Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A Physical Human–Robot Interaction Framework for Trajectory Adaptation Based on Human Motion Prediction and Adaptive Impedance Control | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Physical Human–Robot Interaction Framework for Trajectory Adaptation Based on Human Motion Prediction and Adaptive Impedance Control


Abstract:

Physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) plays an important role in robotic. In order for a human operator to be able to easily adapt to interact with a robot, a minimal i...Show More

Abstract:

Physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) plays an important role in robotic. In order for a human operator to be able to easily adapt to interact with a robot, a minimal interaction force in pHRI should be achieved. In this paper, a pHRI framework is proposed to allow the robot to regulate its trajectory adaptively for minimizing the interaction force with small position-tracking errors. The trajectory of the robot is first adjusted by the interaction force which is updated by the performance evaluation index. Then, the human hand motion is predicted based on the autoregressive (AR) model to further adapt the trajectory. Thirdly, an adaptive impedance control method is developed to update the stiffness in the robot impedance controller using surface electromyography (sEMG) signals for robot compliant interaction with the environment. This method allows the human operator to interact with the robot by the interaction force, the hand motion and muscle contraction. By investigating the performance of the proposed method, the interaction force is decreased and a good position tracking accuracy is achieved. Comparative experiments demonstrate the enhanced performance of the proposed method. Note to Practitioners—This paper focuses on developing a novel method that can allow the robot to compliantly interact with the human operator while simultaneously taking into account the trajectory-tracking accuracy and the interaction force in pHRI scenarios. The proposed method has a large application potential in a variety of pHRI tasks, such as human-robot collaborative transporting, curing, assembly, cutting, and so on. In addition, the proposed method can allow the human operator to physically interact with the robot in an easier and more intuitive manner, by taking advantage of human motion prediction and adaptive impedance control. Therefore, it is also potentially utilized for rehabilitation and assistive robots, and robot learning skills from human physical demonstration.
Page(s): 5072 - 5083
Date of Publication: 24 June 2024

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Applications of robots have attracted more and more attention in recent years [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, in an increasing number of robotic applications, the physical interaction of a human with a robotic system is essential. Particularly for products that cannot be fully automated, the physical interaction between humans and robots is expected to improve the overall efficiency of various manufacturing tasks and processes. Physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) as a branch of robotics has penetrated every aspect of human society, such as in rehabilitation [7], industry [8] and agriculture [9]. It’s also a hot topic, especially when the focus is on transporting, slicing, cutting, polishing tasks and so on [10] and [11]. When a human operator guides a robot to perform a tooling task, he or she must apply a certain force to the robot to move it along the planned trajectory and achieve a satisfactory performance. Performances largely depend on the the robot’s ability of adapting their movements based on human intentions in pHRI tasks. Namely, the trajectory of the robot needs to be regulated to adapt to the human partner’s motion.

