Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Modeling and Simulation of Driving Risk Pulse Field and Its Application in Car Following Model | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Modeling and Simulation of Driving Risk Pulse Field and Its Application in Car Following Model


Abstract:

For assisted driving or unmanned driving, various information acquisition and comprehensive and effective information utilization will make the driving assistance system ...Show More

Abstract:

For assisted driving or unmanned driving, various information acquisition and comprehensive and effective information utilization will make the driving assistance system and the driving measures more reliable. With the support of advanced information acquisition, information interaction and other technologies, measuring the risk threat capability of each traffic element, and using potential field theory and risk pulse theory can effectively describe the risk distribution in the road traffic environment, which is conducive to ensuring driving safety and the implementation of driving control. In this paper, we use the risk pulse energy to measure the threat ability of each traffic element, establish the corresponding driving risk pulse field based on the risk analysis of each traffic element, measure the overall risk performance and overall level of the road traffic environment from the perspectives of vector superposition and quantity superposition, and establish a unified driving risk pulse field model. The characteristics of the established driving risk pulse field model are simulated and described, including basic risk pulse energy, random risk pulse energy and relevant parameters. Taking GM model as an example, a car following model based on driving risk pulse field is established by combining driving risk pulse field with GM model. Finally, the simulation analysis of car following model considering driving risk pulse field is carried out by taking a typical car following scene as an example. The results show that the car following model considering the impact of driving risk pulse field has the following advantages: (i) It can take into consideration the impact of the front and rear vehicle motion state changes on the current vehicle driving. (ii) The headway can be adjusted according to the change of the risk pulse energy of the front and rear vehicles. (iii) It is able to select appropriate driving strategies according to the risk pulse energy level of the fro...
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems ( Volume: 25, Issue: 8, August 2024)
Page(s): 8984 - 9000
Date of Publication: 07 June 2024

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

How to avoid vehicle collision accidents and ensure driving safety is one of the most important research topics in the field of automobile safety assistance driving system and even unmanned driving system. The root cause of the collision accident is that two or more traffic elements have reached the same spatial coordinates at the same time, and the basic attributes and motion attributes of the units that collide at the same time determine the severity of the collision accident [1]. In order to avoiding collision accidents, two goals should be achieved: (i) the time of each traffic unit when it reaches the same spatial coordinates is different from each other, or (ii) each traffic unit should be in different spatial coordinates at the same time. The first goal can be achieved by traffic control, e.g., traffic rules at intersections, lane use settings [2]. For the second goal, how to control the distance among various traffic units within a reasonable range by a reasonable way becomes critical [3].

Select All
1.
J. Wang, J. Wu and Y. Li, "The driving safety field based on driver–vehicle–road interactions", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2203-2214, Aug. 2015.
2.
S. Kato, S. Nishiyama and J. Takeno, "Coordinating mobile robots by applying traffic rules", Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., vol. 3, pp. 1535-1541, Jul. 1992.
3.
R. Miller and Q. Huang, "An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning system", Proc. IEEE 55th Veh. Technol. Conf., pp. 317-321, Dec. 2002.
4.
P. Tao, S. Jin and D. Wang, "Car-following model based on artificial potential field", J. Southeast Univ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 854-858, 2011.
5.
W. Huang et al., "A new system risk definition and system risk analysis approach based on improved risk field", IEEE Trans. Rel., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1437-1452, Dec. 2020.
6.
Y. Zhang, B. Shuai, C. Fan, Y. Niu and W. Huang, "Mixed traffic flow model based on traffic risk pulse field", J. Highway Transp. Res. Develop..
7.
W. van Winsum, "The human element in car following models", Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behaviour, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 207-211, Dec. 1999.
8.
M. Nakaoka, P. Raksincharoensak and M. Nagai, "Study on forward collision warning system adapted to driver characteristics and road environment", Proc. Int. Conf. Control Autom. Syst., pp. 2890-2895, Oct. 2008.
9.
S. K. Gehrig and F. J. Stein, "Collision avoidance for vehicle-following systems", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 233-244, Jun. 2007.
10.
M. Heddebaut, J. Rioult, J. P. Ghys, C. Gransart and S. Ambellouis, "Broadband vehicle-to-vehicle communication using an extended autonomous cruise control sensor", Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1363-1373, Jun. 2005.
11.
K. C. Dey et al., "A review of communication driver characteristics and controls aspects of cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC)", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 491-509, Feb. 2016.
12.
E. Bertolazzi, F. Biral, M. Da Lio, A. Saroldi and F. Tango, "Supporting drivers in keeping safe speed and safe distance: The SASPENCE subproject within the European framework programme 6 integrating project PReVENT", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 525-538, Sep. 2010.
13.
J. Wang, L. Zhang, D. Zhang and K. Li, "An adaptive longitudinal driving assistance system based on driver characteristics", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-12, Mar. 2013.
14.
R. E. Chandler, R. Herman and E. W. Montroll, "Traffic dynamics: Studies in car following", Operations Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 165-184, Apr. 1958.
15.
G. F. Newell, "Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following", Operations Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 209-229, Apr. 1961.
16.
W. Helly, "Simulation of bottlenecks in single lane traffic flow", Proc. Symp. Theory Traffic Flow Res. Laboratories Gen. Motors, pp. 207-238, 1959.
17.
P. G. Gipps, "A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation", Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 105-111, Apr. 1981.
18.
I. Spyropoulou, "Simulation using Gipps' car-following model—An in-depth analysis", Transportmetrica, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 231-245, Jan. 2007.
19.
R. Benekohal and J. Treiterer, "CARSIM: Car-following model for simulation of traffic in normal and stop-and-go conditions", Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 1994, no. 1994, pp. 99-111, Jan. 1988.
20.
R. Wiedemann, Simulation Des Straßenverkehrsflusses, Karlsruhe, Germany:Instituts fur Verkehrswesen der Universite Karlsruhe, 1974.
21.
G. J. Andersen and C. W. Sauer, "Optical information for car following: The driving by visual angle (DVA) model", Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 878-896, Oct. 2007.
22.
K. Nagel and M. Schreckenberg, "A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic", J. de Phys. I, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 2221-2229, Dec. 1992.
23.
M. Fukui and Y. Ishibashi, "Traffic flow in 1D cellular automaton model including cars moving with high speed", J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1868-1870, Jun. 1996.
24.
R. Barlovic, L. Santen, A. Schadschneider and M. Schreckenberg, "Metastable states in cellular automata for traffic flow", Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 793-800, Oct. 1998.
25.
P. Chakroborty and S. Kikuchi, "Evaluation of the general motors based car-following models and a proposed fuzzy inference model", Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 209-235, Aug. 1999.
26.
N. Kehtarnavaz, N. Groswold, K. Miller and P. Lascoe, "A transportable neural-network approach to autonomous vehicle following", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 694-702, May 1998.
27.
D. Wei and H. Liu, "Analysis of asymmetric driving behavior using a self-learning approach", Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., vol. 47, pp. 1-14, Jan. 2013.
28.
Z. He, L. Zheng and W. Guan, "A simple nonparametric car-following model driven by field data", Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., vol. 80, pp. 185-201, Oct. 2015.
29.
O. Khatib, "Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots", Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90-98, Mar. 1986.
30.
C. W. Warren, "Multiple robot path coordination using artificial potential fields", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., pp. 500-505, Oct. 1990.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.