous adaptive storage for mixed workloads", Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD‘22), pp. 700-714, 2022.
18.
J. Hellings and M. Sadoghi, "Byshard: Sharding in a byzantine environment", Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB‘21), pp. 2230, 2021.
19.
L. Luu, V. Narayanan, C. Zheng, K. Baweja, S. Gilbert and P. Saxena, "A secure sharding protocol for open blockchains", Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS‘16), pp. 17-30, 2016.
20.
Z. Cai, J. Liang, W. Chen, Z. Hong, H.-N. Dai, J. Zhang, et al., "Benzene: Scaling blockchain with cooperation-based sharding", IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 639-654, 2022.
21.
P. Zheng, Q. Xu, Z. Zheng, Z. Zhou, Y. Yan and H. Zhang, "Meepo: Sharded consortium blockchain", Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE‘21), pp. 1847, 2021.
22.
M. J. Amiri, D. Agrawal and A. EI Abbadi, "Sharper: Sharding permissioned blockchains over network clusters", Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD‘21), pp. 76-88, 2021.
23.
Z. Hong, S. Guo and P. Li, "Scaling blockchain via layered sharding", IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3575-3588, 2022.
24.
J. Hellings, D. P. Hughes, J. Primero and M. Sadoghi, "Cerberus: Mini-malistic multi-shard byzantine-resilient transaction processing", Journal of Systems Research (JSys‘23), vol. 3, no. 1, 2023.
25.
Z. Hong, S. Guo, E. Zhou, J. Zhang, W. Chen, J. Liang, et al., "Prophet: Conflict-free sharding blockchain via byzantine-tolerant deterministic ordering", Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM‘23), pp. 1-10, 2023.
26.
Z. Hong, S. Guo, E. Zhou, W. Chen, H. Huang and A. Zomaya, "Gridb: Scaling blockchain database via sharding and off-chain cross-shard mechanism", Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB‘23), pp. 1685, 2023.
27.
M. Zamani, M. Movahedi and M. Raykova, "Rapidchain: Scaling blockchain via full sharding", Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS‘18), pp. 931-948, 2018.
28.
J. Wang and H. Wang, "Monoxide: Scale out blockchains with asynchronous consensus zones", Proceedings of the USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI‘19), pp. 95-112, 2019.
29.
E. Kokoris-Kogias, P. Jovanovic, L. Gasser, N. Gailly, E. Syta and B. Ford, "Omniledger: A secure scale-out decentralized ledger via sharding", Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP‘18), pp. 583-598, 2018.
30.
H. Dang, T. T. A. Dinh, D. Loghin, E.-C. Chang, Q. Lin and B. C. Ooi, "Towards scaling blockchain systems via sharding", Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD‘19), pp. 123-140, 2019.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.