Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathZoom.js
Personalized Federated Lithium-Ion Battery Capacity Prediction via Cluster and Fusion Modules | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Personalized Federated Lithium-Ion Battery Capacity Prediction via Cluster and Fusion Modules


Abstract:

Federated learning (FL) is a promising solution for addressing information security sharing challenges in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). It enables individual-level capa...Show More

Abstract:

Federated learning (FL) is a promising solution for addressing information security sharing challenges in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). It enables individual-level capacity prediction of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles (EVs). However, existing FL algorithms primarily focus on training a single global sharing model, neglecting the predictive capabilities of individual participants, which poses challenges for batteries with distinct capacity degradation trends. To address this limitation, we introduce battery-personalized FL (BT-PFL), a novel FL framework that provides personalized capacity prediction models based on the local data distribution of each battery. Our approach involves constructing cluster and fusion modules, creating a personalized learning space, and leveraging valuable domain knowledge. On the one hand, we proactively identify the capacity degradation distribution of different batteries, ensuring data privacy during FL within clusters. Each cluster retains domain-specific style information, enabling collaborative training and shared model parameters among participants. On the other hand, we introduce a knowledge distillation (KD) algorithm that facilitates knowledge transfer between clusters by constructing a teacher model incorporating multidomain knowledge. The experimental results on both single-domain and multidomain show that our approach not only significantly enhances individual battery prediction accuracy but also outperforms other methods across various datasets, network structures, and noise levels.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification ( Volume: 10, Issue: 3, September 2024)
Page(s): 6434 - 6448
Date of Publication: 04 December 2023

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

As the global energy crisis continues to escalate, the widespread adoption of clean energy has become an inevitable trend. Lithium-ion batteries have emerged as indispensable sources of energy in various applications, including electric vehicles (EVs), due to their long lifespan, high energy density, and environmentally friendly characteristics [1]. However, being the core energy source in EVs, lithium-ion batteries inevitably experience performance degradation during usage, and this degradation is often challenging to directly measure. While accurately predicting battery capacity poses challenges, it is of paramount importance for the reliable utilization of lithium-ion batteries. Precise capacity forecasts can accurately reflect the driving range of interest to users and enable the accurate calculation of a vehicle’s maximum energy storage capacity [2]. Furthermore, an accurate prediction of battery capacity aids in detecting battery failure conditions and proactively prevents failures through timely maintenance measures [3]. Therefore, the accurate prediction of lithium-ion battery capacity is an essential research endeavor.

