Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Distributed Rumor Source Detection via Boosted Federated Learning | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Distributed Rumor Source Detection via Boosted Federated Learning


Abstract:

How to localize the rumor source is an extremely important matter for all sectors of the society. Many researchers have tried to use deep-learning-based graph models to d...Show More

Abstract:

How to localize the rumor source is an extremely important matter for all sectors of the society. Many researchers have tried to use deep-learning-based graph models to detect rumor sources, but they have neglected how to train their deep-learning-based graph models in the noisy social network environment efficiently. Especially for deep learning models, the performance relies on the data scale. However, even though it is known that a substantial amount of rumor data distributed across multiple edge servers (e.g., cross-platform), due to conflicting business interests, its challenging to coordinate all parties to train a model driven by many samples while avoiding moving data. Federated learning, is an effective technique to bridge this gap. Therefore, this paper proposes a Distributed Rumor Source Detection via Boosted Federated Learning (DRSDBFL). Specifically, this paper proposes an effective rumor source detection method based on a deep-learning-based graph model with a denoising module. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to attempt the use of a denoising module to reduce the noisy effects of social networks. Then, we propose a novel boosted federated learning mechanism through boosting the high-quality edge worker to improve the training efficiency. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by extensive experiments.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering ( Volume: 36, Issue: 11, November 2024)
Page(s): 5986 - 6001
Date of Publication: 17 April 2024

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

In the past few years, with the popularity of mobile devices, the number of social media users represented by Twitter, Facebook and Weibo has surged [1]. Due to the wide coverage of users and the variety of content spread by users, this brings a huge burden to the supervision of public opinion on social networks; furthermore, it has become very difficult to locate the source of rumors. Fortunately, immediately after Wang et al. [2] proposed using a label propagation algorithm to simulate the reverse propagation process of rumors without specifying the underlying propagation model (LPSI), a large number of rumor source detection methods based on graph models have emerged [3], [4], [5]. In the face of the current complex social network environment, it is very promising to use the deep-learning-based graph model, a technology with strong generalization ability, to realize a data-driven rumor source detection method. However, there are still some problems, as follows:

Uncertainty: Previous works usually utilize epidemic models, assuming that the diffusion pattern of rumors in social networks is known. However, it is difficult to predict the diffusion mode of rumors in social networks with strong uncertainties in advance in the real world [5].

Noise: Most of the existing methods focus on how to simulate the spread of rumors in social networks, but like LPSI and GCNSI methods, they ignore the noisy nature of social networks [6]. On social platforms, as users are flooded with content on various themes, the themes of this content are most likely not related to the current rumors for which the source needs to be traced. When considering the diffusion of the current theme event, other theme events essentially act as noise [7], interfering with our line of sight. How to eliminate this noise to provide higher quality for the final service is worth studying.

Training efficiency: The social network data is huge, even for the same group of people due to the diversity of social network events or the platform [8], the scale of related event spreading data is quite large. The recently emerging federated graph learning technology only optimizes training from the perspective of node-level, which improves training efficiency but loses some edge information in the global graph [9]. How to divide graph data from other perspectives like graph-level and improve model training efficiency is a new challenge in the future.

