Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Occlusion-Aware Path Planning for Collision Avoidance: Leveraging Potential Field Method with Responsibility-Sensitive Safety | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Occlusion-Aware Path Planning for Collision Avoidance: Leveraging Potential Field Method with Responsibility-Sensitive Safety


Abstract:

Collision avoidance (CA) has always been the foremost task for autonomous vehicles (AVs) under safety criteria. And path planning is directly responsible for generating a...Show More

Abstract:

Collision avoidance (CA) has always been the foremost task for autonomous vehicles (AVs) under safety criteria. And path planning is directly responsible for generating a safe path to accomplish CA while satisfying other commands. Due to the real-time computation and simple structure, the potential field (PF) has emerged as one of the mainstream path-planning algorithms. However, the current PF is primarily simulated in ideal CA scenarios, assuming complete obstacle information while disregarding occlusion issues where obstacles can be partially or entirely hidden from the AV's sensors. During the occlusion period, the occluded obstacles do not possess a PF. Once the occlusion is over, these obstacles can generate an instantaneous virtual force that impacts the ego vehicle. Therefore, we propose an occlusion-aware path planning (OAPP) with the responsibility-sensitive safety (RSS)-based PF to tackle the occlusion problem for non-connected AVs. We first categorize the detected and occluded obstacles, and then we proceed to the RSS violation check. Finally, we can generate different virtual forces from the PF for occluded and non-occluded obstacles. We compare the proposed OAPP method with other PF -based path planning methods via MATLAB/Simulink. The simulation results indicate that the proposed method can eliminate instantaneous lateral oscillation or sway and produce a smoother path than conventional PF methods.
Date of Conference: 24-28 September 2023
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 13 February 2024
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Bilbao, Spain
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Annually, approximately 1.3 million individuals tragically lose their lives due to road traffic crashes, while an additional 20 to 50 million people sustain non-fatal injuries, often resulting in long-term disabilities [1]. Hence, autonomous vehicles (AVs) have been proposed to mitigate traffic injuries, leading to a safer driving environment. Collision avoidance (CA) is currently one of the most challenging tasks faced by AVs, specifically associated with the AV system's planning layer. Path planning in AVs involves the task of identifying an optimal and collision-free route that allows the vehicle to navigate through traffic while ensuring safety, comfort, and efficiency. Therefore, many excellent algorithms have been presented to complete the path-planning task [2], [3], including the rapidly-exploring random tree (RRT), A-star (A*), dynamic window approach (DWA), potential field (PF), etc.

Select All
1.
"Road traffic injuries", News Rep., Jun. 2022, [online] Available: https://www.who.int/news-roomlfact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries.
2.
B. Paden, M. Cáp, S. Z. Yong, D. Yershov and E. Frazzoli, "A survey of motion planning and control techniques for Self-Driving urban vehicles", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33-55, Mar. 2016.
3.
L. Claussmann, M. Revilloud, D. Gruyer and S. Glaser, "A review of motion planning for highway autonomous driving", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1826-1848, May 2020.
4.
O. Khatib, "Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots" in Autonomous Robot Vehicles, New York, NY:Springer New York, pp. 396-404, 1986.
5.
Y. Koren and J. Borenstein, "Potential field methods and their inherent limitations for mobile robot navigation", Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, pp. 1398-1404, Apr. 1991.
6.
N. Shibata, S. Sugiyama and T. Wada, "Collision avoidance control with steering using velocity potential field", 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings, pp. 438-443, Jun. 2014.
7.
E. Galceran, R. M. Eustice and E. Olson, "Toward integrated motion planning and control using potential fields and torque-based steering actuation for autonomous driving", 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 304-309, Jun. 2015.
8.
P. Raksincharoensak, T. Hasegawa and M. Nagai, "Motion planning and control of autonomous driving intelligence system based on risk potential optimization framework", International Journal of Automotive Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 53-60, 2016.
9.
Y. Saito and P. Raksincharoensak, "Shared control in risk predictive braking maneuver for preventing collisions with pedestrians", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 314-324, Dec. 2016.
10.
J. Ji, A. Khajepour, W. W. Melek and Y. Huang, "Path planning and tracking for vehicle collision avoidance based on model predictive control with multiconstraints", IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 952-964, Feb. 2017.
11.
Y. Rasekhipour, A. Khajepour, S.-K. Chen and B. Litkouhi, "A potential Field-Based model predictive Path-Planning controller for autonomous road vehicles", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1255-1267, May 2017.
12.
R. Rajamani, Vehicle Dynamics and Control, Springer Science & Business Media, Dec. 2011.
13.
L. Gao, D. Chu, Y. Cao, L. Lu and C. Wu, "Multi-lane convoy control for autonomous vehicles based on distributed graph and potential field", 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 2463-2469, Oct. 2019.
14.
P. Lin, W. Y. Choi and C. C. Chung, "Local path planning using artificial potential field for waypoint tracking with collision avoid-ance", 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 1-7, Sep. 2020.
15.
P. Lin, J. H. Yang, Y. S. Quan and C. C. Chung, "Potential field-based path planning for emergency collision avoidance with a clothoid curve in waypoint tracking", Asian journal of control, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1074-1087, May 2022.
16.
P. Wu, F. Gao and K. Li, "Humanlike decision and motion planning for expressway lane changing based on artificial potential field", IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 4359-4373, 2022.
17.
S. M. Thornton, F. E. Lewis, V. Zhang, M. J. Kochenderfer and J. Christian Gerdes, "Value sensitive design for autonomous vehicle motion planning", 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1157-1162, Jun. 2018.
18.
O. S. Tas and C. Stiller, "Limited visibility and uncertainty aware motion planning for automated driving", 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1171-1178, Jun. 2018.
19.
M. Naumann, H. Konigshof, M. Lauer and C. Stiller, "Safe but not overcautious motion planning under occlusions and limited sensor range", 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 140-145, Jun. 2019.
20.
M. Naumann and C. Stiller, "AIB-MDP: Continuous probabilistic motion planning for automated vehicles by leveraging action inde-pendent belief spaces", 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 6373-6380, Oct. 2022.
21.
R. Poncelet, A. Verroust-Blondet and F. Nashashibi, "Safe geometric speed planning approach for autonomous driving through occluded intersections", 2020 16th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), pp. 393-399, Dec. 2020.
22.
Y. Wang, Y. Guo and J. Wang, "A hierarchical planning framework of the intersection with blind zone and uncertainty", 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 687-692, Sep. 2021.
23.
P. Hang, C. Huang, Z. Hu and C. Lv, "Driving conflict resolution of autonomous vehicles at unsignalized intersections: A differential game approach", IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 5136-5146, Dec. 2022.
24.
D. Wang, W. Fu, J. Zhou and Q. Song, "Occlusion-Aware motion planning for autonomous driving", IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 42809-42823, 2023.
25.
S. Shalev-Shwartz, S. Shammah and A. Shashua, On a formal model of safe and scalable self-driving cars, Aug. 2017.
26.
A. Shashua, S. Shalev-Shwartz and S. Shammah, "Implementing the rss model on nhtsa pre-crash scenarios", Tech. Rep, 2018.
27.
"Saskatchewan driver's handbook", Saskatchewan Driver's Handbook, Jun. 2021, [online] Available: https://sgi.sk.ca/handbookl-/knowledge_base/drivers/emergency-driving.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.