Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic
A Lowest-Order Mixed Mortar-Element Method for 3-D Maxwell’s Eigenvalue Problems With the Absorbing Boundary Condition | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Lowest-Order Mixed Mortar-Element Method for 3-D Maxwell’s Eigenvalue Problems With the Absorbing Boundary Condition


Abstract:

Combining the traditional mymargin mortar-element mymargin method (MEM) and the tree–cotree technique, we present a mixed MEM (MMEM) based on a hybrid mesh to solve 3-D M...Show More

Abstract:

Combining the traditional mymargin mortar-element mymargin method (MEM) and the tree–cotree technique, we present a mixed MEM (MMEM) based on a hybrid mesh to solve 3-D Maxwell’s eigenvalue problems with the absorbing boundary condition (ABC). In this MMEM, to couple the different discretizations in hexahedral and tetrahedral subdomains, we design a mortar condition by which the degrees of freedom (DOFs) associated with the interface of hexahedral subdomains can be eliminated. When implementing the tree–cotree technique, the electric field and the test function are expressed by the lowest-order vector basis functions (edge elements) and the gradient of the first-order scalar nodal basis functions, which leads to a singular submatrix \bar {\bar {E}}_{\mathrm {sub}} in the mortar condition. Therefore, in this work, we introduce a method for selecting tree edges and cotree edges of hexahedral meshes to make \bar {\bar {E}}_{\mathrm {sub}} nonsingular. Numerical experiments show that the MMEM can not only remove dc spurious modes but also retain physical modes. The numerical results of the MMEM are consistent with those of the commercial software COMSOL.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques ( Volume: 72, Issue: 7, July 2024)
Page(s): 3970 - 3979
Date of Publication: 20 December 2023

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The tangential vector finite-element method (FEM) is a powerful tool for solving Maxwell’s eigenvalue problems. This method usually matches a purely hexahedral mesh or a purely tetrahedral mesh used to discretize geometric structures. For simplicity, FEM-hex and FEM-tet are introduced to denote the FEM based on the purely hexahedral mesh and the FEM based on the purely tetrahedral mesh, respectively. The advantages and disadvantages of the FEM-hex and the FEM-tet are as follows. Since complex models can be flexibly discretized by the tetrahedral mesh [1], [2], the FEM-tet is often used in the simulation software (e.g., COMSOL Multiphysics and high frequency structure simulator). However, the mass matrix in the FEM-tet is not diagonal, which is not conducive to obtaining the inverse of the mass matrix. On the other hand, although it is more difficult to mesh complex geometric structures with hexahedral elements, the mass matrix in the FEM-hex is very sparse. In particular, when the numerical quadrature points are taken as the interpolation points of the first-order Gauss–Lobatto–Legendre polynomial [3], the mass matrix in the FEM-hex based on the lowest-order basis functions (i.e., incomplete first-order basis functions [4]) can be approximated as a diagonal matrix [5]. Therefore, Maxwell’s eigenvalue problems are transformed into the standard eigenvalue problems [6], which can reduce computational costs.

