I. Introduction
Presently, there is a growing apprehension regarding the well-being of poultry, with a notable focus on the early detection of broiler behaviors. This has emerged as a pivotal subject in the current context. Concurrently, the maintenance of robust poultry health and high product quality is profoundly reliant upon favorable welfare conditions, a facet that inherently contributes to enhanced economic efficiency [1]. The attainment of a commendable state of welfare encompasses multiple facets: the physiological soundness of the birds, the cultivation of a positive affective state, and the facilitation of opportunities for the expression of innate behaviors [2]. However, the evaluation of welfare is a multifaceted endeavor, encompassing diverse indices such as behavioral markers, physiological stress responses, and proxies of productivity. These indices intricately intertwine, engendering challenges in their comprehensive assessment notably within the domain of commercial poultry farming. Among these evaluative metrics, behavior surfaces as the most intelligible and frequently employed yardstick for welfare assessment [3]. The vigilant monitoring of animal behaviors-such as resting patterns, feeding, drinking routines and walking-coupled with the subsequent implementation of appropriate management measures, stands poised to not only stimulate animal growth and optimize production performance, but also to safeguard animal welfare.