Select All
1.
Y. Li, K. Li, X. Liu, Y. Wang and L. Zhang, "Lithium-ion battery capacity estimation—A pruned convolutional neural network approach assisted with transfer learning", Appl. Energy, vol. 285, Mar. 2021.
2.
J. Zhu et al., "Data-driven capacity estimation of commercial lithium-ion batteries from voltage relaxation", Nature Commun., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 2261, Apr. 2022.
3.
S. Shen, M. Sadoughi, M. Li, Z. Wang and C. Hu, "Deep convolutional neural networks with ensemble learning and transfer learning for capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries", Appl. Energy, vol. 260, Feb. 2020, [online] Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191931983X.
4.
E. Zavvos, E. H. Gerding, V. Yazdanpanah, C. Maple, S. Stein and M. C. Schraefel, "Privacy and trust in the Internet of Vehicles", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 10126-10141, Aug. 2022.
5.
P. Voigt and A. V. D. Bussche, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Cham, Switzerland:Springer, 2017.
6.
S. Li, H. He, P. Zhao and S. Cheng, "Data cleaning and restoring method for vehicle battery big data platform", Appl. Energy, vol. 320, Aug. 2022.
7.
J.-H. Ahn, O. Simeone and J. Kang, "Wireless federated distillation for distributed edge learning with heterogeneous data", Proc. IEEE 30th Annu. Int. Symp. Pers. Indoor Mobile Radio Commun. (PIMRC), pp. 1-6, Sep. 2019.
8.
A. Karim, "Development of secure Internet of Vehicle Things (IoVT) for smart transportation system", Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 102, Sep. 2022.
9.
B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson and B. A. Y. Arcas, "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data", Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Statist., vol. 54, pp. 1273-1282, 2017.
10.
Q. Yang, Y. Liu, T. Chen and Y. Tong, "Federated machine learning: Concept and applications", ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-19, Mar. 2019.
11.
P. Kairouz et al., "Advances and open problems in federated learning", Found. Trends Mach. Learn., vol. 14, pp. 210, Jun. 2021.
12.
A. Brecko, E. Kajati, J. Koziorek and I. Zolotova, "Federated learning for edge computing: A survey", Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 9124, Sep. 2022.
13.
T. White, E. Blok and V. D. Calhoun, "Data sharing and privacy issues in neuroimaging research: Opportunities obstacles challenges and monsters under the bed", Hum. Brain Mapping, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 278-291, Jan. 2022.
14.
Y. Zeng et al., "Adaptive federated learning with non-IID data", Comput. J., vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 2758-2772, Nov. 2023.
15.
Q. Li, B. He and D. Song, "Model-contrastive federated learning", Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 10708-10717, Jun. 2021.
16.
L. Gao, H. Fu, L. Li, Y. Chen, M. Xu and C.-Z. Xu, "FedDC: Federated learning with non-IID data via local drift decoupling and correction", Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), pp. 10102-10111, Jun. 2022.
17.
T. Li, A. K. Sahu, M. Zaheer, M. Sanjabi, A. Talwalkar and V. Smith, "Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks", Mach. Learn. Syst., vol. 2, pp. 429-450, 2020.
18.
S. P. Karimireddy, S. Kale, M. Mohri, S. Reddi, S. Stich and A. T. Suresh, "SCAFFOLD: Stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning", Proc. 37th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., vol. 119, pp. 5132-5143, Jul. 2020.
19.
X. Mu et al., "FedProc: Prototypical contrastive federated learning on non-IID data", Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 143, pp. 93-104, Jun. 2023.
20.
N. Shoham et al., "Overcoming forgetting in federated learning on non-IID data", Proc. NIPS Workshop, pp. 1-6, 2019.
21.
S. Kotz, N. Balakrishnan and N. L. Johnson, "Continuous multivariate distributions", Revue Économique, vol. 1, no. 454, pp. 725-760, 2001.
22.
M. Shen, X. Tang, L. Zhu, X. Du and M. Guizani, "Privacy-preserving support vector machine training over blockchain-based encrypted IoT data in smart cities", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 7702-7712, Oct. 2019.
23.
T. Li, M. Zhao and K. K. L. Wong, "Machine learning based code dissemination by selection of reliability mobile vehicles in 5G networks", Comput. Commun., vol. 152, pp. 109-118, Feb. 2020.
24.
T. S. Brisimi, R. Chen, T. Mela, A. Olshevsky, I. C. Paschalidis and W. Shi, "Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records", Int. J. Med. Informat., vol. 112, pp. 59-67, Apr. 2018.
25.
J. Qiu, L. Du, D. Zhang, S. Su and Z. Tian, "Nei-TTE: Intelligent traffic time estimation based on fine-grained time derivation of road segments for smart city", IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2659-2666, Apr. 2020.
26.
M. Liu, "Fed-BEV: A federated learning framework for modelling energy consumption of battery electric vehicles", Proc. IEEE 94th Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC-Fall), pp. 1-7, Sep. 2021.
27.
Y. M. Saputra, D. T. Hoang, D. N. Nguyen, E. Dutkiewicz, M. D. Mueck and S. Srikanteswara, "Energy demand prediction with federated learning for electric vehicle networks", Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), pp. 1-6, Dec. 2019.
28.
T. Conway, "An isolated active balancing and monitoring system for lithium ion battery stacks utilizing a single transformer per cell", IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 3727-3734, Apr. 2021.
29.
C. Boin, L. Lei and S. X. Yang, "AVDDPG—Federated reinforcement learning applied to autonomous platoon control", Intell. Robot., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 145-167, 2022.
30.
C. T. Dinh, N. Tran and J. Nguyen, "Personalized federated learning with Moreau envelopes", Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 33, pp. 21394-21405, 2020.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.