Improved Target Tracking and Fusion Using Optimally Quantized Measurement Channels | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Improved Target Tracking and Fusion Using Optimally Quantized Measurement Channels


Abstract:

Nowadays, autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) technologies provide localization of AUV s, high-precision 3D measurement mapping, and underwater target tracking. Usually, ...Show More

Abstract:

Nowadays, autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) technologies provide localization of AUV s, high-precision 3D measurement mapping, and underwater target tracking. Usually, the AUV consists of various sensors to acquire the dense measurements of the underwater scene to perform target tracking and functionalities. In in-water mobility, the bandwidth is a significant bottleneck, allowing communication with other AUV s and performing centralized target tracking and fusion. Since the communication modules within the AUV are compact, low power, and have low bandwidth, the quantized measurements are transmitted to the fusion center (FC). The sensing devices provide different measurements like range, range rate, azimuth, elevation, and directional cosines corresponding to the scene. Whereas the range measurements are in meters, azimuth measurements range from 0 to 360°• Hence, using a single quantizer with a predefined step size leads to tremendous errors. This paper proposes to deploy an optimal quantizer for every measurement channel and then transmit it to the FC. To explicitly study the quantization effect, we have used linear and optimal quantization techniques which can adaptively choose the levels of the measurements. The extended Kalman filter (EKF) in combination with correlation-free covariance intersection (CI) fusion algorithm is used to attain the global track information. The performance of the proposed method is quantified using the position root mean square error (PRMSE) and compared with the no-quantization state-of-art.
Date of Conference: 18-20 December 2023
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 21 March 2024
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Ahmedabad, India
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The researchers continuously contribute to the development of more robust Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) for monitoring, detection, identification, area mapping, and tracking AUVs, fish groups, sea creatures, and species [1]. Distributing multiple AUVs and establishing communication among them to locate and track multiple underwater objects is an emerging field of research [2]. Within the water, the sonar and Lidar-based AUVs are popular and operate on acoustic and optical signals respectively [3]. Due to the low-frequency operation of acoustic waves, the UWSNs need more bandwidth to perform centralized multi-target tracking and fusion operations.

Select All
1.
S. Marini, E. Fanelli, V. Sbragaglia, E. Azzurro, J. Del, Rio Fernandez, et al., "Tracking fish abundance by underwater image recognition", Scientific reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2018.
2.
B. K. Chalise, D. M. Wong, M. G. Amin, A. F. Martone and B. H. Kirk, "Detection mode selection and parameter estimation in distributed radar networks: Algorithms and implementation challenges", IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 4-22, 2022.
3.
R. Roriz, J. Cabral and T. Gomes, "Automotive lidar technology: A survey", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021.
4.
Y. Bar-Shalom, X. R. Li and T. Kirubarajan, Estimation with applications to tracking and navigation: theory algorithms and software, John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
5.
S. Zhang, H. Chen, M. Liu and Q. Zhang, "Optimal quantization scheme for data-efficient target tracking via uwsns using quantized measurements", Sensors, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 2565, 2017.
6.
B. R. BN, S. Gunnery, P. Bethi and S. Pathipati, "Quantized directional cosine measurements based localization", 2021 10th IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), pp. 99-104, 2021.
7.
J. Luo, Y. Han and L. Fan, "Underwater acoustic target tracking: A review", Sensors, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 112, 2018.
8.
E. Felemban, F. K. Shaikh, U. M. Qureshi, A. A. Sheikh and S. B. Qaisar, "Underwater sensor network applications: A comprehensive survey", International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 896832, 2015.
9.
B. Dayananda, G. Achala, P. Srihari, M. K. Raju, G. Vandana and B. Pardhasaradhi, "A multiple llyods approach for lidar point cloud quantization and communication", 2023 IEEE International Conference on Electronics Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), pp. 1-6, 2023.
10.
B. B. Reddy, B. Pardhasaradhi, G. Srinath and P. Srihari, "Distributed fusion of optimally quantized local tracker estimates for underwater wireless sensor networks", IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 38982-38998, 2022.
11.
S. S. Blackman and R. Popoli, Design and analysis of modern tracking systems, Radar Library, 1999.
12.
Y. Bar-Shalom, P. K. Willett and X. Tian, Tracking and data fusion, CT, USA:YBS publishing Storrs, vol. 11, 2011.
13.
X. Tian, Y. Bar-Shalom and G. Chen, "A no-loss covariance intersection algorithm for track-to-track fusion" in Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets 2010, International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol. 7698, pp. 76980, 2010.
14.
S. Lloyd, "Least squares quantization in PCM", IEEE transactions on information theory, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 129-137, 1982.
15.
D. Praharshita, B. Pardhasaradhi, P. Srihari, U. S. Acharya and G. Sharma, "High-frequency and low-latency dsp architecture for information matrix fusion", 2021 IEEE International Conference on Electronics Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), pp. 01-06, 2021.
16.
B. G. Swamy, B. Pardhasaradhi, U. S. Acharya, P. Srihari, S. Reddy and R. Annavajjala, "Fpga accelerated automotive adas sensor fusion", 2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), pp. 35-40, 2023.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.