Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Robust and Efficient Curvilinear Coordinate Transformation with Guaranteed Map Coverage for Motion Planning | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Robust and Efficient Curvilinear Coordinate Transformation with Guaranteed Map Coverage for Motion Planning


Abstract:

Curvilinear coordinate frames are a widespread representation for motion planners of automated vehicles. In structured environments, the required reference path is often ...Show More

Abstract:

Curvilinear coordinate frames are a widespread representation for motion planners of automated vehicles. In structured environments, the required reference path is often extracted from map data, e.g., by linearly interpolating the center points of lanes. Often, these reference paths are not directly suited for curvilinear frames, as the representation of points is not guaranteed to be unique for relevant parts of the road. Artifacts arising from faulty coordinate conversions can impede the robustness of downstream planning tasks and may result in safety-critical situations. We present an iterative procedure to adapt a reference path, ensuring a unique representation of all points within a provided subset of a map. Our numerical experiments demonstrate the efficacy of our method when combined with two motion planning tasks: Computing the reachable set of the ego vehicle and planning trajectories using a sampling-based approach.
Date of Conference: 02-05 June 2024
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 15 July 2024
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Jeju Island, Korea, Republic of
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Curvilinear coordinate frames (often referred to as Frenet frames) are commonly applied in motion planning [1], prediction [2] and control [3] for automated road vehicles. Because curvilinear coordinate systems can be aligned with the road geometry (see Fig. 1), they exhibit several desireable properties for motion planning in structured environments: We can formulate the nonlinear collision avoidance constraints from the road boundaries as linear constraints. Also, the nonlinear vehicle dynamics can be linearized around the reference path of the curvilinear frame [4].

Select All
1.
M. Werling, J. Ziegler, S. Kammel and S. Thran, "Optimal trajectory generation for dynamic street scenarios in a Frenét frame", Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 987-993, 2010.
2.
M. Liebner, M. Baumann, F. Klanner and C. Stiller, "Driver intent inference at urban intersections using the intelligent driver model", Proc. of the IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp., pp. 1162-1167, 2012.
3.
C. Samson, "Control of Chained Systems Application to Path Following and Time-Varying Point-Stabilization of Mobile Robots", IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 64-77, 1995.
4.
B. Gutjahr, L. Groll and M. Werling, "Lateral Vehicle Trajectory Optimization Using Constrained Linear Time-Varying MPC", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1586-1595, 2017.
5.
J. Pegna and F. E. Wolter, "Surface curve design by orthogonal projection of space curves onto free- form surfaces", Journal of Mech. Design Transactions of the ASME, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 45-52, 1996.
6.
H. Wang, J. Kearney and K. Atkinson, "Robust and efficient computation of the closest point on a spline curve", Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Curves and Surfaces, pp. 397-406, 2002.
7.
F. Bayer and J. Hauser, "Trajectory optimization for vehicles in a constrained environment", Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 5625-5630, 2012.
8.
B. Li, Y. Ouyang, L. Li and Y. Zhang, "Autonomous Driving on Curvy Roads Without Reliance on Frenet Frame: A Cartesian-Based Trajectory Planning Method", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., pp. 1-13, 2022.
9.
J. Ziegler, P. Bender, T. Dang and C. Stiller, "Trajectory planning for Bertha - A local continuous method", Proc. of the IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp., pp. 450-457, 2014.
10.
C. Pek and M. Althoff, "Computationally Efficient Fail-safe Trajectory Planning for Self-driving Vehicles Using Convex Optimization", Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Intell. Transp. Syst., pp. 1447-1454, 2018.
11.
S. Manzinger, C. Pek and M. Althoff, "Using reachable sets for trajectory planning of automated vehicles", IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 232-248, 2020.
12.
J. Ziegler and C. Stiller, "Spatiotemporal state lattices for fast trajectory planning in dynamic on-road driving scenarios", Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Intell. Robots and Systems, pp. 1879-1884, 2009.
13.
T. Gu, J. Snider, J. M. Dolan and J. W. Lee, "Focused trajectory planning for autonomous on-road driving", Proc. of the IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp., pp. 547-552, 2013.
14.
G. Wursching and M. Althoff, "Sampling-Based Optimal Trajectory Generation for Autonomous Vehicles Using Reachable Sets", Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Intell. Transp. Syst., pp. 828-835, 2021.
15.
K. Chu, M. Lee and M. Sunwoo, "Local path planning for off-road autonomous driving with avoidance of static obstacles", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1599-1616, 2012.
16.
Y. Sun, D. Ren, S. Lian, S. Fu, X. Teng and M. Fan, "Robust Path Planner for Autonomous Vehicles on Roads with Large Curvature", IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 2503-2510, 2022.
17.
D. Dolgov, S. Thran, M. Montemerlo and J. Diebel, "Path planning for autonomous vehicles in unknown semi-structured environments", Int. Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 485-501, 2010.
18.
X. Li, Z. Sun, D. Cao, Z. He and Q. Zhu, "Real-time trajectory planning for autonomous urban driving: Framework algorithms and verifications", IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 740-753, 2015.
19.
X. Li, Z. Sun, A. Kurt and Q. Zhu, "A sampling-based local trajectory planner for autonomous driving along a reference path", Proc. of the IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp., pp. 376-381, 2014.
20.
J. Zubaca, M. Stolz and D. Watzenig, "Smooth Reference Line Generation for a Race Track with Gates based on Defined Borders", Proc. of the IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp., pp. 604-609, 2020.
21.
A. Heilmeier, A. Wischnewski, L. Hermansdorfer, J. Betz, M. Lienkamp and B. Lohmann, "Minimum curvature trajectory planning and control for an autonomous race car", Vehicle System Dynamics, pp. 1-31, 2019.
22.
R. Reiter and M. Diehl, "Parameterization Approach of the Frenet Transformation for Model Predictive Control of Autonomous Vehicles", Proc. of the Europ. Control Conf, pp. 2414-2419, 2021.
23.
M. Althoff, M. Koschi and S. Manzinger, "CommonRoad: Composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads", Proc. of the IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp., pp. 719-726, 2017.
24.
K. Königsberger, Analysis 2, Springer-Verlag, 2013.
25.
A. K. Singh and B. S. Bhadauria, "Finite Difference Formulae for Unequal Sub-Intervals Using Lagrange’s Interpolation Formula", Int. Journal of Mathematical Analysis, vol. 3, no. 17, pp. 815-827, 2009.
26.
C. De Boor, "On calculating with B-splines", Journal of Approximation Theory, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 50-62, 1972.
27.
S. Maierhofer, Y. Ballnath and M. Althoff, "Map verification and repairing using formalized map specifications", Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Intell. Transp. Syst., pp. 1277-1284, 2023.
28.
P. Bender, J. Ziegler and C. Stiller, "Lanelets: Efficient map representation for autonomous driving", Proc. of the IEEE Intell. Veh. Symp., pp. 420-425, 2014.
29.
J. F. Thompson, "General curvilinear coordinate systems", Appl. Math. and Comp., vol. 10, pp. 1-30, 1982.
30.
A. Konyukhov and K. Schweizerhof, "On the solvability of closest point projection procedures in contact analysis: Analysis and solution strategy for surfaces of arbitrary geometry", Computer Methods in Appl. Mech. and Eng., vol. 197, no. 33-40, pp. 3045-3056, 2008.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.