Select All
1.
S. J. Wang, J. Liu and Q. H. Liu, "Mixed Nitsche’s method for Maxwell’s eigenvalue problems", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 286-298, Jan. 2022.
2.
M. Li and R. Tong, "All-hexahedral mesh generation via inside-out advancing front based on harmonic fields", Vis. Comput., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 839-847, Jun. 2012.
3.
M. Luo and Q. H. Liu, "Spectral element method for band structures of three-dimensional anisotropic photonic crystals", Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top., vol. 80, no. 5, Nov. 2009.
4.
J. Winges and T. Rylander, "Higher-order brick-tetrahedron hybrid method for Maxwell’s equations in time domain", J. Comput. Phys., vol. 321, pp. 698-707, Sep. 2016.
5.
N. Liu, G. Cai, C. Zhu, Y. Tang and Q. H. Liu, "The mixed spectral-element method for anisotropic lossy and open waveguides", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 3094-3102, Oct. 2015.
6.
Z. Jia and Y. Zhang, "A refined shift-and-invert Arnoldi algorithm for large unsymmetric generalized eigenproblems", Comput. Math. Appl., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1117-1127, Oct. 2002.
7.
M. Azaïez, F. Ben Belgacem, C. Bernardi and M. El Rhabi, "The mortar spectral element method in domains of operators—Part II: The curl operator and the vector potential problem", IMA J. Numer. Anal., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 106-120, Jan. 2008.
8.
F. Moro and L. Codecasa, "Domain decomposition with non-conforming polyhedral grids", IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 1465-1481, 2021.
9.
Z. Du et al., "Performance analysis of a coil launcher based on improved CFM and nonoverlapping mortar FEM", IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1070-1076, May 2013.
10.
C. Bernardi, Y. Maday and A. T. Patera, "A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: The mortar element method" in Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications, White Plains, NY, USA:Longman, pp. 13-51, 1994.
11.
A. Chauhan, P. Ferrouillat, B. Ramdane, Y. Maréchal and G. Meunier, "A review on methods to simulate three dimensional rotating electrical machine in magnetic vector potential formulation using edge finite element method under sliding surface principle", Int. J. Numer. Modelling Electron. Netw. Devices Fields, vol. 35, no. 1, Jan. 2022.
12.
T. Z. Boulmezaoud and M. El Rhabi, "A mortar spectral element method for 3D Maxwell’s equations", IMA J. Numer. Anal., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 577-610, Jul. 2005.
13.
A. Christophe, L. Santandrea, F. Rapetti, G. Krebs and Y. Le Bihan, "An overlapping nonmatching grid mortar element method for Maxwell’s equations", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 409-412, Feb. 2014.
14.
X. Shi, Y. Le Menach, J.-P. Ducreux and F. Piriou, "Comparison between the mortar element method and the polynomial interpolation method to model movement in the finite element method", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1314-1317, Jun. 2008.
15.
Z. Belhachmi, "Residual a posteriori error estimates for a 3D mortar finite-element method: The Stokes system", IMA J. Numer. Anal., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 521-547, Jul. 2004.
16.
C. Bernardi, N. Fiétier and R. G. Owens, "An error indicator for mortar element solutions to the Stokes problem", IMA J. Numer. Anal., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 857-886, Oct. 2001.
17.
A. Tibaldi, R. Orta, O. A. Peverini, G. Addamo, G. Virone and R. Tascone, "Skew incidence plane-wave scattering from 2-D dielectric periodic structures: Analysis by the mortar-element method", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 11-19, Jan. 2015.
18.
A. Tibaldi, R. Orta, O. A. Peverini, G. Addamo, G. Virone and R. Tascone, "A mortar-element method for the analysis of periodic structures", Proc. Int. Conf. Electromagn. Adv. Appl. (ICEAA), pp. 117-120, Sep. 2013.
19.
L. Jia, H. Li and Z. Zhang, "Numerical analysis on the mortar spectral element methods for Schrödinger eigenvalue problem with an inverse square potential", Appl. Numer. Math., vol. 158, pp. 54-84, Dec. 2020.
20.
J. Huang and J. Zou, "A mortar element method for elliptic problems with discontinuous coefficients", IMA J. Numer. Anal., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 549-576, Oct. 2002.
21.
O. J. Antunes et al., "Using hierarchic interpolation with mortar element method for electrical machines analysis", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1472-1475, May 2005.
22.
W. Jiang, J. Liu, X. Xiong and Q. H. Liu, "Finite element method for resonant cavity problem with complex geometrical structure and anisotropic fully conducting media", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 2240-2248, Jul. 2017.
23.
N. Liu, L. E. Tobón, Y. Zhao, Y. Tang and Q. H. Liu, "Mixed spectral-element method for 3-D Maxwell’s eigenvalue problem", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 317-325, Feb. 2015.
24.
N. V. Venkatarayalu and J.-F. Lee, "Removal of spurious DC modes in edge element solutions for modeling three-dimensional resonators", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 3019-3025, Jul. 2006.
25.
N. V. Venkatarayalu, "Efficient constrained finite element solution for electromagnetic eigenvalue problems with lossy anisotropic materials", Proc. Asia–Pacific Microw. Conf., pp. 1949-1952, Dec. 2011.
26.
C. L. Zekios, P. C. Allilomes and G. A. Kyriacou, "DC and imaginary spurious modes suppression for both unbounded and lossy structures", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 2082-2093, Jul. 2015.
27.
K. Chen, J. Liu, M. Zhuang, Q. Sun and Q. H. Liu, "New mixed SETD and FETD methods to overcome the low-frequency breakdown problems by tree-cotree splitting", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 3219-3228, Aug. 2020.
28.
S. J. Wang, J. Liu, M. W. Zhuang, K. Chen and Q. H. Liu, "Mixed spectral-element methods for 3-D Maxwell’s eigenvalue problems with Bloch periodic and open resonators", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1547-1558, Mar. 2021.
29.
S. J. Wang, J. Liu, K. Chen and Q. H. Liu, "A spurious-free domain decomposition method for 3-D Maxwell’s eigenvalue problems", IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 548-560, Feb. 2023.
30.
K. Roppert, S. Schoder, F. Toth and M. Kaltenbacher, "Non-conforming Nitsche interfaces for edge elements in curl-curl-type problems", IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1-7, May 2020.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.