Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Evaluation and Comparison of State and Disturbance Observers for a Terrestrial Hexacopter | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Evaluation and Comparison of State and Disturbance Observers for a Terrestrial Hexacopter


Abstract:

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have been used for a wide range of civil and public domain applications, as well as for missions to Mars, during the last two decades. Mul...Show More

Abstract:

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have been used for a wide range of civil and public domain applications, as well as for missions to Mars, during the last two decades. Multirotor UAV configurations, such as hexacopters, strike a balance between different design considerations, offering improved performance and reliability compared to other options. For autonomous exploration scenarios, Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) subsystems play a critical role in ensuring hexacopter stability and autonomy, especially in GPS-denied environments. However, external disturbances and system uncertainties, such as sensor noise, directly impact both navigation accuracy and control integrity. To address this, two state observers, the Unknown Input Observer (UIO) and the Extended State Observer (ESO) are presented and analyzed. Performance evaluation and comparison of both observers, UIO and ESO, is conducted with a focus on estimating the states of a terrestrial flight hexacopter in the context of an autonomous navigation mission. The underlying hexacopter mathematical model includes external disturbances and system uncertainties, such as aerodynamic drag and sensor noise. The simulations are performed in a Matlab/Simulink environment. Both observers offer robust solutions for estimating system states and compensating for disturbances, and the superiority of the UIO when dealing with random sensor bias is demonstrated.
Date of Conference: 04-07 June 2024
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 19 June 2024
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Chania - Crete, Greece
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

UAV applications span diverse domains, from remote and infrastructure inspection to search and rescue, emergency response, delivery and commercial services, surveying, mapping and weather forecasting, to name but a few applications.

Select All
1.
N. Elmeseiry, N. Alshaer and T. Ismail, "A detailed survey and future directions of unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs) with potential applications", Aerospace, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 363, 2021.
2.
V. Artale, C. Milazzo and A. Ricciardello, "Mathematical modeling of hexacopter", Applied mathematical sciences, vol. 7, no. 97, pp. 4805-4811, 2013.
3.
M. I. Ribeiro, "Kalman and extended kalman filters: Concept derivation and properties", Institute for Systems and Robotics, vol. 43, no. 46, pp. 3736-3741, 2004.
4.
M. S. Grewal, A. P. Andrews and C. G. Bartone, Kalman filtering, 2020.
5.
A. K. Singh, "Major development under gaussian filtering since unscented kalman filter", IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1308-1325, 2020.
6.
E. A. Wan and R. Van Der Merwe, "The unscented kalman filter for nonlinear estimation", Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing Communications and Control Symposium (Cat. No. 00EX373), pp. 153-158, 2000.
7.
M. K. Pitt, R. Dos Santos Silva, P. Giordani and R. Kohn, "On some properties of markov chain monte carlo simulation methods based on the particle filter", Journal of Econometrics, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 134-151, 2012.
8.
S. I. Azid, K. Kumar, M. Cirrincione and A. Fagiolini, "Robust motion control of nonlinear quadrotor model with wind disturbance observer", IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 149164-149175, 2021.
9.
S. I. Azid, K. Kumar, M. Cirrincione and A. Fagiolini, "Wind gust estimation for precise quasi-hovering control of quadrotor aircraft", Control Engineering Practice, vol. 116, pp. 104930, 2021.
10.
S. Shao, S. Xu, Y. Zhao and X. Wu, "Unknown input observer-based fixed-time trajectory tracking control for quav with actuator saturation and faults", Drones, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 344, 2023.
11.
S. Pedone and A. Fagiolini, "Racecar longitudinal control in unknown and highly-varying driving conditions", IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 12521-12535, 2020.
12.
S. Pedone, M. Trumić and A. Fagiolini, "Lateral wind estimation and backstepping compensation for safer self-driving racecars", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1-10, 2023.
13.
M. Zheng, X. Chen and M. Tomizuka, "Extended state observer with phase compensation to estimate and suppress high-frequency disturbances", 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 3521-3526, 2016.
14.
S. Martini, S. Sönmez, A. Rizzo, M. Stefanovic, M. J. Rutherford and K. P. Valavanis, "Euler-lagrange modeling and control of quadrotor uav with aerodynamic compensation", 2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 369-377, 2022.
15.
S. Martini, K. P. Valavanis, M. Stefanovic, M. J. Rutherford and A. Rizzo, "Correction to the euler lagrange multirotor model with euler angles generalized coordinates", Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 17, 2024.
16.
S. Pedone and A. Fagiolini, "Robust discrete-time lateral control of racecars by unknown input observers", IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1418-1426, 2023.
17.
S. Pedone, M. Trumić, K. Jovanović and A. Fagiolini, "Robust and decoupled position and stiffness control for electrically-driven articulated soft robots", IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 9059-9066, 2022.
18.
S. Sundaram and C. N. Hadjicostis, "Delayed observers for linear systems with unknown inputs", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 334-339, 2007.
19.
B.-Z. Guo and Z.-L. Zhao, Active disturbance rejection control for nonlinear systems: An introduction, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.