Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Equitable Transactive Market Design to Coordinate Networked Microgrids with Mixed Ownership | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Equitable Transactive Market Design to Coordinate Networked Microgrids with Mixed Ownership


Abstract:

This paper presents an inter-microgrid peer-to-peer (P2P) transactive market mechanism to support the coordination of multiple microgrids in a mixed-ownership environment...Show More

Abstract:

This paper presents an inter-microgrid peer-to-peer (P2P) transactive market mechanism to support the coordination of multiple microgrids in a mixed-ownership environment, while enabling prosumers to actively participate in the market to get their own benefits. An equitable P2P transactive energy market is designed, in which the energy burden to customers within microgrids is fairly distributed by leveraging a peer-to-peer communication network among MG owners and the distribution system operator (DSO). To reach the market settlement, a consensus-based distributed optimization algorithm is introduced to enable each MG owner and the DSO to distributedly determine the cleared price which is compensated by a household-income-based discount factor to encourage the energy-burden equity among customers in networked microgrids service territory. Numerical results on the modified 123 node test feeder including 6 microgrids are used to demonstrate the introduced equitable transactive energy market concept.
Date of Conference: 12-13 February 2024
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 22 March 2024
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: College Station, TX, USA
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Typically used to aggregate collections of DERs, microgrids (MG) are increasingly considered as a promising technology to support the integration of DERs into the distribution power networks [1]. When there are multiple microgrids and available communication/control capability, it is possible to coordinate the operations of networks of microgrids [2]. As the power systems evolve, there will be an increasing numbers of stake-holders/communities. As such, a service territory with multiple microgrids will have multiple owners including both utility and non-utility. However, in such a mixed ownership environment, it is not possible to connect all the non-utility microgrids to the utility Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) to allow for a centralized controller to collect information from and send command signal to all microgrids. Therefore, the SCADA-based centralized approach is not feasible to coordinate the operations of networked microgrids with mixed ownership, and a new approach is needed.

Select All
1.
R. Lasseter, "Microgrids", 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 305-308, 2002.
2.
Z. Li, M. Shahidehpour, F. Aminifar, A. Alabdulwahab and Y. Al- Turki, "Networked microgrids for enhancing the power system resilience", Proc. IEEE, vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 1289-1310, 2017.
3.
K. P. Schneider, J. Glass, C. Klauber, B. Ollis, M. J. Reno, M. Burck, et al., "A framework for coordinated self-assembly of networked microgrids using consensus algorithms", IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 3864-3878, 2022.
4.
T. L. Vu, L. Marinovici, K. Schneider, J. Xie, C. Klauber and A. Dubey, "Coordination of networked microgrids for supporting voltages of bulk power systems", 2023 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), pp. 1-5, 2023.
5.
A. L. Bukar, M. F. Hamza, S. Ayub, A. K. Abobaker, B. Modu, S. Mohseni, et al., "Peer-to-peer electricity trading: A systematic review on current developments and perspectives", Renewable Energy Focus, vol. 44, pp. 317-333, 2023.
6.
K. P. Schneider, S. Laval, J. Hansen, R. B. Melton, L. Ponder, L. Fox, et al., "A distributed power system control architecture for improved distribution system resiliency", IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 9957-9970, 2019.
7.
Z. Liu, L. Wang and L. Ma, "A transactive energy framework for coordinated energy management of networked microgrids with distributionally robust optimization", IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 395-404, 2020.
8.
F. Moret and P. Pinson, "Energy collectives: A community and fairness based approach to future electricity markets", IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 3994-4004, 2019.
9.
M. Mukherjee, T. Hardy, J. C. Fuller and A. Bose, "Implementing multi-settlement decentralized electricity market design for transactive communities with imperfect communication", Applied Energy, vol. 306, pp. 117979, 2022.
10.
M. Starke, B. Xiao, G. Liu, B. Ollis, P. Irminger, D. King, et al., "Architecture and implementation of microgrid controller", 2016 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), pp. 1-5, 2016.
11.
D. K. Molzahn, F. Dörfler, H. Sandberg, S. H. Low, S. Chakrabarti, R. Baldick, et al., "A survey of distributed optimization and control algorithms for electric power systems", IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2941-2962, 2017.
12.
G. Hug, S. Kar and C. Wu, "Consensus + innovations approach for distributed multiagent coordination in a microgrid", IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1893-1903, 2015.
13.
D. Wu, J. Lian, Y. Sun, T. Yang and J. Hansen, "Hierarchical control framework for integrated coordination between distributed energy resources and demand response", Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 150, pp. 45-54, 2017.

References

References is not available for this document.