Select All
1.
F. Romero and F. J. Alonso, "A comparison among different hill-type contraction dynamics formulations for muscle force estimation", Mech. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19-29, Jan. 2016.
2.
P. Bujalski, J. Martins and L. Stirling, "A Monte Carlo analysis of muscle force estimation sensitivity to muscle-tendon properties using a hill-based muscle model", J. Biomechanics, vol. 79, pp. 67-77, Oct. 2018.
3.
C. Dai, B. Bardizbanian and E. A. Clancy, "Comparison of constant-posture force-varying EMG-force dynamic models about the elbow", IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1529-1538, Sep. 2017.
4.
G. Hajian, A. Etemad and E. Morin, "Automated channel selection in high-density sEMG for improved force estimation", Sensors, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 4858, Aug. 2020.
5.
J. Luo, Z. Lin, Y. Li and C. Yang, "A teleoperation framework for mobile robots based on shared control", IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 377-384, Apr. 2020.
6.
J. Luo, W. Liu, W. Qi, J. Hu, J. Chen and C. Yang, "A vision-based virtual fixture with robot learning for teleoperation", Robot. Auto. Syst., vol. 164, Jun. 2023.
7.
R. V. Patel, S. F. Atashzar and M. Tavakoli, "Haptic feedback and force-based teleoperation in surgical robotics", Proc. IEEE, vol. 110, no. 7, pp. 1012-1027, Jul. 2022.
8.
R. Jahanmahin, S. Masoud, J. Rickli and A. Djuric, "Human–robot interactions in manufacturing: A survey of human behavior modeling", Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 78, Dec. 2022.
9.
C. Véronneau et al., "Multifunctional remotely actuated 3-DOF supernumerary robotic arm based on magnetorheological clutches and hydrostatic transmission lines", IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2546-2553, Apr. 2020.
10.
X. Xing, K. Maqsood, D. Huang, C. Yang and Y. Li, "Iterative learning-based robotic controller with prescribed human–robot interaction force", IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3395-3408, Oct. 2022.
11.
X. Xing, E. Burdet, W. Si, C. Yang and Y. Li, "Impedance learning for human-guided robots in contact with unknown environments", IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 3705-3721, Oct. 2023.
12.
G. Peng, C. L. P. Chen and C. Yang, "Robust admittance control of optimized robot-environment interaction using reference adaptation", IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 5804-5815, Sep. 2023.
13.
G. Peng, C. Yang, Y. Li and C. L. Philip Chen, "Impedance and trajectory adaptation for contact robots using integral reinforcement learning", Proc. 37th Youth Academic Annu. Conf. Chin. Assoc. Autom. (YAC), pp. 1542-1547, Nov. 2022.
14.
C. Yang, D. Huang, W. He and L. Cheng, "Neural control of robot manipulators with trajectory tracking constraints and input saturation", IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 4231-4242, Sep. 2021.
15.
Y. Li, L. Yang, D. Huang, C. Yang and J. Xia, "A proactive controller for human-driven robots based on force/motion observer mechanisms", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 6211-6221, Oct. 2022.
16.
C. Song, J. Xia, D. Huang, L. Ma and Y. Li, "Path recognition and virtual guides design for path following based on human–robot collaboration", IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 10374-10384, Oct. 2023.
17.
Z. Lu, N. Wang, M. Li and C. Yang, "Incremental motor skill learning and generalization from human dynamic reactions based on dynamic movement primitives and fuzzy logic system", IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1506-1515, Jun. 2022.
18.
J. Li, Z. Li, X. Li, Y. Feng, Y. Hu and B. Xu, "Skill learning strategy based on dynamic motion primitives for human–robot cooperative manipulation", IEEE Trans. Cognit. Develop. Syst., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 105-117, Mar. 2021.
19.
H. Huang, C. Yang and C. L. P. Chen, "Optimal robot-environment interaction under broad fuzzy neural adaptive control", IEEE Trans. Cybern., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 3824-3835, Jul. 2021.
20.
Q. Li, W. Qi, Z. Li, H. Xia, Y. Kang and L. Cheng, "Fuzzy-based optimization and control of a soft exosuit for compliant robot-human-environment interaction", IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 241-253, Jan. 2023.
21.
C. Zeng, H. Su, Y. Li, J. Guo and C. Yang, "An approach for robotic leaning inspired by biomimetic adaptive control", IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1479-1488, Mar. 2022.
22.
L. Yang, Y. Li, D. Huang, J. Xia and X. Zhou, "Spatial iterative learning control for robotic path learning", IEEE Trans. Cybern., vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 5789-5798, Jul. 2022.
23.
Y. Li and S. S. Ge, "Force tracking control for motion synchronization in human–robot collaboration", Robotica, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1260-1281, Jun. 2016.
24.
J. Xia, Y. Li, D. Huang, J. Yang, X. Xing and L. Ma, "Spatial iterative learning control with human guidance and visual detection for path learning and tracking", IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1772-1784, Jul. 2023.
25.
Z. Li, B. Huang, A. Ajoudani, C. Yang, C.-Y. Su and A. Bicchi, "Asymmetric bimanual control of dual-arm exoskeletons for human-cooperative manipulations", IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 264-271, Feb. 2018.
26.
J. Luo, C. Yang, E. Burdet and Y. Li, "Adaptive impedance control with trajectory adaptation for minimizing interaction force", Proc. 29th IEEE Int. Conf. Robot Human Interact. Commun. (RO-MAN), pp. 1360-1365, Aug. 2020.
27.
X. Yu, S. Liu, W. He, Y. Wu, H. Zhang and Y. Wang, "A hybrid visual–haptic framework for motion synchronization in human–robot cotransporting: A human motion prediction method", IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 25-35, Dec. 2022.
28.
X. Ren, Z. Li, M. Zhou and Y. Hu, "Human intention-aware motion planning and adaptive fuzzy control for a collaborative robot with flexible joints", IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 2375-2388, Jul. 2023.
29.
M. Gao, J. Oberländer, T. Schamm and J. M. Zöllner, "Contextual task-aware shared autonomy for assistive mobile robot teleoperation", Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., pp. 3311-3318, Mar. 2014.
30.
K. Erdogan, A. Durdu and N. Yilmaz, "Intention recognition using leap motion controller and artificial neural networks", Proc. Int. Conf. Control Decis. Inf. Technol. (CoDIT), pp. 689-693, Apr. 2016.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.