Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Safety-Critical Disturbance Rejection Control of Overhead Crane Systems: Methods and Experimental Validation | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Safety-Critical Disturbance Rejection Control of Overhead Crane Systems: Methods and Experimental Validation


Abstract:

Crane systems generally operate in challenging environments (e.g., harsh weather conditions and high-altitude work), which heightens the requirements of control systems f...Show More

Abstract:

Crane systems generally operate in challenging environments (e.g., harsh weather conditions and high-altitude work), which heightens the requirements of control systems for the safety and disturbances rejection. However, underactuated nature poses difficulties in achieving the efficient positioning and swing elimination under these factors. To this end, we propose a method using a quadratic program (QP) formulation that combines an enhanced-coupling control Lyapunov function (ECCLF) with a new composite state control barrier function (CSCBF). Additionally, disturbance observers (DOBs) are employed to handle matched and unmatched disturbances effectively. The ECCLF introduces a new coupled control variable, where its tracking error ultimately exhibits an exponential convergence, elegantly overcoming the inability of full-state feedback linearization in underactuated systems. The CSCBF imposes time-varying safety constraints on the unilateral swing distance (USD), ensuring swing safety and meeting industrial payload positioning accuracy requirements. Especially, the traditional control barrier function (CBF) approach is not applicable for the proposed problem due to the infeasibility when the control coefficient of the CBF tends to zero, which is addressed by the proposed CSCBF approach. The safety of the CSCBF and the effectiveness of the controller synthesis are rigorously proven. Experimental validation demonstrates the effectiveness, safety, and disturbance rejection performance under practical working conditions.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology ( Volume: 32, Issue: 6, November 2024)
Page(s): 2253 - 2266
Date of Publication: 25 June 2024

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Underactuated overhead crane systems are essential heavy-duty material handling equipment widely used in industries, for example, construction, manufacturing, and logistics [1], [2], due to their high lifting capacity, strong adaptability, and high flexibility [3], [4]. The performance of crane systems has a direct impact on the efficiency and safety of the production process, making it a critical component in industrial operations.

Select All
1.
H. D. Tho, A. Kaneshige and K. Terashima, "Minimum-time S-curve commands for vibration-free transportation of an overhead crane with actuator limits", Control Eng. Pract., vol. 98, May 2020.
2.
J. Vaughan, D. Kim and W. Singhose, "Control of tower cranes with double-pendulum payload dynamics", IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1345-1358, Nov. 2010.
3.
N. Uchiyama, H. Ouyang and S. Sano, "Simple rotary crane dynamics modeling and open-loop control for residual load sway suppression by only horizontal boom motion", Mechatronics, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1223-1236, Dec. 2013.
4.
B. Lu, Y. Fang and N. Sun, "Adaptive output-feedback control for dual overhead crane system with enhanced anti-swing performance", IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2235-2248, Nov. 2020.
5.
L. A. Tuan, "Neural observer and adaptive fractional-order backstepping fast-terminal sliding-mode control of RTG cranes", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 434-442, Jan. 2021.
6.
T. D. Ho and K. Terashima, "Robust control designs of Payload’s skew rotation in a boom crane system", IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1608-1621, Jul. 2019.
7.
T. Yang, H. Chen, N. Sun and Y. Fang, "Adaptive neural network output feedback control of uncertain underactuated systems with actuated and unactuated state constraints", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 7027-7043, Nov. 2022.
8.
H. Chen and N. Sun, "Nonlinear control of underactuated systems subject to both actuated and unactuated state constraints with experimental verification", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 7702-7714, Sep. 2020.
9.
Z. Tian, L. Yu, H. Ouyang and G. Zhang, "Sway and disturbance rejection control for varying rope tower cranes suffering from friction and unknown payload mass", Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 3149-3165, Sep. 2021.
10.
J. Xia, H. Ouyang and S. Li, "Fixed-time observer-based back-stepping controller design for tower cranes with mismatched disturbance", Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 355-367, Jan. 2023.
11.
N. Sun and Y. Fang, "New energy analytical results for the regulation of underactuated overhead cranes: An end-effector motion-based approach", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 4723-4734, Dec. 2012.
12.
P.-Y. Shen, J. Schatz and R. J. Caverly, "Passivity-based adaptive trajectory control of an underactuated 3-DOF overhead crane", Control Eng. Pract., vol. 112, Jul. 2021.
13.
X. Wu, K. Xu and X. He, "Disturbance-observer-based nonlinear control for overhead cranes subject to uncertain disturbances", Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 139, May 2020.
14.
D. Niu et al., "An anti-sway positioning control method via load generalized position tracking with disturbance observer", Meas. Control, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2101-2110, Nov. 2020.
15.
N. Sun, Y. Fang, H. Chen, B. Lu and Y. Fu, "Slew/translation positioning and swing suppression for 4-DOF tower cranes with parametric uncertainties: Design and hardware experimentation", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 6407-6418, Oct. 2016.
16.
N. Sun and Y. Fang, "Nonlinear tracking control of underactuated cranes with load transferring and lowering: Theory and experimentation", Automatica, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2350-2357, Sep. 2014.
17.
B. Lu, Y. Fang, N. Sun and X. Wang, "Antiswing control of offshore boom cranes with ship roll disturbances", IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 740-747, Mar. 2018.
18.
J. Yang, W. X. Zheng, S. Li, B. Wu and M. Cheng, "Design of a prediction-accuracy-enhanced continuous-time MPC for disturbed systems via a disturbance observer", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 5807-5816, Sep. 2015.
19.
A. G. Wills and W. P. Heath, "Barrier function based model predictive control", Automatica, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1415-1422, Aug. 2004.
20.
H. Chen, Y. Fang and N. Sun, "A swing constraint guaranteed MPC algorithm for underactuated overhead cranes", IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 2543-2555, Oct. 2016.
21.
M. Böck and A. Kugi, "Real-time nonlinear model predictive path-following control of a laboratory tower crane", IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1461-1473, Jul. 2014.
22.
A. D. Ames, S. Coogan, M. Egerstedt, G. Notomista, K. Sreenath and P. Tabuada, "Control barrier functions: Theory and applications", Proc. IEEE 18th Eur. Control Conf. (ECC), pp. 3420-3431, Jun. 2019.
23.
W. Xiao and C. Belta, "High-order control barrier functions", IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 3655-3662, Jul. 2021.
24.
W. Xiao et al., "BarrierNet: Differentiable control barrier functions for learning of safe robot control", IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2289-2307, Jun. 2023.
25.
Q. Nguyen and K. Sreenath, "Safety-critical control for dynamical bipedal walking with precise footstep placement", IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 27, pp. 147-154, 2015.
26.
A. Singletary, S. Kolathaya and A. D. Ames, "Safety-critical kinematic control of robotic systems", IEEE Control Syst. Lett., vol. 6, pp. 139-144, 2022.
27.
W. S. Cortez, D. Oetomo, C. Manzie and P. Choong, "Control barrier functions for mechanical systems: Theory and application to robotic grasping", IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 530-545, Mar. 2019.
28.
S. Farzan, V. Azimi, A.-P. Hu and J. Rogers, "Adaptive control of wire-borne underactuated brachiating robots using control Lyapunov and barrier functions", IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2598-2614, Nov. 2022.
29.
H. Fouad and G. Beltrame, "Energy autonomy for robot systems with constrained resources", IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 3675-3693, Dec. 2022.
30.
A. D. Ames, X. Xu, J. W. Grizzle and P. Tabuada, "Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems", IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 3861-3876, Aug. 2017.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.