Select All
1.
A. Louni and K. Subbalakshmi, "Who spread that rumor: Finding the source of information in large online social networks with probabilistically varying internode relationship strengths", IEEE Trans. Computat. Social Syst., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 335-343, Jun. 2018.
2.
Z. Wang, C. Wang, J. Pei and X. Ye, "Multiple source detection without knowing the underlying propagation model", Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., pp. 217-223, 2017.
3.
M. Dong, B. Zheng, N. Q. V. Hung, H. Su and G. Li, "Multiple rumor source detection with graph convolutional networks", Proc. 28th ACM Int. Conf. Inf. Knowl. Manage., pp. 569-578, 2019.
4.
J. Wang, J. Jiang and L. Zhao, "An invertible graph diffusion neural network for source localization", Proc. ACM Web Conf., pp. 1058-1069, 2022.
5.
C. Ling, J. Jiang, J. Wang and Z. Liang, "Source localization of graph diffusion via variational autoencoders for graph inverse problems", Proc. 28th ACM SIGKDD Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Mining, pp. 1010-1020, 2022.
6.
N. P. Madali, M. Alsaid and S. Hawamdeh, "The impact of social noise on social media and the original intended message: BLM as a case study", J. Inf. Sci., vol. 50, 2022.
7.
G. Chandrasekaran, T. N. Nguyen and J. Hemanth, "Multimodal sentimental analysis for social media applications: A comprehensive review", Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Data Mining Knowl. Discov., vol. 11, no. 5, 2021.
8.
R. Sinnott and Z. Wang, "Linking user accounts across social media platforms", Proc. IEEE/ACM 8th Int. Conf. Big Data Comput. Appl. Technol., pp. 18-27, 2021.
9.
Z. Wang et al., "FederatedScope-GNN: Towards a unified comprehensive and efficient package for federated graph learning", 2022.
10.
P. Ramachandran, S. Ranganath, M. Bhandaru and S. Tibrewala, "A survey of AI enabled edge computing for future networks", Proc. IEEE 4th 5G World Forum, pp. 459-463, 2021.
11.
Z. Wang, H. Xu, J. Liu, Y. Xu, H. Huang and Y. Zhao, "Accelerating federated learning with cluster construction and hierarchical aggregation", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 3805-3822, Jul. 2023.
12.
D. Shah and T. Zaman, "Detecting sources of computer viruses in networks: Theory and experiment", Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS Int. Conf. Meas. Model. Comput. Syst., pp. 203-214, 2010.
13.
D. Shah and T. Zaman, "Rumors in a network: Who's the culprit?", IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 5163-5181, Aug. 2011.
14.
Z. Zhou, H.-J. Zhang, W. Pan, B. Chen and Y. Li, "The shortest path network rumor source identification method based on sir model", Proc. Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. China, pp. 516-523, 2021.
15.
Z. Zhong-yue, Z. Hai-jun and P. Wei-Min, "Rumor source detection algorithm in social networks integrating objective weighting method", Comput. Modernization, vol. 14, no. 9, 2021.
16.
C. Zhang, Q. Guo, L. Fu, X. Gan and X. Wang, "ITE: A structural entropy based approach for source detection", Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 1-10, 2021.
17.
C. Yixin, C. Xinyue, L. Yi, W. Hanzhen, L. Yongqing and X. Yang, "Detecting rumor dissemination and sources with SIDR model", Data Anal. Knowl. Discov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 78-89, 2021.
18.
J. Choi, J. Shin and Y. Yi, "Information source localization with protector diffusion in networks", J. Commun. Netw., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 136-147, 2019.
19.
R. K. Devarapalli and A. Biswas, "Locating the rumor source in social networks using timestamps", Proc. IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Signal Process., pp. 280-284, 2021.
20.
X. Shu, B. Yu, Z. Ruan, Q. Zhang and Q. Xuan, "Information source estimation with multi-channel graph neural network" in Graph Data Mining, Berlin, Germany:Springer, pp. 1-27, 2021.
21.
B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson and B. A. y Arcas, "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data", Proc. Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Statist., pp. 1273-1282, 2017.
22.
C. Wang, Y. Yang and P. Zhou, "Towards efficient scheduling of federated mobile devices under computational and statistical heterogeneity", IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 394-410, Feb. 2021.
23.
Y. Deng et al., "AUCTION: Automated and quality-aware client selection framework for efficient federated learning", IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1996-2009, Aug. 2022.
24.
M. J. Sheller et al., "Federated learning in medicine: Facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data", Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2020.
25.
I. Dayan et al., "Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19", Nature Med., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1735-1743, 2021.
26.
Q. Wu, K. He and X. Chen, "Personalized federated learning for intelligent IoT applications: A cloud-edge based framework", IEEE Open J. Comput. Soc., vol. 1, pp. 35-44, May 2020.
27.
K. Cheng et al., "SecureBoost: A lossless federated learning framework", IEEE Intell. Syst., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 87-98, Nov./Dec. 2021.
28.
K. Tan, D. Bremner, J. Le Kernec and M. Imran, "Federated machine learning in vehicular networks: A summary of recent applications", Proc. Int. Conf. UK-China Emerg. Technol., pp. 1-4, 2020.
29.
Y. Liu, J. James, J. Kang, D. Niyato and S. Zhang, "Privacy-preserving traffic flow prediction: A federated learning approach", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 7751-7763, Aug. 2020.
30.
W. Cheng, Y. Zou, J. Xu and W. Liu, "Dynamic games for social model training service market via federated learning approach", IEEE Trans. Computat. Social Syst., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 64-75, Feb. 2022.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.